[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-513644-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-513644-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","the-dialogicality-of-dasein-conversation-and-encounter-within-heideggers-being-and-time","The Dialogicality of Dasein - Conversation and Encounter with/in Heidegger's Being and Time","","A thesis that unfolds the dialogical aspects of human subjectivity through the existential phenomenology of Heidegger’s Being and Time. The investigation is structured in three parts: an interpretation of subjectivity and the transition from inauthenticity to authenticity; an account of dialogue as conversation and encounter, grounded in alterity; and an application of this notion to interpret Dasein’s becoming authentic via radical alterity in anxious Being-towards-death.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/","Literature",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-dialogicality-of-dasein-conversation-and-encounter-within-heideggers-being-and-time/513644/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/the-dialogicality-of-dasein-conversation-and-encounter-within-heideggers-being-and-time/513644.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"anakgang17","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-21","2026-10-06",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What is the thesis’s main goal?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"To unfold the dialogical aspects of human subjectivity as expressed through Heidegger’s existential phenomenology in Being and Time.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How does the thesis distinguish the two figures of dialogue?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"Conversation is an exchange with thematic unity based on question and response, while encounter is an event of meeting that heightens the other’s alterity and challenges both self and meaning.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How is dialogue used to explain Dasein becoming authentic?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Dasein’s everydayness is interpreted as third-person conversationality, transformed into first-person conversationality through an encounter with radical alterity in anxious Being-towards-death.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},513644,1791841741,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,90,94,99,104,109,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":88,"slug":89},80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":91,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":95,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":100,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":26,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090883568,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","The Dialogicality of Dasein:Conversation and Encounter with/in Heidegger's Being and Time  \nLeslie A.MacAvoyDepartment of PhilosophyMcGill University,Montré al  \nJuly 1997  \nA thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Researchin partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree ofDoctor of Philosophy  \nLeslie MacAvoy,1997  \nThe author has granted a non-exclusive licence allowing theNational Library of Canada toreproduce,loan,distribute or sellcopies of this thesis in microform,paper or electronic formats.  \nThe author retains ownership of thecopyright in this thesis.Neither thethesis nor substantial extracts from itmay be printed or otherwisereproduced without the author'spermission.  \nAcquisitions andBibliographic Services  \n395 Wellington Street  \nOttawa ON K1A ON4  \nCanada  \nCanada  \nBibliotheque nationaledu Canada  \nAcquisitions etservices bibliographiques  \n395,rue Wellington  \nOttawa ON K1A ON4  \nCanada  \n0-612-44502-X  \nYour file Votre relerence  \nOur file Notre relerence  \nL'auteur a accordé une licence nonexclusive permettant a la  \nBibliotheque nationale du Canada dereproduire,preter,distribuer ouvendre des copies de cette these sousla forme de microfiche/film,dereproduction sur papier ou sur formatélectronique.  \nL'auteur conserve la proprieté dudroit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse.Nila thèse ni des extraits substantielsde celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimésou autrement reproduits sans sonautorisation.  \n# ABSTRACT\n\nThe project is to unfold the dialogical aspects of human subjectivity as expressedthrough the existential phenomenology of Heidegger's Being and Time.Theinvestigation is divided into three parts.  \nPart I offers an interpretation of Heidegger's concept of subjectivity withemphasis on the movement from inauthenticity to authenticity.In order to mediate themore traditionally existentialist reading of Dasein's authenticity,I situate Being and Timewithin Heidegger's larger phenomenological project.This opens up the possibility ofthinking about Being-in-the-world and Being-towards-death in terms of a livedintentionality in which Dasein has its own Being as its object.Although Dasein in itseverydayness generally only comports toward its own Being in the manner characteristicof empty intentionality,this intention can be fulfilled.This fulfillment constitutesDasein's authenticity.  \nPart II poses the question:What is dialogue?I illustrate that there are two figuresof dialogue—conversation and encounter.Conversation is an exchange betweenparticipants which maintains a particular flow and thematic unity,and is based on thestructure of question and response.Its possibility rests in the otherness of the participantswith respect to one another and in their ability to mediate this difference through someshared basis of meaning.Encounter,on the other hand,is an event of meeting betweenparticipants in which the alterity of the other is thrown into high relief by the challengewhich it poses to the self,thereby throwing into question both the self and the meaning inwhich it dwells.Nevertheless,both conversation and encounter can be shown to bedialogical relative to a constellation of concepts.Dialogue is an engagement with alteritymarked by a simultaneous continuity and discontinuity with the other.This engagementbears a relation to meaning and is the ground of responsibility and questionability.  \nIn Part Ⅲ,this notion of dialogue is used to interpret Dasein's subjectivity and itsbecoming authentic.I argue that Dasein's everydayness can be understood as aconversationality in the third person which is transformed into the first-personconversationality of authentic historizing through an encounter with radical alterity inanxious Being-towards-death.  \nRESUMÉ  \nCe projet a comme but I'exploration des aspects dialogiques de la subjectivitéselon la phenomenologie existentielle de Heidegger dans L'etre et le temps.  \nLa premiere partie offre une interpretation du concept de la subjectivité chezHeidegger et me","cbCaiapsAukvN6J3","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiapsAukvN6J3","pdf",26743673,332,"English","# ABSTRACT\n## Dialogical aspects of subjectivity\n## Two figures of dialogue: conversation and encounter\n## Applying dialogue to Dasein’s authenticity","[{\"question\":\"What is the thesis’s main goal?\",\"answer\":\"To unfold the dialogical aspects of human subjectivity as expressed through Heidegger’s existential phenomenology in Being and Time.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the thesis distinguish the two figures of dialogue?\",\"answer\":\"Conversation is an exchange with thematic unity based on question and response, while encounter is an event of meeting that heightens the other’s alterity and challenges both self and meaning.\"},{\"question\":\"How is dialogue used to explain Dasein becoming authentic?\",\"answer\":\"Dasein’s everydayness is interpreted as third-person conversationality, transformed into first-person conversationality through an encounter with radical alterity in anxious Being-towards-death.\"}]","The Dialogicality of Dasein - Conversation and Encounter with/in Heidegger's Being and Time | PDF",1791288328,511]