[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-598122-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-598122-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","truths-wounded-innocence-and-the-post-truth-syndrome-paper","Truths, Wounded Innocence, and the Post-truth Syndrome - Paper","","Kent den Heyer examines the political discourse framed as “post-truth” and argues that such narratives can function as a liberal nostalgia story that constructs a lost consensus and shifts blame. The discussion critiques claims that contemporary “fake news” is primarily driven by recent political events while ignoring deeper anti-intellectual and power-laden structures. It analyzes implications for history education, research, knowledge, evidence, and calls for re-examination within scholarly and public deliberations.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/truths-wounded-innocence-and-the-post-truth-syndrome-paper/598122/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/truths-wounded-innocence-and-the-post-truth-syndrome-paper/598122.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Indoniesian Boy","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What does the “post-truth” framing represent in the document?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It represents a narrative that suggests politics and media have shifted away from truth, but the author questions when such “truth-driven” politics ever truly existed and emphasizes how power relations shape truths.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How does the author describe the “wounded innocence” narrative?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"The author argues it is a type of liberal nostalgia narrative that constructs a never-existing consensus and assigns blame for perceived losses, while de-politicized education proposals continue unchanged.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What are the document’s main concerns for history education?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It stresses the need to revisit stances on truth and re-examine research and knowledge, interpretation and evidence, community and nation, identity and difference, and citizenship and solidarity.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},598122,1792086327,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":102,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":143,"preview_page_count":4},962090760608,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","den Heyer, 2018 Canadian Social Studies, Volume 50, No. 2  \nTruths, Wounded Innocence, and the Post-truth Syndrome  \nKent den Heyer, University of Alberta  \nProfessor  \nDepartment of Secondary Education  \nUniversity of Alberta  \n[kdenheye@ualberta.ca](kdenheye@ualberta.ca)  \n[W]hen I hear people denounce our political scene as \"post-truth,\" I have to wonder when exactly they think it was that politics was determined by the truth? The same goes for those who decry today's \"fake news.\" […]To claim that with Trump's election we've entered a post-truth era of fake news is to claim that the  \nU.S. was built on truthful politics and media. Political struggle isn't really about an existing truth but rather concerns the formulation of new truths and, more importantly, the materialization of those truths […] The political project involves the power relations that compose truths, and the pedagogical project  \ninvolves how we engage ourselves, each other, and the world in transformative processes. (Ford, 2018, paras. 1-4)  \nThis quotation captures my concern with an emergent liberal nostalgia narrative, a type of wounded innocence, fashionable in response to what many see as a contemporary affliction affecting democratic institutions. According to this story, Trump and his administration have moved us into post-truth times. As definitive nostalgia, this posttruth narrative constructs a never existing political consensus that has now been lost, from the functioning of formal politics to truth claims found in the academe.  \nLaments aside, North American academic life has always suffered from an antiintellectual cultural strain. In the US context one can read historian Richard Hofstadter’s (1963) Anti-intellectualism in American Life, Chris Lash’s (1995) The Revolt of the Elitesand The Betrayal of Democracy, also detailed by Susan Jacoby in her 2008 work The Age of American Unreason. In Canada, one can read the same claims in John Raulston Saul’s Voltaire’s Bastards (1992) and The Unconscious Civilization (1995) or John McMurtry’s (1998) Unequal Freedoms: The global market as an ethical system, for example. One has to ask about those suffering post-truth syndrome, where have you been and what have you been reading?  \nI suspect that those who advance this narrative constitute that large part of theacademe that have never taken white supremacy, imperialism, or patriarchy seriously as part of their scholarship or curriculum proposals. Now, they dispense that Trump, along with the unwitting support of pomo/poco/postructural scholarship (relevant distinctions between these orientations to analysis are seldom made), is to blame for the current tribulation. This is an odd claim given that those who cast it also assert that these forms of scholarship have had, at the same time, little discernable public impact.  \nAs one example, Peter Seixas (2018) writes that “academics hardly needed to rally to defend the idea of truth because the only threat was from some of our own poststructuralist provocateurs, delivered in prose so tortured that it had little apparent impact on the broader public sphere”(p. 14). Yet, despite having little apparent impact,  \nden Heyer, 2018 Canadian Social Studies, Volume 50, No. 2  \nSeixas goes on to tell readers,“When the Trump administration began in 2017 with a flurry of unsubstantiated allegations and ‘alternative facts’ rhetoric, the game changed and the stakes were raised”(p. 14) . In other words, the accused was never actually at the public scene of the crime and everyone actually at the scene is innocent of any contribution to what has transpired! Interesting logic.  \nSeixas (2018) continues,“The implications for history education and its scholars, internationally, are profound”(p. 14). How profound?“If we need to revisit our stanceson the concept of truth, so too do we need to re-examine those on research and knowledge, interpretation and evidence, community and nation, identity and difference, and citizenship and s","cbCaip5pqqiLFmyj","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaip5pqqiLFmyj","pdf",138118,"English","# Truths, Wounded Innocence, and the Post-truth Syndrome\n## Post-truth framing and political power\n## Anti-intellectual cultural strain and academic debates\n## Implications for history education and re-examination\n## Liberal educational responses and epistemological critique\n## Truths and Sophistry","[{\"question\":\"What does the “post-truth” framing represent in the document?\",\"answer\":\"It represents a narrative that suggests politics and media have shifted away from truth, but the author questions when such “truth-driven” politics ever truly existed and emphasizes how power relations shape truths.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the author describe the “wounded innocence” narrative?\",\"answer\":\"The author argues it is a type of liberal nostalgia narrative that constructs a never-existing consensus and assigns blame for perceived losses, while de-politicized education proposals continue unchanged.\"},{\"question\":\"What are the document’s main concerns for history education?\",\"answer\":\"It stresses the need to revisit stances on truth and re-examine research and knowledge, interpretation and evidence, community and nation, identity and difference, and citizenship and solidarity.\"}]","Truths, Wounded Innocence, and the Post-truth Syndrome - Paper | PDF",15]