[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-206736-105":59,"doc-detail-206736-en":124},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":117,"head_meta":119,"extra_data":121,"updated_unix":123},105,"en","the-raw-marks-nsead-survey-report-marking-review-timeline-and-findings","The Raw Marks NSEAD Survey Report - Marking Review Timeline and Findings","","The Raw Marks NSEAD Survey Report examines the impact of giving centre-assessed raw marks for art and design GCSE and GCE on teachers and learners. It documents how the raw marks process was rolled out, summarizes available guidance, and incorporates feedback from NSEAD’s member forum alongside qualitative and quantitative results from a teacher survey. The report highlights unintended consequences, including increased learner anxiety, added teacher workload, and effects on professionalism, concluding that an independent subject-specific review is urgently needed and that the process should end as soon as possible.",{"@graph":69,"@context":116},[70,84,99],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-raw-marks-nsead-survey-report-marking-review-timeline-and-findings/206736/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"author":86,"headline":65,"publisher":89,"fileFormat":92,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":93,"datePublished":93,"encodingFormat":92,"isAccessibleForFree":94,"interactionStatistic":95},"DigitalDocument",{"name":87,"@type":88},"Dipper","Person",{"url":74,"name":90,"@type":91},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-05",true,{"@type":96,"interactionType":97,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":98},"ViewAction",{"@type":100,"mainEntity":101},"FAQPage",[102,108,112],{"name":103,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":105},"What is the purpose of the Raw Marks NSEAD survey report?","Question",{"text":106,"@type":107},"To identify the impact on teachers and learners of giving centre-assessed raw marks to art and design GCSE and GCE candidates.","Answer",{"name":109,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What unintended consequences does the report highlight?",{"text":111,"@type":107},"The report identifies unintended consequences, especially affecting teachers and learners, and argues that a subject-specific review is needed.",{"name":113,"@type":104,"acceptedAnswer":114},"What does the report recommend regarding the raw marks process?",{"text":115,"@type":107},"It calls for the process of giving raw marks to end as soon as possible, and if it continues, for an urgent independent subject-specific review.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":118,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":90,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":120,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":122,"site_id":62},206736,1788595788,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":125},{"doc_id":122,"user_id":126,"nickname":87,"user_avatar":127,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":128,"file_id":129,"file_url":130,"file_type":131,"file_size":132,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":46,"language":133,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":134,"faqs":135,"seo_title":136,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":123,"read_time":31},1374404997633,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","The Raw Marks NSEAD Survey Report  \nRaw Marks is a National Society for Education in Art and Design (NSEAD) survey report which aims to identify the impact on teachers and learners of giving centreassessed raw marks to art and design GCSE and GCE candidates.  \nThis report includes a timeline to map how the process of giving raw marks to students was initially rolled out, together with the guidance that is available to support the process. We have included feedback from NSEAD’s member forum and qualitative and quantitative data from our Raw Marks teacher survey. This report concludes that an independent subject-specific review of the process is urgently needed, and given our findings, that the process ends as soon as possible.  \nForeword  \nThe Raw Marks Survey Report has identified a number of unintended consequences – with the process and giving all marks to art and design students impacting most on teachers and learners. The report reflects the overwhelming need for a subject-specific review of the procedure. Art and design teachers are calling for change.  \nWe believe that the well-intended initiative to increase the transparency of the assessment process, is now having a detrimental impact on the very people it wished to help , our learners.  \nTime and time again, year on year, and now in this survey, we have learned of candidates receiving their marks and experiencing high levels of anxiety before or even on days when they are sitting exams in other subjects. Teachers report that many of their candidates mistakenly convert their marks to a ‘final’ grade using grade boundaries that are easily accessed online from previous years. Our survey also shows the impact on teacher workload and wellbeing; and that the process can detrimentally impact on teacher professionalism. All this, just when our subject is facing a teacher recruitment and a retention crisis.  \nWe also ask, is the procedure fair? Meaning which socio-economic groups are more likely to question their marks, and which groups therefore will more often have their marks favourably changed? Until our questions are answered, we call for the process of giving raw marks to students to end. Should it continue at all, an urgent subject-specific review of the process cannot come soon enough.  \nMichele Gregson  \nGeneral secretary and CEO of NSEAD  \nContents  \n• Timeline for the process of giving raw marks to students  \n• Introduction  \n• Survey report summary: Results and findings  \n• Raw marks survey report recommendations  \n• Appendix: Survey questions, quotes and results  \nTimeline for the process of giving raw marks to students  \ni. 1993-2016 – Principal Learning and Project Code of Practice  \nThis JCQ Code of Practice required centres (schools and colleges) to have appeals procedures relating to teacher marked assessments in place, and that marked assessments would be available to candidates. It did not expressly require that students were given their raw marks.  \nii. 10 December 2015 and 11 March 2016 – Consultation for marking reviews begins on behalf of Ofqual  \nThe consultation included centre-based examination marking reviews. Subjects represented by respondents are not identified. See consultation findings below in iii.  \niii. May 2016 – An analysis of consultation responses: marking reviews, appeals, grade boundaries and Code of Practice, AlphaPlus Consultancy Ltd* .  \nThe 111-page report included 91 responses; 19 teachers for personal responses; 20 school / college or academy chains; 1348 student responses. The process of review was surveyed. No explicit mention whatsoever is made of the teacher marking of non-examined assessment (NEA) internally or externally set components which is unique to art and design GCSE/AS/A level. Comments regarding marking reviews included: Concerns about workloads in schools , and thereview of ‘marked scripts’ when they were returned; the potential requirement of submitting work earlier to allow time for centre-based review of marks ","cbCaidXStxkwB847","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidXStxkwB847","pdf",487829,"English","# Foreword\n## Timeline for the process of giving raw marks to students\n## Contents\n## Introduction\n## Survey report summary: Results and findings\n## Raw marks survey report recommendations\n## Appendix: Survey questions, quotes and results","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the Raw Marks NSEAD survey report?\",\"answer\":\"To identify the impact on teachers and learners of giving centre-assessed raw marks to art and design GCSE and GCE candidates.\"},{\"question\":\"What unintended consequences does the report highlight?\",\"answer\":\"The report identifies unintended consequences, especially affecting teachers and learners, and argues that a subject-specific review is needed.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the report recommend regarding the raw marks process?\",\"answer\":\"It calls for the process of giving raw marks to end as soon as possible, and if it continues, for an urgent independent subject-specific review.\"}]","The Raw Marks NSEAD Survey Report - Marking Review Timeline and Findings | PDF"]