[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-451824-105":59,"doc-detail-451824-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","whats-the-goal-here-educators-perspectives-on-iowas-senate-file-496-on-school-mental-health-systems","What’s the Goal Here? Educators’ Perspectives on Iowa’s Senate File 496 on School Mental Health Systems","","Iowa’s Senate File 496 requires parent permission to formally survey students about mental health, prohibits discussion of gender identity and sexual orientation in schools before seventh grade, requires parental permission for schools to use a student nickname, and bans books depicting or describing sex acts in schools. This instrumental case study examines how educators and school board members (n = 21) perceived the law’s effects on school-based mental health systems and student well-being. Findings indicate dismantled essential screening processes, restricted identity-affirming practices, and ambiguity around emotional support, contributing to fragmented services, moral conflict, and potential long-term harm.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/whats-the-goal-here-educators-perspectives-on-iowas-senate-file-496-on-school-mental-health-systems/451824/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/whats-the-goal-here-educators-perspectives-on-iowas-senate-file-496-on-school-mental-health-systems/451824.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Sophia Brooks","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-08","2026-09-30",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What specific provisions does Iowa’s Senate File 496 impose on schools regarding student mental health and related practices?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The law requires parent permission to formally survey students about mental health, restricts discussion of gender identity and sexual orientation before seventh grade, mandates parent permission for using a nickname, and bans books depicting or describing sex acts in schools.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the study investigate educators’ perspectives on the law’s impact?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"An instrumental case study examines perceptions of the law’s influence on school-based mental health systems among educators and school board members (n = 21).",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What did participants report as the key effects of Senate File 496 on student support systems?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Educators perceived dismantled mental health screening processes, reduced identity-affirming practices, and ambiguity around emotional support, which they describe as contributing to fragmented services, moral conflict, and possible long-term harm to student well-being.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},451824,1790760193,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":26,"preview_page_count":4},962084925636,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","education policy analysis archives  \nA peer-reviewed, independent, open access, multilingual journal  \nArizona State University  \n\n| Volume 33 Number 64 | October 14, 2025 | ISSN 1068-2341 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n\nWhat’s the Goal Here? Educators’ Perspectives on Iowa’s Senate File 496 on School Mental Health Systems  \nKathryn J. Watson  \nUniversity of Iowa  \nUnited States  \nCitation: Watson, K. J. (2025). What’s the goal here? Educators’ perspectives on Iowa’s Senate File 496 on school mental health systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 33(64) .  \n[https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.33.8731](https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.33.8731)  \nAbstract: Iowa's Senate File 496 requires parent permission to formally survey students about their mental health, bans the discussion of gender identity and sexual orientation in schools before seventh grade, mandates schools obtain parental permission to use a nickname, and bans any books that depict or describe sex acts in schools. This instrumental case study examineshow educators and school board members (n = 21) perceived the law’s influence on schoolbased mental health systems and the ways they believed it shaped student mental health. Key findings reveal educators perceived Senate File 496 dismantled essential mental health screening processes, restricted identity-affirming practices, and created ambiguity around emotional support. Participants describe these shifts as contributing to fragmented support systems, moral conflict among educators, and potential long-term harm to student well-being.  \nKeywords: Senate File 496; parental rights bills; “Don’t Say Gay” laws; school-based mental health; education policy; mental health promotion in schools  \n¿Cuál es el objetivo aquí? Perspectivas de los educadores sobre el Senate File 496 de Iowa en los sistemas escolares de salud mental  \nResumen: El Senate File 496 de Iowa (Proyecto de Ley del Senado 496 de Iowa) exige el permiso delos padres para encuestar formalmente a los estudiantes sobre su salud mental, prohíbe la  \ndiscusión de la identidad de género y la orientación sexual en las escuelas antes del séptimo grado, obliga a las escuelas a obtener el permiso de los padres para usar un apodo y prohíbe cualquier libro que represente o describa actos sexuales en las escuelas. Este estudio de caso instrumental examina cómo educadores y miembros de juntas escolares (n = 21) percibieron lainfluencia de la ley en los sistemas escolares de salud mental y de qué manera creían que daba forma a la salud mental de los estudiantes. Los hallazgos clave revelan que los educadores percibieron que el Senate File 496 desmanteló procesos esenciales de evaluación de la salud mental, restringió prácticas de afirmación de la identidad y generó ambigüedad en torno al apoyoemocional. Los participantes describen estos cambios como contribuyentes a sistemas de apoyo fragmentados, conflictos morales entre los educadores y un posible daño a largo plazo albienestar estudiantil.  \nPalabras clave: Senate File 496; proyectos de ley sobre derechos parentales; leyes “Don’t Say Gay”; salud mental escolar; política educativa; promoción de la salud mental en las escuelas  \nQual é o objetivo aqui? Perspectivas de educadores sobre o Senate File 496 de Iowa nos sistemas escolares de saúde mental  \nResumo: O Senate File 496 de Iowa (Projeto de Lei do Senado 496 de Iowa) exige a permissão dos pais para pesquisar formalmente os estudantes sobre sua saúde mental, proíbe a discussão sobre identidade de gênero e orientação sexual nas escolas antes do sétimo ano, obriga as escolas a obter apermissão dos pais para usar um apelido e proíbe qualquer livro que retrate ou descreva atos sexuaisnas escolas. Este estudo de caso instrumental examina como educadores e membros de conselhosescolares (n = 21) perceberam a influência da lei nos sistemas escolares de saúde mental e de que maneiras acreditavam que ela moldava a saúde mental dos estudantes. Os principais achados revelam que os educadores p","cbCaiiNmx6NyHkJl","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiiNmx6NyHkJl","pdf",469107,24,"English","# Abstract\n## Senate File 496 policy requirements\n## Study design and participant perspectives\n## Key findings and implications","[{\"question\":\"What specific provisions does Iowa’s Senate File 496 impose on schools regarding student mental health and related practices?\",\"answer\":\"The law requires parent permission to formally survey students about mental health, restricts discussion of gender identity and sexual orientation before seventh grade, mandates parent permission for using a nickname, and bans books depicting or describing sex acts in schools.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the study investigate educators’ perspectives on the law’s impact?\",\"answer\":\"An instrumental case study examines perceptions of the law’s influence on school-based mental health systems among educators and school board members (n = 21).\"},{\"question\":\"What did participants report as the key effects of Senate File 496 on student support systems?\",\"answer\":\"Educators perceived dismantled mental health screening processes, reduced identity-affirming practices, and ambiguity around emotional support, which they describe as contributing to fragmented services, moral conflict, and possible long-term harm to student well-being.\"}]","What’s the Goal Here? Educators’ Perspectives on Iowa’s Senate File 496 on School Mental Health Systems | PDF",1790735992]