[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33928-en":3,"doc-seo-33928-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33928,2336464648746,"Skyler","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c",2,"Literature","The Principles of Psychology, Vols. 1 & 2","A Harvard University Press edition of William James’s The Principles of Psychology, featuring publication notes and a contextual introduction that frames the work as a cornerstone of American intellectual history. The introduction by George A. Miller traces psychology’s emergence from philosophical speculation into a science, highlighting the roles of Wilhelm Wundt and James in laboratory and experimental approaches, and situating their efforts within broader rationalist versus empiricist traditions. Includes tables of contents and reference aids such as a pagination key.","","cbCaigk76egMYnWd","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigk76egMYnWd","pdf",20144739,1,1312,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n## Psychology as a science\n## Two origins: Wundt and James\n## Rationalism versus empiricism","[{\"question\":\"What does the introduction say about psychology before it became a science?\",\"answer\":\"It treats psychology as a long tradition of speculative curiosity about mental states, but identifies the scientific history beginning in the nineteenth century.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the document discuss two “births” of scientific psychology?\",\"answer\":\"It explains that mid-century efforts in Germany and America reflect different approaches, often associated respectively with Wilhelm Wundt and William James.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the introduction contrast Wundt and James philosophically?\",\"answer\":\"It links Wundt to the rationalist tradition and James to the empiricist tradition, associating each with different views about knowledge and the mind.\"}]",1782218274,2020,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":27},"the-principles-of-psychology-vols-1-2",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-principles-of-psychology-vols-1-2/33928/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What does the introduction say about psychology before it became a science?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"It treats psychology as a long tradition of speculative curiosity about mental states, but identifies the scientific history beginning in the nineteenth century.","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"Why does the document discuss two “births” of scientific psychology?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"It explains that mid-century efforts in Germany and America reflect different approaches, often associated respectively with Wilhelm Wundt and William James.",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"How does the introduction contrast Wundt and James philosophically?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"It links Wundt to the rationalist tradition and James to the empiricist tradition, associating each with different views about knowledge and the mind.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]