[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-592620-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-592620-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","transitional-bilingual-education-and-two-way-immersion-programs-comparison-of-reading-outcomes-for-english-learners","Transitional Bilingual Education and Two-Way Immersion Programs - Comparison of Reading Outcomes for English Learners","","A review compares reading outcomes for English learners across two major U.S. bilingual models: Transitional Bilingual Education and Two-Way Immersion. The study frames bilingual program popularity through theory and historical context, then addresses whether student outcomes differ and which program offers advantages, alongside strategies that enhance benefits for English learners. Using quality-article selection and a five-component effectiveness model, findings indicate reading differences may be non-significant, bilingual programs are not harmful, and additional benefits support literacy and classroom practices.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/transitional-bilingual-education-and-two-way-immersion-programs-comparison-of-reading-outcomes-for-english-learners/592620/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/transitional-bilingual-education-and-two-way-immersion-programs-comparison-of-reading-outcomes-for-english-learners/592620.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Mimi","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-20","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",5,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the main purpose of the review?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"To compare reading outcomes for English learners between Transitional Bilingual Education and Two-Way Immersion programs, including potential advantages and supporting strategies.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How do the two program types differ in instruction?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Transitional Bilingual Education focuses on moving students from their native language to English with native-language components and supports, while Two-Way Immersion places native and non-native speakers together with reading instruction in both languages.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What do the review findings suggest about reading outcomes?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The review reports that differences on reading outcomes may be non-significant, and bilingual programs are not detrimental to English learners, with additional benefits beyond reading enhancement.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},592620,1792172208,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},2336477974920,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Athens Journal of Education-Volume 5, Issue 4 – Pages 423-444  \nTransitional Bilingual Education and Two-Way Immersion Programs: Comparison of Reading Outcomes for English Learners in the United  \nStates  \nBy Paul Polanco􀀍  \nDoris Luft de Baker†  \nThe purpose of this review is to provide a comparison of reading outcomes of the two most popular bilingual programs in the United States: Transitional Bilingual Education and Two-way Bilingual programs. To provide context, we present a theoretical framework and a brief historical perspective on how these programs came to gain popularity. We explored two questions. The first one asks whether there are differences in student outcomes between the programs and whether there are advantages of one program over the other. The second question looks into practical strategies that make these programs beneficial to English learners. For selection methods, we used the previous definition of high-quality articles that included clear outcomes and program definitions. For evaluation of the programs, we used a five-framework model that defines effective bilingual programs that incorporates components of second language literacy development, highquality instruction, and precise definition of the sample population. After the careful review of articles, academic outcomes are presented, indicating that while there might be non-significant differences on reading outcomes, bilingual programs are not detrimental to English learners and there are additional benefits to having a bilingual program beyond potentially enhancing reading outcomes. Also, we found that strategies that work well in a general education classroom for native speakers, also work well for English learners. Finally, we provide recommendations for program development and future research.  \nKeywords: bilingualism, transitional bilingual education, immersion program, bilingual education, dual-language program.  \nIntroduction  \nMore than 20 percent of the U.S. population speaks a foreign language at home (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010) . The most significant group is the Spanishspeaking population, which makes about 50 percent of the population speaking a foreign language at home (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010) . As this population subgroup expands, it is necessary to provide a system that promotes its educational success. By addressing the academic needs of these students, we can support social efficiency and social mobility by ensuring that we have a workforce ready to fully integrate into the economic engine (Labaree, 1997; August & Shanahan 2006) .  \n􀀍PhD Student, Southern Methodist University, USA.  \n†Assistant Professor, Southern. Methodist University, USA.  \n[https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.5-4-5](https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.5-4-5) doi=10.30958/aje.5-4-5  \nVol. 5, No. 4 Polanco et al.: Transitional Bilingual Education and Two-Way…  \nOver several years, there has been a debate on finding the best ways to instruct bilingual students. Through history, we have seen that the perceptions toward bilingualism are strictly related to the political environment in which they develop (Baker, Basaraba, & Polanco, 2016) . In the literature, we find two predominant perceptions toward bilingualism. First, language-as-problem focuses on replacing the first -native-language (L1) of the student and places emphasis on the second language (L2) . Researchers of bilingual education often refer to this perception as the subtractive model of bilingualism (Baker, 2011) . Second, language-as-resource or additive model, focusing on using the L1 of the student as a resource for developing the L2 (Crawford, 1998) . These diverging views have led to the development of various bilingual programs that are worth examining carefully to understand the purpose of each program and its effect on student academic outcomes.  \nIn this paper, we compare and contrast the reading outcomes of English programs and two commonly used bilingual programs, Transitional Bilingual Education (TBE) an","cbCaimltutW4pQAo","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimltutW4pQAo","pdf",446063,22,"English","# Introduction\n## Purpose and research questions\n## Theoretical perspectives on bilingualism\n# Brief History of Bilingual Programs\n# Program descriptions and reading outcomes","[{\"question\":\"What is the main purpose of the review?\",\"answer\":\"To compare reading outcomes for English learners between Transitional Bilingual Education and Two-Way Immersion programs, including potential advantages and supporting strategies.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the two program types differ in instruction?\",\"answer\":\"Transitional Bilingual Education focuses on moving students from their native language to English with native-language components and supports, while Two-Way Immersion places native and non-native speakers together with reading instruction in both languages.\"},{\"question\":\"What do the review findings suggest about reading outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"The review reports that differences on reading outcomes may be non-significant, and bilingual programs are not detrimental to English learners, with additional benefits beyond reading enhancement.\"}]","Transitional Bilingual Education and Two-Way Immersion Programs - Comparison of Reading Outcomes for English Learners | PDF",1792074960,55]