[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-324733-105":59,"doc-detail-324733-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","to-recommendations-of-equality-rights-sub-committee-amendments-to-canadian-human-rights-act-chra","TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF EQUALITY RIGHTS SUB-COMMITTEE - Amendments to Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA)","","Document内容围绕“平等权利分委员会”的建议，提出对《加拿大人权法》（CHRA）的多项修订方向，并给出政府拟定回应要点。重点包括：对“优先条款/凌驾条款”、合理便利义务、系统性歧视的明确禁止、取消强制退休的相关安排、扩大适用范围，以及新增性取向、政治信念与刑事定罪/指控等禁止歧视事由。文中同时呈现国防部（DND）的反对理由与关键点：担忧权力从议会与法院转移至CHRC与裁判庭、审查标准偏离宪章，并可能产生对国家重要议题与既有制度的影响。",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/to-recommendations-of-equality-rights-sub-committee-amendments-to-canadian-human-rights-act-chra/324733/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/to-recommendations-of-equality-rights-sub-committee-amendments-to-canadian-human-rights-act-chra/324733.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"River Wang","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"这份材料提出了哪些与CHRA修订相关的方向？","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"材料围绕优先条款、合理便利义务、明确禁止系统性歧视、调整强制退休相关规定，以及新增若干禁止歧视事由（如性取向、政治信念、刑事定罪或指控）等方向提出建议与拟议回应要点。","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"政府对“合理便利（reasonable accommodation）”的态度是什么？",{"text":117,"@type":113},"政府原则上同意将CHRA修订以纳入“合理便利”，并表示鉴于近期最高法院判决，需要进一步讨论如何在CHRA中落实这一内容。",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"DND反对CHRA修订的核心理由是什么？",{"text":121,"@type":113},"DND担忧CHRC与人权裁判庭可能获得对联邦法律效力的审查权（包括优先条款影响），并认为新增禁止歧视事由会扩大相关政策被审查、推翻的范围；同时指出审查逻辑与《权利与自由宪章》相比可能存在不利差异。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},324733,1790377086,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},1099514067438,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539ee87300030?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780474512215547542","# TO RECOMMENDATIONS OFEQUALITY RIGHTS SUB-COMMITTEE\n\n## Subject\n\n# Amendments to Canadian Human Rights Act(CHRA).Proposed Government Response to Recommendations forCHRA amendments:\n\na.  to add primacy or override clause to CHRA.The Government of Canada agrees that humanrights legislation should in general haveprimacy over other laws.  The Department ofJustice is conducting a review of the CHRA,considering whether it is necessary,in viewof The Supreme Court decision in WinnipegSchool Division No.1 vs Craton,to amendthis act;  \nb.  to oblige employers to make\"reasonableaccommodation\"in response to needs ofemployees protected from discrimination underterms of CHRA.    The Government of Canadaagrees in principle that the CHRA should beamended to incorporate \"reasonable accommod-ation\"。In light of recent Supreme Courtdecisions,further consideration will haveto be given to the best way to amend the CHRAto include reasonable accommodation;  \nC.to ensure CHRA covers systemic discrimination.Supreme Court decision in Bhinder vs CNR heldthat systemic discrimination is prohibited byCHRA。Justice Department is consideringamending the CHRA to state expressly thatadverse effect discrimination is prohibited;  \na.    to anolisn mandatory retirement by removinqdefence mechanisms under section 9(2)  \n(membership in organization)and section 14(c)(normal age of retirement)from CHRA.  TheGovernment agrees in principle with thisrecommendation.  Government wil1 consult withprivate sector employers and employee organ-izations to determine the most effective way to  \nimplement.  Government would accompanyimplementation with transitional rules toensure orderly abolition in private sector;  \ne.  to apply CHRA to all mandatory retirement  \npolicies embodied in legislation,regulationsand orders.The Government agrees in principle,but action must await a re-examination ofdefences available under CHRA.  Before  \nimplementing this recommendation,the Govern-ment will identify any possible cases wheremandatory retirement could be justified underthe Charter of Rights and Freedoms(the Charter)and decide how these exceptions will be dealtwith in the CHRA.  \nf.to add sexual orientation to CHRA asprohibited grounds of discrimination.  \nGovernment will ask Parliament to amend CHRAto make sexual orientation a prohibitedground of discrimination.  The Governmenthas decided that the CF and RCMP will beexempted from this amendment;and  \ng.to add political belief and criminal convictionor criminai charges to CHRA as prohibitedgrounds of discrimination.  Government wil1consider this recommendation as part of JusticeDepartment review of the CHRA.Governmentbelieves a closer examination of potentialimpact is required.  \nDND Position  \nDND is opposed to these amendments because:  \na.Canadian Human Rights Commission(CHRC)andHuman Rights Tribunals,appointed non-judicial bodies,would have the power toconsider the validity of federal laws(primacy clause);and  \nb.  each addition to the proscribed grounds ofdiscrimination increases areas in whichpolicies important to national objectives aresubject to_review and overturning under narrowscrutiny of CHRA by appointed tribunals,ratherthan broader scrutiny under the Charter bycourts of law;  \na.  The wording of the Charter indicates an intentto address the balance of individual rightsagainst the collective rights of societywhile CHRA focusses on individual rightsvis-a-vis the requirements of a specificoccupations;  \nb.The CHRA does not contain a general provisionlike section one of the Charter which permitsa reasonable limitation on rights;  \nc.  The bona fide justification and bona fideoccupational requirement defences of theCHRA are not as broad as reasonable limitsunder the Charter;  \nd.  Consistent with the purpose of the CHRA,newgrounds of discrimination would be givenbroad interpretation while defences andexemptions would be given narrow inter-pretation;  \ne.  As a general principle reviewing courts arecautious and sensitive in exerc","cbCaitoaUhCXisRc","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitoaUhCXisRc","pdf",758898,"English","# Subject\n# Amendments to Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA). Proposed Government Response to Recommendations for CHRA amendments\n## DND Position\n## Key Points\n## Recommendation","[{\"question\":\"这份材料提出了哪些与CHRA修订相关的方向？\",\"answer\":\"材料围绕优先条款、合理便利义务、明确禁止系统性歧视、调整强制退休相关规定，以及新增若干禁止歧视事由（如性取向、政治信念、刑事定罪或指控）等方向提出建议与拟议回应要点。\"},{\"question\":\"政府对“合理便利（reasonable accommodation）”的态度是什么？\",\"answer\":\"政府原则上同意将CHRA修订以纳入“合理便利”，并表示鉴于近期最高法院判决，需要进一步讨论如何在CHRA中落实这一内容。\"},{\"question\":\"DND反对CHRA修订的核心理由是什么？\",\"answer\":\"DND担忧CHRC与人权裁判庭可能获得对联邦法律效力的审查权（包括优先条款影响），并认为新增禁止歧视事由会扩大相关政策被审查、推翻的范围；同时指出审查逻辑与《权利与自由宪章》相比可能存在不利差异。\"}]","TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF EQUALITY RIGHTS SUB-COMMITTEE - Amendments to Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) | PDF",1789968730,13]