[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-640713-105":59,"doc-detail-640713-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","utah-department-of-corrections-evidence-based-practice-adherence-summary-report-january-2015","Utah Department of Corrections - Evidence-Based Practice Adherence Summary Report - January 2015","","Evidence-Based Practice Adherence Summary Report (January 2015) for the Utah Department of Corrections documents an evaluation of correctional programs using an Evidence-Based Practice quality improvement process. Prepared for the Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice and the Utah Department of Corrections, it describes methods, including program checklist review and director focus groups, then summarizes adherence findings and consolidated responses. The report links results to Utah justice reinvestment goals, provides recommendations, and identifies areas for future consideration.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/utah-department-of-corrections-evidence-based-practice-adherence-summary-report-january-2015/640713/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/utah-department-of-corrections-evidence-based-practice-adherence-summary-report-january-2015/640713.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Genevieve","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-04","2026-10-22",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of this Evidence-Based Practice Adherence Summary Report?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It evaluates Utah correctional programs’ adherence to evidence-based practices using a structured quality improvement process, and then summarizes results to inform recommendations and impact on justice reinvestment efforts.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which key methods does the report use to assess evidence-based practice adherence?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It uses an evidence-based practice adherence program evaluation process, including a correctional program checklist and program director focus group input to gather and consolidate findings.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the report connect its findings to reducing recidivism and program effectiveness?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The report frames program effectiveness around eight principles of effective intervention and examines adherence levels, using results to support recommendations aimed at risk reduction and improved outcomes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},640713,1792710480,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144},1374391974585,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Utah Department of Corrections  \nEvidence-Based Practice Adherence Summary Report  \nPrepared For:  \nUtah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice and  \nUtah Department of Corrections  \nSummary Report January 2015  \nUtah Department of Corrections  \nEvidence-Based Practice Adherence  \nSummary Report  \nJennifer Loeffler-Cobia, M.S.  \nRob Butters Ph.D., LCSW  \nJanuary 2015  \nUtah Criminal Justice Center, University of Utah  \nTable of Contents  \nPage  \nTable of Contents ..........................................................................................................i  \nAcknowledgements ..................................................................................................... ii  \nIntroduction .................................................................................................................. 1  \nBackground ...................................................................................................................2  \nEvidence-Based Practice-Quality Improvement Process .................................3  \nCorrectional Program Checklist ........................................................................4  \nDescription of the Five Participating Programs ................................................7  \nMethods ....................................................................................................................... 10  \nEvidence-Based Practices Adherence Program Evaluations ........................... 10  \nProgram Director Focus Group......................................................................... 11  \nResults ......................................................................................................................... 13  \nSummary of Evidence-Based Practice Adherence Evaluations ....................... 13  \nSummary of Program Director Focus Group Findings ....................................22  \nRecommendations and Impact on Utah Justice Reinvestment Initiative .............29  \nAreas for Future Consideration ...............................................................................34  \nConclusion ..................................................................................................................34  \nReferences ...................................................................................................................36  \nAppendices  \nAppendix 1. EBP-QIP: Nine Stages ...........................................................................38  \nTables  \nTable 1. Types of Programs Assessed for CPC Development .....................................6  \nTable 2. CPC Program Evaluation Dates .................................................................... 10  \nTable 3. Program Participation ................................................................................... 11  \nTable 4. Focus Group Questions ................................................................................. 12  \nTable 5. Consolidated Responses: Focus Group Question 1 ......................................23  \nTable 6. Consolidated Responses: Focus Group Question 2 .....................................25  \nTable 7. Consolidated Responses: Focus Group Question 3 .....................................27  \nFigures  \nFigure 1. National Institute of Correction’s Principles of Effective Intervention ........ 1  \nFigure 2. UCJC EBP-QIP Model ..................................................................................4  \nFigure 3. UDC 2014 Programs’ Area Adherence Avg Compared to National Avg ... 14  \nAcknowledgements  \nWe would like to thank the Utah Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice (CCJJ), Utah Department of Corrections (UDC) and Craig Burr, UDC Director of Programming, for their ongoing support and for allowing the Utah Criminal Justice Center (UCJC) the opportunity to complete the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) program evaluations with Utah prisons and jail programs, as well as entrusting UCJC to provide ongoing consultation and quality","cbCainV4lm3z5Zve","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainV4lm3z5Zve","pdf",985830,43,"English","# Introduction\n## Background\n## Evidence-Based Practice-Quality Improvement Process\n## Correctional Program Checklist\n## Description of the Five Participating Programs\n# Methods\n## Evidence-Based Practices Adherence Program Evaluations\n## Program Director Focus Group\n# Results\n## Summary of Evidence-Based Practice Adherence Evaluations\n## Summary of Program Director Focus Group Findings\n# Recommendations and Impact on Utah Justice Reinvestment Initiative\n## Areas for Future Consideration\n# Conclusion\n# References\n# Appendices\n## Appendix 1. EBP-QIP: Nine Stages","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of this Evidence-Based Practice Adherence Summary Report?\",\"answer\":\"It evaluates Utah correctional programs’ adherence to evidence-based practices using a structured quality improvement process, and then summarizes results to inform recommendations and impact on justice reinvestment efforts.\"},{\"question\":\"Which key methods does the report use to assess evidence-based practice adherence?\",\"answer\":\"It uses an evidence-based practice adherence program evaluation process, including a correctional program checklist and program director focus group input to gather and consolidate findings.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report connect its findings to reducing recidivism and program effectiveness?\",\"answer\":\"The report frames program effectiveness around eight principles of effective intervention and examines adherence levels, using results to support recommendations aimed at risk reduction and improved outcomes.\"}]","Utah Department of Corrections - Evidence-Based Practice Adherence Summary Report - January 2015 | PDF",108]