[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-35809":3,"doc-seo-35809":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},35809,687197207057,"Sage","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0",8,"Research & Report","The Epistemic Condition of Moral Responsibility","Explores the epistemic condition required for moral responsibility, focusing on how knowledge or awareness relates to blame for wrongdoing. Uses the cases of Tamias to contrast two explanations of when ignorance excuses: the Blameless Ignorance Principle. Compares Reasonable Expectation accounts, tied to fairness and an agent’s capacity and opportunity to avoid moral error, with Quality of Will accounts, tied to the negative concern expressed in an agent’s attitudes. Lays out questions about the nature of ignorance and the scope of blame.","","cbCailMp4ASDqVMs","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailMp4ASDqVMs","pdf",316911,1,14,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n# When Does Ignorance Excuse?\n## Blameless Ignorance Principle\n## Reasonable Expectation\n## Quality of Will\n# Two Kinds of Ignorance","[{\"question\":\"What does the epistemic condition of moral responsibility concern?\",\"answer\":\"It concerns the knowledge or awareness required for an agent to be morally responsible, and how epistemic states like ignorance relate to blameworthiness.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the Blameless Ignorance Principle and its implications treat Tamias1 versus Tamias2?\",\"answer\":\"The principle states that blameless ignorance excuses wrongdoing from that ignorance. It implies Tamias1 is blameless and therefore not blameworthy, while Tamias2 is (given their blameworthy ignorance) not excused.\"},{\"question\":\"How do Reasonable Expectation (RE) and Quality of Will (QW) explain when ignorance excuses?\",\"answer\":\"RE ties excuse to fairness: it is unreasonable to expect avoidance when an agent lacks capacity or opportunity to recognize and respond to moral reasons. QW ties blame to the manifestation of negative quality of will; ignorance excuses when it prevents any negative will from expressing itself.\"}]",1782594537,35,null]