[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-426585-105":59,"doc-detail-426585-en":122},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":115,"head_meta":117,"extra_data":119,"updated_unix":121},105,"en","video-collection-in-public-libraries","Video Collection in Public Libraries","","Video Collection in Public Libraries analyzes how public libraries select, build, and manage video collections, focusing on patron choice, librarian attitudes, and operational constraints. An informal telephone and in-person study using questionnaires and conversations with libraries and a supplier reveals wide diversity in goals, budgeting, placement, handling, and even whether video belongs in public libraries. Findings trace collection growth to cooperative film circuits, vendor promotions, and later sustained patron demand, while recurring challenges include space, security, staffing, pricing, and limits on previewing.",{"@graph":69,"@context":114},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/video-collection-in-public-libraries/426585/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/video-collection-in-public-libraries/426585.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Quinn Holloway","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-16","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What are the main obstacles libraries face when building video collections?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Key obstacles include lack of space, needs for browsing and security, staffing challenges, and the difficulty of making buying decisions in a new, dynamic video industry. Pricing is also frequently cited, along with limited ability to preview and varying reliance on personal knowledge or non-library media experts.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":116,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":118,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":120,"site_id":62},426585,1790767201,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":123},{"doc_id":120,"user_id":124,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":125,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":126,"file_id":127,"file_url":128,"file_type":129,"file_size":130,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":44,"language":131,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":132,"faqs":133,"seo_title":134,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":135,"read_time":136},2336474466712,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","# Video CollectionIn Public Libraries\n\nTacey Dietlmeier  \nScenario The parent promises thechild a video from the local library.The child chooses cotton candy if sheis a girl and future-weaponry if he is aboy.The parent campaigns for Bea-trix Potter,and loses.The parenttries to divert the child's attention toa lovely video that they’ve takenhome before.The child shows com-plete disdain.Finally,desperately,the parent pleads...\"Let's comeback another time,when there ismore selection.\"Fade out,against abackground of shrill protest.  \nElizabeth Crow,in an article for VideoReview,writes that her children namedvideos that they had never seen on a listof their favorites:\"...the ones I want tosee are the ones I haven't already seen.These are my favorites right now.\"Shefinds that children will choose \"in favorof anything new,sparkly,or extensivelyadvertised on television.”(Video Review,July 1986,p.46)  \nI know from experience with my ownchild that the chosen video wllalso bewatched a dozen times in the next twodays.Lack of taste,lack of perspective,mindless submission to advertising,andobsessive viewing by my own child alarmsme.I am even more alarmed that some(apolite,conservative estimate)adults Iknow are not much different from a sixyear old in their approach to video selec-tion.  \nWhat are libraries providing for their pa-trons in the video department?If patronswill not give the situation any thought,perhaps librarians need to give it more.Are librarians doing so?What do theythink about video?Where are libraries-in terms of video-and where are theygoing?  \nThis is aninformal study of video in pub-lic libraries,conducted by telephone andin person,using both a questionnaire andconversations.The survey included:largemetropolitan libraries(nationwide);small to medium size libraries local toConnecticut;networks/circuits in Con-necticut;and a video producer/supplier.  \nAbove all,the study revealed great diver-sity of approach.Every single library hasa different objective in building their col-lection,in the size of collection,place-ment and handling of collection,evendifferent opinions about whether videohas a place in public libraries.  \nHistory has something to do with this di-versity.Libraries have come to includevideo collections via different routes.Anumber of smaller libraries started in acooperative or circuit which was alreadyin place for films,and which began cir-culating packets of video as wellEx-periencing tremendous patron response,the libraries began to buy their ownvideos and soon had their own collec-tions.One library was enticedinto videowhen a vendor offered a special deal on\"renting\"video packets.Soon this ar-rangement was also outgrown.The pointis,that video collections were often be-gun as a taste-and-see experiment ratherthan a wel thought out enterprise.Insome of these cases a passive rather thanactive stance was taken from the begin-ning.A suspicious,rather than venturous,attitude is still in evidence.But patronsare so enamoured of video that there hasnot been need for a more critical ap-proach.  \nLibrarians themselves were not the ini-tiacors of their video collections.Thepush came from two directions:libraryadministrators and patron demand.  \nSeptember 1988  \nThat's not to say that some librariansdidn't cheer,some did.Over the pastthree to four years-the lifetime of mostlibrary video collections-patrondemand has not been satiated nor hasadministrators'enthusiasm flagged.Aregional coordinator states,\"This is ourmost successful program to date.\"Alibrary director admits,\"We've created amonster...an inordinate need.\"He alsoadds that the video collection is“goodpublic relations and has broadened thelibrary's support base.”Administratorsare continuing to give more money andspace to video.  \nStill,some librarians feel that video wasnot their idea.Some give practical reasonsfor their reluctance to embrace video;forexample,\"It could take away from thebook budget.\"Having a video collectiondoes create much extra expense andw","cbCairxdWpJFBSkR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairxdWpJFBSkR","pdf",2518623,"English","# Background and motivation\n## Children’s video choices and adult concerns\n## Research purpose and methods\n# Diversity of library approaches\n## Different routes to building collections\n## Role of administrators and patron demand\n# Attitudes toward video\n## Arguments for and against\n## Media literacy and appropriate use\n# Practical challenges\n## Space, security, and staffing\n## Purchasing decisions and pricing\n## Previewing and information sources","[{\"question\":\"What are the main obstacles libraries face when building video collections?\",\"answer\":\"Key obstacles include lack of space, needs for browsing and security, staffing challenges, and the difficulty of making buying decisions in a new, dynamic video industry. Pricing is also frequently cited, along with limited ability to preview and varying reliance on personal knowledge or non-library media experts.\"}]","Video Collection in Public Libraries | PDF",1790641032,23]