[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31459":3,"doc-seo-31459":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31459,1374391974585,"Genevieve","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",8,"Research & Report","Traditional versus Magnetic-Controlled Growth Rods for Early Onset Scoliosis Treatment","Study compares magnetic-controlled growing rods (MCGR) and traditional growing rods (TGR) for early onset scoliosis across the full growth-sparing pathway, from pre-implantation through graduation with definitive fusion or final lengthening. Patients treated at one institution (2010–2022) are assessed using radiographic spine length and curve correction at multiple checkpoints, alongside EOSQ-24 patient-reported outcomes, pulmonary function tests, and recorded complications. Results evaluate whether lengthening and deformity correction differ, and whether physiologic and quality-of-life measures remain stable after treatment completion.","cbCaidOxftWC28bM","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidOxftWC28bM","pdf",835431,1,10,"English","en","# Methods\n## Study population and follow-up time points\n# Results\n## Radiographic length and curve correction\n## Patient-reported outcomes and pulmonary function\n## Complications","[{\"question\":\"What is the main goal of the study comparing MCGR and TGR?\",\"answer\":\"To compare how magnetic-controlled and traditional growing rods perform for early onset scoliosis after graduation, focusing on spine length, curve correction, and related patient outcomes.\"},{\"question\":\"How are outcomes measured in the study?\",\"answer\":\"Radiographic spine lengths (T1–T12 and T1–S1) and curve magnitude are recorded at multiple times; EOSQ-24 scores, pulmonary function tests, and complications are also collected.\"},{\"question\":\"What trade-off does the study report between TGR and MCGR?\",\"answer\":\"TGR achieves greater lengthening, but it is associated with more complications and more UPRORs than MCGR, while MCGR shows smaller curves after definitive fusion and modest EOSQ-24 improvements.\"}]",1779483761,25,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"traditional-versus-magnetic-controlled-growth-rods-for-early-onset-scoliosis-treatment","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/traditional-versus-magnetic-controlled-growth-rods-for-early-onset-scoliosis-treatment/31459/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-22",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What is the main goal of the study comparing MCGR and TGR?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"To compare how magnetic-controlled and traditional growing rods perform for early onset scoliosis after graduation, focusing on spine length, curve correction, and related patient outcomes.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How are outcomes measured in the study?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Radiographic spine lengths (T1–T12 and T1–S1) and curve magnitude are recorded at multiple times; EOSQ-24 scores, pulmonary function tests, and complications are also collected.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What trade-off does the study report between TGR and MCGR?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"TGR achieves greater lengthening, but it is associated with more complications and more UPRORs than MCGR, while MCGR shows smaller curves after definitive fusion and modest EOSQ-24 improvements.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]