[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-661046-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-661046-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","the-double-helix-a-personal-account-of-the-discovery-of-the-structure-of-dna","THE DOUBLE HELIX - A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA","","An account of how James D. Watson describes the discovery of DNA’s double-helix structure, emphasizing the human pressures, uncertainty, and collaboration dilemmas behind major scientific breakthroughs. The foreword highlights the scientific impact, the resulting transformation of biochemistry, and the dramatic tension toward the final solution. The preface frames Watson’s narrative as lived impressions from 1951–1953, aiming to capture postwar England’s atmosphere rather than produce a fully definitive history.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/","Literature",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-double-helix-a-personal-account-of-the-discovery-of-the-structure-of-dna/661046/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/the-double-helix-a-personal-account-of-the-discovery-of-the-structure-of-dna/661046.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Riley West","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-28",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":26},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What is the purpose of the foreword in this book?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The foreword explains why the account of the DNA structure discovery is uniquely compelling, focusing on its scientific significance and the intense human drama behind the research.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How does the preface describe Watson’s approach to recounting events?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"Watson presents his version of how the structure of DNA was discovered, aiming to recreate the early postwar atmosphere and capture impressions from 1951–1953 rather than an objective assessment based on all later facts.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"Why does the author say a definitive history cannot be written from one perspective?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Watson notes that participants would tell the story differently because people perceive events in different ways, making an authoritative single history impossible.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},661046,1793156737,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,90,94,99,104,109,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":88,"slug":89},80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":95,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":100,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":26,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":26,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":79,"read_time":144},1099523885074,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","THE DOUBLE HELIX  \nA Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA  \nby James D. Watson  \nForeword by Sir Lawrence Bragg  \nTHIS ACCOUNT of the events which led to the solution of the structure of DNA, the fundamental genetical material, is unique in several ways. I was much pleased when Watson asked me to write the foreword.  \nThere is in the first place its scientific interest. The discovery of the structure by Crick and Watson, with all its biological implications, has been one of the major scientific events of this century. The number of researches which it has inspired is amazing; it has caused an explosion in biochemistry which has transformed the science. I have been amongst those who have pressed the author to write his recollections while they are still fresh in his mind, knowing how important they would be as a contribution to the history of science. The result has exceeded expectation. The latter chapters, in which the birth of the new idea is described so vividly, are drama of the highest order; the tension mounts and mounts towards the final climax. I do not know of any other instance where one is able to share so intimately in the researcher's struggles and doubts and final triumph.  \nThen again, the story is a poignant example of a dilemma which may confront an investigator. He knows that a colleague has been working for years on a problem and has accumulated a mass of hard-won evidence, which has not yet been published because it is anticipated that success is just around the comer. He has seen this evidence and has good reason to believe that a method of attack which he can envisage, perhaps merely a new point of view, will lead straight to the solution. An offer of collaboration at such a stage might well be regarded as a trespass. Should he go ahead on his own It is not easy to be sure whether the crucial new idea is really one's own or has been unconsciously assimilated in talks with others. The realization of this difficulty has led to the establishment of a some what vague code amongst scientists which recognizes a claim in a line of research staked out by a colleague up to a certain point. When competition comes from more than one quarter, there is no need to hold back. This dilemma comes out clearly in the DNA story. It is a source of deep satisfaction to all intimately concerned that, in the award of the Nobel Prize in 1962, due recognition was given to the long, patient investigation by Wilkins at King's College (London) as well as to the brilliant and rapid final solution by Crick and Watson at Cambridge.  \nFinally, there is the human interest of the story the impression made by Europe and by England in particular upon a young man from the States. He writes with a Pepys like frankness. Those who figure in the book must read it in a very forgiving spirit. One must remember that his book is not a history, but an autobiographical contribution to the history which will some day be written. As the author himself says, the book is a record of impressions rather than historical facts. The issues were often more complex, and the motives of those who had to deal with them were less tortuous, than he realized at the time. On the other hand, one must admit that his intuitive understanding of human frailty often strikes home.  \nThe author has shown the manuscript to some of us who were involved in the story, and we have suggested corrections of historical fact here and there, but personally  \nI have felt reluctant to alter too much because the fresh ness and directness with which impressions have been recorded is an essential part of the interest of this book.  \nW. L. B.  \nPreface  \nHERE I relate my version of how the structure of DNA was discovered. In doing so I have tried to catch the atmosphere of the early postwar years in England, where most of the important events occurred. As I hope this book will show, science seldom proceeds in the straightforward logical manner imagined by outsiders. Instea","cbCaiaZTb2a0qHKL","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaZTb2a0qHKL","pdf",653872,81,"English","# Foreword\n# Preface","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the foreword in this book?\",\"answer\":\"The foreword explains why the account of the DNA structure discovery is uniquely compelling, focusing on its scientific significance and the intense human drama behind the research.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the preface describe Watson’s approach to recounting events?\",\"answer\":\"Watson presents his version of how the structure of DNA was discovered, aiming to recreate the early postwar atmosphere and capture impressions from 1951–1953 rather than an objective assessment based on all later facts.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the author say a definitive history cannot be written from one perspective?\",\"answer\":\"Watson notes that participants would tell the story differently because people perceive events in different ways, making an authoritative single history impossible. \"}]","THE DOUBLE HELIX - A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA | PDF",125]