[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-568634-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-568634-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","volume6a-issue-9-a-bi-weekly-report-on-significant-developments-for-leaders-in-criminal-justice-administration","VOLUME6A - Issue 9 - A Bi-Weekly Report on Significant Developments for Leaders in Criminal Justice Administration","","Bi-weekly leadership briefing on major developments in U.S. criminal justice administration, issued for the National Council on Crime and Delinquency (April 28, 1975). Coverage highlights pressures on police productivity and summarizes updates across planning, probation and parole, judicial process, corrections, productivity-focused special reporting, and Washington-related education and youth programs. A featured article describes California Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr.’s criticism of LEAA-funded programs, including proposed grant reductions, review options, legislative responses, and local impacts on morale and planning.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/volume6a-issue-9-a-bi-weekly-report-on-significant-developments-for-leaders-in-criminal-justice-administration/568634/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/volume6a-issue-9-a-bi-weekly-report-on-significant-developments-for-leaders-in-criminal-justice-administration/568634.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"acoobca","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-10-13",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":30},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What issue and publication details are shown for this report?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The document is labeled VOLUME 6A and NUMBER 9, dated April 28, 1975. It is presented as a bi-weekly report for leaders in criminal justice administration.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What main factor is cited as pressuring police productivity?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"The report links rising costs and shrinking revenues, the squeeze on taxpayers, and continued increases in reported crime rates to the need to address police productivity.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How does Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. challenge LEAA-funded programs in California?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"He vows to put LEAA-funded programs “on trial” and to propose returning money if the verdict is negative. The report describes his review of California’s Office of Criminal Justice Planning, legislative moves affecting matching funds, and release of funds alongside ongoing reviews.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},568634,1792014360,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":30,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":115,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},3985747870733,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","VOLUME6A PUBLICATION OFNUMBER 9THE NATIONALCOUNCILAPRIL28,1975ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY  \n# A Bi-Weekly Report on Significant DevelopmentsFor Leaders in Criminal Justice Administration\n\n\"Rising costs,shrinking revenues,the squeeze on thetaxpayer,and the continued increase in reported crimerates are among thefactors that now force us to considerseriously the issue of police productivity.\"Patrick V.Murphy,president of the Police Foundation(p.4)  \nCriminal Justice Planning(1).●New Californiagovernor scores LEAA-funded projects in his state,threatens to return federal grants.  \nProbation,Parole(2).·Georgia Commissionerproposes end to parole as two state corrections agenciesstruggle for power.  \nJudicial Process(3).●US.Supreme Court hearsdeath penalty case-three issues emerge.  \nCorrections(3).●Changes in federal correctionsaffect parole due process,inmate rehabilitation,andpre-trial diversion·Closed-circuit television of limiteduse in prison security,study says.  \nSpecial Report(4).●Excerpts from proceedingsat the recent National Conference on Productivity inPolicing.  \nWashington Report(6).●Educators clash athearing on school violence·HEW sets $5 million forrunaway youth programs.  \nListings,Announcements(7).·U.S.Conference  \nof Mayors initiates gun control clearinghouse.  \nCopyright 1975 National Council on Crime and Delinquency,411 Hackensack Ave.,Hackensack,NJ07601  \n# Brown Assails LEAA Programs in California,Threatens To Drop All’75-'76 Grants\n\nGovernor Edmund G.Brown Jr.has traumatizedCalifornia's criminal justice community this month withhis vow to put LEAA-funded programs in the state “ontrial,\"and,if the verdict is negative,\"to very seriouslypropose returning the money\"to the federal treasury.  \nBrown's barbed remarks at an April 2 press con-ference,along with subsequent developments,havestamped a big question mark over LEAA-aided programsscheduled to start or resume in the 1975-76 fiscal yearnow only a little over two months away.  \nLabeling the LEAA-funded efforts “leaf-rakingprojects for white collar workers,”Brown scored theprograms as “another example of misguided efforts atthe federal level aimed at making the states do what theydon't want to do.”The governor accused criminal jus-tice professionals of obtaining federal funds for projectswhich previously have been rejected by state and localofficials.  \nReview Team.Following his press conference,Brown dispatched a team of his aides under his executiveassistant,Gray Davis,to dissect the operations of Cali-fornia's state planning agency,the Office of CriminalJustice Planning.The interim OCJP director named atthat time was Department of Finance program budgetmanager Dr.AlM.Loeb.  \nIn a phone interview with CJN on April 18,Loebstated that“what is going to happen next is still verymuch open.\"He predicted that Brown will submit tothe legislature by early May new OCJP recommendations  \nfor the 1975-76 budget year.  \nLoeb related that Brown has ordered him to assessthe value of OCJP efforts at reducing crime,system im-provement,integrated planning,and efficiency.\"It'sreally a pretty broad,sweeping thing,\"Loeb commented.  \nSome of the options being considered by Loebinclude:1)to jettison the program entirely and returngrant funds to Washington;2)to streamline the presentsystem by funneling state grants directly to local govern-ment,thus eliminating regional councils;and 3)to setstrong annual priorities at the state level for local agenciesto follow.This list is not exhaustive,Loeb indicated.  \nLegislative Response.A state Senate subcommitteeon April 10echoed the governor's dissatisfaction.Sub-committee number four of the Senate Finance Committeevoted 2-1 to eliminate OCJP matching funds from the1975-76 budget-in effect,expunging the LEAA programs.In contrast,at about the same time an Assembly Ways andMeans Committee subcommittee endorsed the governor'searlier request for a “stand-still”OCJP budget next year.  \nActually,Brown's review of the OCJP began whenhis administration t","cbCaiqxDlQzJb65Y","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqxDlQzJb65Y","pdf",3615606,"English","# A Bi-Weekly Report on Significant Developments for Leaders in Criminal Justice Administration\n## Crime and Delinquency Highlights by Topic\n## Brown Assails LEAA Programs in California, Threatens To Drop All ’75–’76 Grants","[{\"question\":\"What issue and publication details are shown for this report?\",\"answer\":\"The document is labeled VOLUME 6A and NUMBER 9, dated April 28, 1975. It is presented as a bi-weekly report for leaders in criminal justice administration.\"},{\"question\":\"What main factor is cited as pressuring police productivity?\",\"answer\":\"The report links rising costs and shrinking revenues, the squeeze on taxpayers, and continued increases in reported crime rates to the need to address police productivity.\"},{\"question\":\"How does Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. challenge LEAA-funded programs in California?\",\"answer\":\"He vows to put LEAA-funded programs “on trial” and to propose returning money if the verdict is negative. The report describes his review of California’s Office of Criminal Justice Planning, legislative moves affecting matching funds, and release of funds alongside ongoing reviews.\"}]","VOLUME6A - Issue 9 - A Bi-Weekly Report on Significant Developments for Leaders in Criminal Justice Administration | PDF",1791871716,23]