[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-321450-105":59,"doc-detail-321450-en":124},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":117,"head_meta":119,"extra_data":121,"updated_unix":123},105,"en","vollxi-no24-december-24-1964-journal-of-philosophy-issue-articles","VOL.LXI, No.24 - December 24, 1964 - Journal of Philosophy issue articles","","A philosophical journal issue presents a focus on indirect discourse through an inscriptional approach, centering on Marilyn P. Frye’s article “Inscriptions and Indirect Discourse.” The text advances a detailed analysis of how indirect quotation and that-clauses can be treated via concrete inscription replication, first recounting Israel Scheffler’s nominalistic framework and then evaluating its correctness against objections previously attributed to Church. The issue also lists related contributions and a volume index.",{"@graph":69,"@context":116},[70,84,99],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/vollxi-no24-december-24-1964-journal-of-philosophy-issue-articles/321450/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"author":86,"headline":65,"publisher":89,"fileFormat":92,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":93,"datePublished":93,"encodingFormat":92,"isAccessibleForFree":94,"interactionStatistic":95},"DigitalDocument",{"name":87,"@type":88},"Ava Thompson","Person",{"url":74,"name":90,"@type":91},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":96,"interactionType":97,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":98},"ViewAction",{"@type":100,"mainEntity":101},"FAQPage",[102,108,112],{"name":103,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":105},"What is the main topic of the provided article section?","Question",{"text":106,"@type":107},"The section focuses on an inscriptional approach to indirect quotation and indirect discourse, examining how sentences of the form “writes that …” should be analyzed.","Answer",{"name":109,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":110},"How does the section describe Scheffler’s approach to indirect quotation?",{"text":111,"@type":107},"It explains that Scheffler treats that-clauses as single predicates of concrete inscriptions, where each inscription denoted by a that-clause is a replica of the others, and the that-content is identified as the clause’s content excluding “that”.",{"name":113,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":114},"What argument does the author make about Scheffler’s analysis?",{"text":115,"@type":107},"The author argues that the analysis is not correct, shifting attention from whether it avoids Church’s objections to whether it truly matches the phenomena it aims to explain.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":118,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":90,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":120,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":122,"site_id":62},321450,1789959344,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":125},{"doc_id":122,"user_id":126,"nickname":87,"user_avatar":127,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":128,"file_id":129,"file_url":130,"file_type":131,"file_size":132,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":133,"language":134,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":135,"faqs":136,"seo_title":137,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":123,"read_time":138},1649267921044,"https://us-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1800007509477c92dfb?_k=1786009248482753345","VOL.LXI,No.24:DECEMBER 24,1964  \nInscriptions and Indirect Discourse:MARILYN P.FRYE ....767  \nConments and Criticism  \nSo,Hume Did Read Berkeley:RICHARD H.PoPKIN ……  …773  \nCriterion of Personal Identity:NEwroN GARVER ……………779  \nBook Review  \nALAN DoNAGAN:The Later Philosophy of R.G.Collingwood:JUDITH JARVIS THOMSON ..…....  …          ..784  \nIndex to Volume LXI .................................787  \nPUBLISHED FORTNIGHTLY  \nBY THE  \nJOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY,INC.  \nTHE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY  \nFoUNDEHD BY FREDERICK J.E.WoODBRIDGE AND WENDELLT.BuSH  \nEDITORS:John H.Randall,Jr.,Sidney Morgenbesser,Arthur Danto,andJames J.Walsh.  \nCoNSULTING EDITORS:Herbert W.Sehneider,José Ferrater Mora,andGeorge L.Kline.  \nMANAGING EDITOR:Leigh S.Cauman.  \nCommunieations to the editors should be addressed to the Managing Edi-tor,720 Philosophy Hall,Columbia University,New York,N.Y.,10027.Subseriptions and advertisements should be sent to THE JOURNALOF PHILOSOPHY,720 Philosophy Hall,Columbia University,NewYork,N.Y,10027.The annual subseription price(24 numbers)is  \n$7.50;to students,$6.00.The price of single numbers is $0.50;double numbers,$1.00;complete volumes(from 1960 on),$12.00.  \nTHE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY is owned by the Journal ofPhilosophy,Ine.,and published bi-weekly(every four weeks in Julyand August)by Laneaster Press,Inc.,Prince and Lemon Sts.,Lan-caster,Pa.,17604.Editorial Office:720 Philosophy Hall,ColumbiaUniversity,New_York,N.Y.,10027.President,Albert G.Redpath;Vice President,John H.Randall,Jr.;Treasurer,Frederick A.Dewey;Secretary,Corliss Lamont.  \nSecond-class postage paid at Lancaster,Pa.  \n\n| The Monist  \u003Cbr>An International Quarterly Journal  \u003Cbr>of General Philosophical Inquiry  \u003Cbr>Editor,EUGENE FREEMAN  \u003Cbr>Founded 1888 by EDWARD C.HECELER  \u003Cbr>Editorial_Board:Monroe C.Beardsley,Lewis White Beck,William Frankena,Richard  \u003Cbr>Martin,Fr.Joseph Owens,Wilfrid Sellars,John E.Smith,Gregory Vlastos  \u003Cbr>EACH ISSUE is limited to articles on a single general topic.  \u003Cbr>GENERAL TOPICS for recent and forthcoming issues:   |\n| --- |\n| Vol.47,No.1  \u003Cbr>Philosophy of the New Cosmology  \u003Cbr>Fall,1962  \u003Cbr>Metaphysics Today  \u003Cbr>Vol.47,No.2  \u003Cbr>Winter,1963  \u003Cbr>Spring,1963  \u003Cbr>Vol.47,No.3  \u003Cbr>Religious Language and Philosophy  \u003Cbr>Vol.47,No.4  \u003Cbr>Ethics and Anthropology  \u003Cbr>Summer,1963  \u003Cbr>Jan.,1964  \u003Cbr>Vol.48,No.1  \u003Cbr>Hegel Today  \u003Cbr>Apr.,1964  \u003Cbr>Vol.48,No.2  \u003Cbr>Philosophy of Recent Science  \u003Cbr>July,1964  \u003Cbr>Vol.48,No.3  \u003Cbr>American Philosophy  \u003Cbr>Oct.,1964  \u003Cbr>Vol.48,No.4  \u003Cbr>Philosophical Argument  \u003Cbr>Jan.,1965  \u003Cbr>Vol.49,No.1  \u003Cbr>Linguistic Analysis and Phenomenology  \u003Cbr>Vol.49,No.2  \u003Cbr>Apr,1965  \u003Cbr>Agent and Spectator  \u003Cbr>Vol.49,No.3  \u003Cbr>Philosophy of Law  \u003Cbr>July,1965  \u003Cbr>Oct.,1965  \u003Cbr>Vol.49,No.4  \u003Cbr>Philosophy of John Duns Scotus  \u003Cbr>Concept of Existence  \u003Cbr>Jan.,1966  \u003Cbr>Vol.50,No.1  \u003Cbr>Editorial Office:Department of Philosophy,San Jose State College  \u003Cbr>San Jose,California 95114  \u003Cbr>Business Ofce:1307 Seventh Street,LaSalle,Ilinois  \u003Cbr>Rates:Annual(4 issues)$6.00 for institutions,$4.00 for individuals,single copies,$1.50  \u003Cbr>(foreign postage extra:annual,60 cents,single copies,15 cents)   |\n\nTHE JoURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY  \nINSCRIPTIONS AND INDIRECT DISCOURSE*  \nTN\"An Inscriptional Approach to Indirect Quotation,\"¹IsraelI Scheffler presented an analysis of sentences of the form‘...writes that ---'.He was primarily concerned to give a nominal-istic analysis of indirect discourse which would elude certain ob-jections offered by Church.Here the question is not whetherthe analysis eludes those criticisms.The question is whether theanalysis is correct.I shall argue that it is not  \n1.To discuss Scheffler's analysis I must first repeat his intro-duction of the terms in which it is stated.He reviews an approachto direct quotation and suggests an analogous approach to indirectquotation.  \nWe are invited to follow Goodman in treating so-called'in-seriptions”framed by quotes as conerete general terms rather ","cbCaigZaVgB9Wvom","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigZaVgB9Wvom","pdf",1532227,32,"English","# Inscriptions and Indirect Discourse\n## Scheffler’s Nominalistic Analysis of Indirect Quotation\n## Evaluation of Correctness and Scope","[{\"question\":\"What is the main topic of the provided article section?\",\"answer\":\"The section focuses on an inscriptional approach to indirect quotation and indirect discourse, examining how sentences of the form “writes that …” should be analyzed.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the section describe Scheffler’s approach to indirect quotation?\",\"answer\":\"It explains that Scheffler treats that-clauses as single predicates of concrete inscriptions, where each inscription denoted by a that-clause is a replica of the others, and the that-content is identified as the clause’s content excluding “that”.\"},{\"question\":\"What argument does the author make about Scheffler’s analysis?\",\"answer\":\"The author argues that the analysis is not correct, shifting attention from whether it avoids Church’s objections to whether it truly matches the phenomena it aims to explain.\"}]","VOL.LXI, No.24 - December 24, 1964 - Journal of Philosophy issue articles | PDF",81]