[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-34031-en":3,"doc-seo-34031-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},34031,962075114765,"Quinn","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd",8,"Research & Report","The Mystery of Reproduction and the Limits of Automatism","The text develops a philosophical and quasi-scientific account of reproduction, contrasting superficial analogies with the deeper conditions that make continuity possible. It argues that attributing generational continuity to parental bodies is risky, since the mechanisms behind reproduction remain unknown. Using examples drawn from robotics, “absolute surface” field laws, and conceptual thought experiments like Flatland, it distinguishes mechanical copying and instructions from biological true reproduction, emphasizing division into two via an organic consciousness and treating heredity as a delayed gemmation.","","cbCaiklIEbwbzsVb","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiklIEbwbzsVb","pdf",808218,1,17,"English","en",105,"# Reproduction and Automatism\n## Ruyer’s critique of organic continuity\n## Man as a “tool kit” and the worker behind function\n## Reproduction among robots and the role of germ cells\n## Parents, twins, and fields in “absolute surface”\n## Gene/virus self-reproduction and quasi-distance\n## Reproduction-regeneration through field rupture\n## Mechanical copying vs true biological reproduction\n## Flatland and geometric limits of organisms","[{\"question\":\"Why does the text warn against “placing” organic continuity or “genidentity”?\",\"answer\":\"Because such placement mistakes the secondary forms and resulting mechanisms for the true underlying reality, similarly to confusing the machine or saw with the worker who uses it.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the text distinguish mechanical reproduction from biological reproduction?\",\"answer\":\"Mechanical reproduction is treated as moulding, copying, or information-instruction processing, which cannot represent biological facts; true reproduction is described as a bifurcation/division into two through an organic consciousness.\"},{\"question\":\"What concept is used to explain how a germ cell can reproduce like itself?\",\"answer\":\"The text claims germinal processes operate close to the microphysical order and follow laws of fields in “absolute surface,” where resemblance is “read” and copying can yield autonomous, numerically different parts.\"}]",1782228299,43,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":27},"the-mystery-of-reproduction-and-the-limits-of-automatism",{"@graph":34,"@context":84},[35,52,67],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-mystery-of-reproduction-and-the-limits-of-automatism/34031/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-02","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"Why does the text warn against “placing” organic continuity or “genidentity”?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"Because such placement mistakes the secondary forms and resulting mechanisms for the true underlying reality, similarly to confusing the machine or saw with the worker who uses it.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"How does the text distinguish mechanical reproduction from biological reproduction?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"Mechanical reproduction is treated as moulding, copying, or information-instruction processing, which cannot represent biological facts; true reproduction is described as a bifurcation/division into two through an organic consciousness.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"What concept is used to explain how a germ cell can reproduce like itself?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"The text claims germinal processes operate close to the microphysical order and follow laws of fields in “absolute surface,” where resemblance is “read” and copying can yield autonomous, numerically different parts.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":86,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]