[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33871-en":3,"doc-seo-33871-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33871,1099514067438,"River Wang","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539ee87300030?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780474512215547542",2,"Literature","Three Philosophical Filmmakers: Hitchcock, Welles, Renoir","Three Philosophical Filmmakers examines how cinematic art draws on the creative expression of insights into the human condition by linking meaning and technique. Irving Singer addresses questions of aesthetics and ontology, arguing that problems in art and film disintegrate when their dependence is recognized. The book’s burden is straightforward: apply Singer’s approach to Hitchcock, Welles, and Renoir, chosen for their craft mastery and diversity, after an initial chapter clarifies their significance.","","cbCaih0ShTrhhK6a","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaih0ShTrhhK6a","pdf",59031636,1,290,"English","en",105,"# Preface\n## Some Preliminary Remarks\n# Alfred Hitchcock\n# Orson Welles\n# Jean Renoir\n# A Family Portrait\n# Notes\n# Index","[{\"question\":\"What is the main approach of Three Philosophical Filmmakers?\",\"answer\":\"The book argues that aesthetics and ontology issues in art and film break down once meaning and technique are recognized as interdependent. Singer applies this approach to the three filmmakers.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does Irving Singer choose Hitchcock, Welles, and Renoir?\",\"answer\":\"They are presented as masters of their craft and are also described as diverse among themselves, making them useful subjects for illustrating Singer’s claims.\"},{\"question\":\"How does Singer clarify his use of “humanism” in relation to film?\",\"answer\":\"Singer says reviewers characterized a related work as philosophical “humanism,” but that term is misleading without clarification. In this book, humanism is an attempt to show how cinematic art relies on different creative insights into the human condition.\"}]",1782216897,447,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":27},"three-philosophical-filmmakers-hitchcock-welles-renoir",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/three-philosophical-filmmakers-hitchcock-welles-renoir/33871/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What is the main approach of Three Philosophical Filmmakers?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"The book argues that aesthetics and ontology issues in art and film break down once meaning and technique are recognized as interdependent. Singer applies this approach to the three filmmakers.","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"Why does Irving Singer choose Hitchcock, Welles, and Renoir?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"They are presented as masters of their craft and are also described as diverse among themselves, making them useful subjects for illustrating Singer’s claims.",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"How does Singer clarify his use of “humanism” in relation to film?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"Singer says reviewers characterized a related work as philosophical “humanism,” but that term is misleading without clarification. In this book, humanism is an attempt to show how cinematic art relies on different creative insights into the human condition.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]