[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31281":3,"doc-seo-31281":26},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"table_of_contents":22,"faqs":23,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":24,"read_time":25},31281,13056703020460,"Valentina","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253dac470eee5d?_k=1778207105932848923",8,"Research & Report","What Urban Policies and Planning Can Learn From John Rawls","The article critically examines how John Rawls’s theory of justice has been imported into planning and the idea of the just city. It goes beyond discussing Rawls-inspired planning approaches by analyzing what role (any theory of) justice should play in urban policies. Through revisiting Rawls, it presents two objectives: evaluate prevalent applications to urban planning and offer an alternative interpretation of undervalued Rawlsian insights. It develops a “meta-theory of the just city,” outlining methodological precautions rather than proposing a full normative theory.","cbCaifqi5owh9AtS","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifqi5owh9AtS","pdf",593634,1,22,"English","# Introduction\n## Rawls and the influence on planning\n# Rawlsian approaches in planning: the prevalent view\n## Core principles and common applications","[{\"question\":\"What is the main critical focus of the article on Rawls and planning?\",\"answer\":\"It scrutinizes how Rawlsian justice has been adopted in planning and the just city, arguing that the import is often debatable. It aims to clarify what meaning and role justice should have in urban policies.\"},{\"question\":\"What two points does the article use to structure its revisiting of Rawls’s view?\",\"answer\":\"First, it critically discusses how Rawls’s theory of justice is generally applied to urban policies and planning. Second, it explores an alternative way to interpret and apply certain (often undervalued) Rawlsian insights in this field.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the article mean by a “meta-theory of the just city”?\",\"answer\":\"Instead of defending a complete normative theory or proposing a specific substantive just city idea, it highlights fundamental methodological and analytical caveats. The approach specifies precautions and conditions for any coherent and convincing just city theory.\"}]",1779224645,55,{"code":4,"msg":27,"data":28},"ok",{"site_id":29,"language":30,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":24},105,"en","what-urban-policies-and-planning-can-learn-from-john-rawls","",{"@graph":34,"@context":84},[35,52,67],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/what-urban-policies-and-planning-can-learn-from-john-rawls/31281/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-21","2026-05-19",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"What is the main critical focus of the article on Rawls and planning?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"It scrutinizes how Rawlsian justice has been adopted in planning and the just city, arguing that the import is often debatable. It aims to clarify what meaning and role justice should have in urban policies.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"What two points does the article use to structure its revisiting of Rawls’s view?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"First, it critically discusses how Rawls’s theory of justice is generally applied to urban policies and planning. Second, it explores an alternative way to interpret and apply certain (often undervalued) Rawlsian insights in this field.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"What does the article mean by a “meta-theory of the just city”?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"Instead of defending a complete normative theory or proposing a specific substantive just city idea, it highlights fundamental methodological and analytical caveats. The approach specifies precautions and conditions for any coherent and convincing just city theory.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":86,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":29}]