[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-639232-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":79,"doc-detail-639232-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":72,"head_meta":74,"extra_data":76,"updated_unix":78},105,"en","warmth-and-competence-as-universal-dimensions-of-social-perception-the-stereotype-content-model-and-the-bias-map-chapter-2","Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception - The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map - Chapter 2","","The stereotype content model (SCM) proposes warmth and competence as two core dimensions of social perception, each predicted by perceived status and competition. Different warmth-by-competence combinations yield intergroup emotions such as admiration, envy, pity, and disgust. These affective and stereotypic processes are linked through the BIAS map to distinct behavior patterns, including active versus passive actions and facilitation versus harm. The chapter reviews how warmth/communion and competence/agency structure interpersonal and intergroup judgment.",{"@graph":14,"@context":71},[15,34,54],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/warmth-and-competence-as-universal-dimensions-of-social-perception-the-stereotype-content-model-and-the-bias-map-chapter-2/639232/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":48,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":49,"interactionStatistic":50},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/warmth-and-competence-as-universal-dimensions-of-social-perception-the-stereotype-content-model-and-the-bias-map-chapter-2/639232.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Liam","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22",true,{"@type":51,"interactionType":52,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":53},"ViewAction",{"@type":55,"mainEntity":56},"FAQPage",[57,63,67],{"name":58,"@type":59,"acceptedAnswer":60},"What two dimensions does the stereotype content model use to explain social perception?","Question",{"text":61,"@type":62},"The model defines warmth and competence as two fundamental dimensions of social perception, predicted by perceived competition and status respectively.","Answer",{"name":64,"@type":59,"acceptedAnswer":65},"How does warmth and competence combine to produce different emotional reactions?",{"text":66,"@type":62},"Distinct warmth-by-competence combinations generate different intergroup emotions, including admiration, envy, pity, and disgust.",{"name":68,"@type":59,"acceptedAnswer":69},"What is the role of the BIAS map in linking stereotypes and behavior?",{"text":70,"@type":62},"The BIAS map connects intergroup affect and stereotypes to behavioral outcomes, predicting patterns such as active versus passive actions and facilitation versus harm.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":73,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":75,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":77,"site_id":7},639232,1792702550,{"code":4,"msg":80,"data":81},"success",[82,86,90,94,99,104,109,113,118,121,125],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":83,"show_sort_weight":84,"slug":85},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":87,"show_sort_weight":88,"slug":89},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":95,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":100,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":111,"slug":112},8,30,"research-report",{"id":114,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":115,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":119,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":120},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":122,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":123,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":124},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":126,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":127,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":128},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":80,"data":130},{"doc_id":77,"user_id":131,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":110,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":84,"language":138,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":139,"faqs":140,"seo_title":141,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":78,"read_time":142},8796095461564,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","C H A P T E R T W O  \nWarmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map  \nAmy J. C. Cuddy,* Susan T. Fiske,† and Peter Glick‡  \nContents  \n1. Introduction 62  \n1.1. Defining warmth and competence 65  \n1.2. The stereotype content model and the BIAS map 66  \n2. Warmth and Competence as Fundamental Dimensions  \nof Social Perception 71  \n2.1. Interpersonal perception 71  \n2.2. Intergroup perception 74  \n2.3. Primacy of warmth 89  \n3. Social Structural Roots of Warmth and Competence Judgments 93  \n3.1. Why social status should predict competence judgments 94  \n3.2. Why competition should predict warmth judgments 95  \n3.3. US tests of SCM structural hypotheses 96  \n3.4. Cross-cultural tests of SCM structural hypotheses 99  \n3.5. Converging