[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-455700-105":59,"doc-detail-455700-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","university-of-ottawa-independent-review-report-phase-2-executive-summary","University of Ottawa - Independent Review Report - Phase 2 - Executive Summary","","An independent review report for the University of Ottawa Protection Services examines a June 12, 2019 incident reported on Twitter, in which a student alleged harassment and discrimination based on race while on campus. The mandate for the Phase 2 work focuses on whether university policies and procedures are up to date as they relate to protection services, including potential specific or systemic negative impacts on historically disadvantaged, particularly racialized, community members. The review also assesses how the Trespass to Property Act (TPA) is applied and whether those impacts arise.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/university-of-ottawa-independent-review-report-phase-2-executive-summary/455700/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/university-of-ottawa-independent-review-report-phase-2-executive-summary/455700.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Mabel","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-08","2026-09-30",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of the Phase 2 Independent Review Report?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It reviews whether the University’s policies and procedures related to Protection Services are up to date, and it assesses specific and/or systemic negative impacts on historically disadvantaged, especially racialized, community members. It also reviews how the Trespass to Property Act (TPA) is applied.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What incident prompted the investigation discussed in the report?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"A June 12, 2019 incident was reported via a student’s Twitter posts, alleging harassment and discrimination based on race while the student was on campus.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the Phase 2 mandate differ from Phase 1?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Phase 1 focused on the incident itself, including findings of fact and law. Phase 2 shifts to a reviewer role that examines broader systemic implications tied to Protection Services and related policies and procedures.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},455700,1791433805,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},7971474920318,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/74000ee537e6b0ca360?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1788430171632181674","PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL  \nINDEPENDENT REVIEW  \nUniversity of Ottawa Protection Services  \nEsi Codjoe, Investigator Turnpenney Milne LLP  \n501 – 2 Berkeley Street Toronto, Ontario 416-868-1457, extension 113  \n[esi@tmllp.ca](esi@tmllp.ca)  \nDate: January 28, 2020  \nUniversity of Ottawa – Independent Review Report  \nTABLE OF CONTENTS  \n1 MANDATE AND AUTHORITY .......................................................................................................3  \n2 REVIEW PROCESS .......................................................................................................................4  \n3 SUMMARY OF THE ISSUES ..........................................................................................................5  \n4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS...........................................................................................6  \n1. SUMMARY ISSUE 1 ...............................................................................................................................................6  \n2. SUMMARY ISSUE 2 ...............................................................................................................................................6  \n3. SUMMARY ISSUE 3 ...............................................................................................................................................6  \n5 CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION......................................................................................................6  \n6 SUMMARY OF REVIEW .............................................................................................................22  \nISSUE 1: ARE THE UNIVERSITY’S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES UP TO DATE AS THEY RELATE TO PROTECTION SERVICES? .....................22  \nISSUE 2: ARE THERE ANY SPECIFIC AND/OR NEGATIVE IMPACTS IN THE APPLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY’S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ON COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHO BELONG TO HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED GROUPS, AND SPECIFICALLY THOSE WHO BELONG TO RACIALIZED COMMUNITIES? ...........................................................................................................................................24  \nISSUE 3: ARE THERE ANY SPECIFIC AND/OR SYSTEMIC NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHO BELONG TO HISTORICALLY DISADVANTAGED GROUPS, AND SPECIFICALLY THOSE WHO BELONG TO RACIALIZED COMMUNITIES IN THE APPLICATION OF THE TRESPASS TO PROPERTY ACT (“TPA”)? .........................................................................................................................................28  \n7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................32  \nPrivileged and Confidential Page 2 of 34  \nUniversity of Ottawa – Independent Review Report  \n1 MANDATE AND AUTHORITY  \nTurnpenney Milne LLP was retained on June 18, 2019 by Noël Badiou, Director of the Human Rights Office, at The University of Ottawa (“the University”), to investigate information shared on Twitter, a social networking website, by a University student (“the Student”) . The information from the Student’s Twitter feed indicates that he was subject to harassment and discrimination because of race, while he was present on the University campus. The incident in question occurred on June 12, 2019. The Student did not file a formal complaint with the University, though as outlined in the Twitter thread, he tweeted at the University’s Twitter account/ !s the Student did not provide a formal complaint pursuant to either of University procedures 36-1 (Complaints of Harassment/Discrimination initiated by students) or 36-2 (Complaints of Harassment/Discrimination initiated by employees), the University initiated an Investigation to further its obligations under its Policy 67a “Prevention of Harassment and Discrimination”/  \nThe University’s mandate pertaining to the June 12, 2019 incident outlines a two-step process. First, the Investigator is to submit an initial report (the “Phase 1 Report”) that addr","cbCailhV9ARNcmle","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailhV9ARNcmle","pdf",935834,34,"English","# Table of Contents\n## Mandate and Authority\n## Review Process\n## Summary of the Issues\n## Executive Summary of Findings\n## Contextual Information\n## Summary of Review\n## Recommendations and Conclusions","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Phase 2 Independent Review Report?\",\"answer\":\"It reviews whether the University’s policies and procedures related to Protection Services are up to date, and it assesses specific and/or systemic negative impacts on historically disadvantaged, especially racialized, community members. It also reviews how the Trespass to Property Act (TPA) is applied.\"},{\"question\":\"What incident prompted the investigation discussed in the report?\",\"answer\":\"A June 12, 2019 incident was reported via a student’s Twitter posts, alleging harassment and discrimination based on race while the student was on campus.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the Phase 2 mandate differ from Phase 1?\",\"answer\":\"Phase 1 focused on the incident itself, including findings of fact and law. Phase 2 shifts to a reviewer role that examines broader systemic implications tied to Protection Services and related policies and procedures.\"}]","University of Ottawa - Independent Review Report - Phase 2 - Executive Summary | PDF",1790743905,86]