theory and evidence 101  \n4. Emotional, Behavioral, and Attributional Consequences 102  \n4.1. Prejudiced emotions: Admiration, contempt, envy, and pity 102  \n4.2. Behaviors: Active and passive, facilitation and harm 108  \n5. Spotlight on Ambivalent Combinations: Warm–Incompetent and Competent–Cold 119  \n5.1. Pitying prejudice: Warm but incompetent 120  \n5.2. Envious prejudice: Competent but cold 125  \n6. Current and Future Directions and Summary 130  \n6.1. Current and future directions 130  \n6.2. Summary 137  \n* Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 { Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540 { Department of Psychology, Lawrence University, Appleton, WI 54912  \nAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 40 \\# 2008 Elsevier Inc. ISSN 0065-2601, DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0 All rights reserved.  \n61  \n62 Amy J. C. Cuddy et al.  \nAcknowledgments 137  \nReferences 138  \nAbstract  \nThe stereotype content model (SCM) defines two fundamental dimensions of social perception, warmth and competence, predicted respectively by perceived competition and status. Combinations of warmth and competence generate distinct emotions of admiration, envy, pity, and disgust. From these intergroup emotions and stereotypes, the behavior from intergroup affect and stereotypes (BIAS) map predicts distinct behaviors: active and passive, facilitative and harmful. After defining warmth/communion and competence/agency, the chapter integrates converging work documenting the centrality of these dimensions in interpersonal as well as intergroup perception. Structural origins of warmth and competence perceptions result from competitors judged as not warm, and allies judged as warm; high status confers competence and low status incompetence. Warmth and competence judgments support systematic patterns of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions, including ambivalent prejudices. Past views of prejudice as a univalent antipathy have obscured the unique responses toward groups stereotyped as competent but not warm or warm but not competent. Finally, the chapter addresses unresolved issues and future research directions.  \n1. Introduction  \nSit in any airport, train station, or bus depot, then watch and listen. The sheer ethnic variety reflected in the visual and aural parade staggers the mind. This variety requires adjustments on all sides, as the world’s peoples encounter each other. The circumstances of migration generate particular images of distinct groups, which in turn create distinct feelings and impulses. Mapping this new geography of intergroup and interpersonal contact is the business of this chapter. Migration and ethnic stereotypes are not new, of course,but the circumstances of ethnic groups shift with history, and with these structural changes come changes in patterns of stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination. For example, ethnic Chinese who migrated to the United States in the mid-19th century to help build railroads were seen as animal laborers, neither especially competent nor especially trustworthy. After they were expelled and new Chinese migrants appeared in the 20th cen","cbCaiqQMrSpreNQP","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqQMrSpreNQP","pdf",505293,"English","# Introduction\n## Defining warmth and competence\n## The stereotype content model and the BIAS map\n# Warmth and Competence as Fundamental Dimensions of Social Perception\n## Interpersonal perception\n## Intergroup perception\n## Primacy of warmth\n# Social Structural Roots of Warmth and Competence Judgments\n## Why social status should predict competence judgments\n## Why competition should predict warmth judgments\n## US tests of SCM structural hypotheses\n## Cross-cultural tests of SCM structural hypotheses\n## Converging theory and evidence\n# Emotional, Behavioral, and Attributional Consequences\n## Prejudiced emotions: Admiration, contempt, envy, and pity\n## Behaviors: Active and passive, facilitation and harm\n# Spotlight on Ambivalent Combinations: Warm–Incompetent and Competent–Cold\n## Pitying prejudice: Warm but incompetent\n## Envious prejudice: Competent but cold\n# Current and Future Directions and Summary\n## Current and future directions\n## Summary","[{\"question\":\"What two dimensions does the stereotype content model use to explain social perception?\",\"answer\":\"The model defines warmth and competence as two fundamental dimensions of social perception, predicted by perceived competition and status respectively.\"},{\"question\":\"How does warmth and competence combine to produce different emotional reactions?\",\"answer\":\"Distinct warmth-by-competence combinations generate different intergroup emotions, including admiration, envy, pity, and disgust.\"},{\"question\":\"What is the role of the BIAS map in linking stereotypes and behavior?\",\"answer\":\"The BIAS map connects intergroup affect and stereotypes to behavioral outcomes, predicting patterns such as active versus passive actions and facilitation versus harm.\"}]","Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception - The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map - Chapter 2 | PDF",227]