[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-501039-105":59,"doc-detail-501039-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","the-development-and-revision-of-fsc-normative-documents-reviewed-document-full-revision","The Development and Revision of FSC® Normative Documents - Reviewed Document - Full revision","","PSU Review Report sets out a clear methodology for developing, reviewing, and revising FSC® normative documents within the FSC Normative Framework, ensuring stability and predictability across the system. It records the document’s status as approved, the review timeline, and the objective for evaluating continued relevance and effectiveness. PSU recommends a full revision, citing inefficiencies, limited flexibility, complex governance structures, insufficient monitoring and impact assessment guidance, and ineffective engagement and public consultation outcomes.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-development-and-revision-of-fsc-normative-documents-reviewed-document-full-revision/501039/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/the-development-and-revision-of-fsc-normative-documents-reviewed-document-full-revision/501039.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Taylor Morgan","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the objective of the procedure described in the review report?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It provides a clear methodology to develop, review, and revise all normative documents in the FSC Normative Framework to promote stability and predictability within the FSC system.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"When was the last approval date and what public consultation period was used?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The last approval date is 25 March 2015, with public consultation from 18 July to 05 September (draft review report dated 17 July 2019, final review report dated 06 September).",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Why does PSU recommend a full revision?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"PSU identifies inefficiencies in the current process, complex and hierarchical roles and decision structures, insufficient flexibility and user-friendliness, lack of chapters on monitoring and impact assessment, and ineffective engagement and public consultations.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},501039,1791296270,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},1099523885336,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","PSU Review Report  \nof  \nFSC-PRO-01-001 V3-1 The Development and Revision of FSC® Normative Documents  \n\n| Status: Approved\u003Cbr>Contact for comments: FSC International Center\u003Cbr>-Performance and Standards UnitAdenauerallee 134\u003Cbr>53113 Bonn, Germany\u003Cbr> +49- (0)228-36766-0\u003Cbr> +49- (0)228-36766-30  [psu@fsc.org](psu@fsc.org) |\n| --- |\n| All Rights Reserved FSC® International 2019 FSC® F000100\u003Cbr>No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher.\u003Cbr>Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website ( [ic.fsc.org](ic.fsc.org)) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. |\n\nPSU Review Report  \nThe Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non-government organization established to promote environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests.  \nFSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations.  \nReviewed Document  \n\n| Document code | FSC-PRO-01-001 V3-1 |\n| --- | --- |\n| Document title | The Development and Revision of FSC® Normative Documents |\n| Objective of document | The objective of this Procedure is to provide a clear and unambiguous methodology to develop, review, and revise all normative documents in the FSC Normative Framework in order to promote stability and predictability within the FSC system. |\n| Last approval date | 25 March 2015 |\n| Review triggered by | ☒ Regular review as scheduled |\n|  | ☐ GA Motion or Board decision |\n|  | ☐ New or changed FSC policies or legislation |\n|  | ☐ Change Requests |\n|  | ☒ OtheFSCrG(lpoleabalseStsrpaetecgifyic)P: lan 2015-2020 |\n| Reviewer | Name: Dorothee Jung-Wilhelm |\n|  | e-mail:  d.jung-wi[lhelm@fsc.org](lhelm@fsc.org) |\n| Draft Review Report | 17 July 2019 |\n| Public consultation | 18 July – 05 September |\n| Final Review Report | 06 September |\n\nRecommendation  \n\n| ☒ | Full revision |\n| --- | --- |\n| ☐ | Minor revision 1 |\n| ☐ | Editorial revision |\n| ☐ | No revision |\n| ☐ | Withdrawal |\n\n1 According to FSC-PRO-01-001 V3-1 Annex 4  \nNote  \nIf the need for revision is concluded in and supported by stakeholders, the report will be presented to the FSC Board of Directors for decision making. If approved by the FSC Board, the reviewed document will then undergo a revision process as described in procedure FSC-PRO-01-001 V3-1 .  \nThis report has been developed according to FSC-PRO-01-001 V3-1 Clause 9.6 to review (assess) the continued relevance and effectiveness of a normative document. This is a mandatory step before a normative document can be taken to a revision process. In addition, it responds to the Board requirement for a feasibility and impact for all review and revision processes, mandated at their 71st Meeting.  \nII. Proposed recommendation and justification   \nPSU recommends a full revision of FSCs’main standard-setting procedure FSC-PRO- 01-001 The Development and Revision ofFSC Normative Documents. This document specifies how documents of the FSC Normative Framework are developed, reviewed and revised. The last full revision was completed in 2013, a minor revision took place in 2015. The revision will incorporate recommendations of the governance review process and potential changes to the ISEAL Code of Good Practice for Setting Social and Environmental Standards.  \nFSC-PRO-01-001 V3-1 is the main vehicle to incorporate streamlining principles into the FSC Normative Framework (i.e. , Strategy 1 of the Global Strategic Plan 2015- 2020) , aiming at simplifying the procedure, accelerating development and revision processes, completing gaps, as well as making it more effect","cbCais6lkxlGy5GR","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCais6lkxlGy5GR","pdf",378286,"English","# Reviewed Document\n## Document Information\n## Recommendation\n## Proposed Recommendation and Justification\n## Identified Issues","[{\"question\":\"What is the objective of the procedure described in the review report?\",\"answer\":\"It provides a clear methodology to develop, review, and revise all normative documents in the FSC Normative Framework to promote stability and predictability within the FSC system.\"},{\"question\":\"When was the last approval date and what public consultation period was used?\",\"answer\":\"The last approval date is 25 March 2015, with public consultation from 18 July to 05 September (draft review report dated 17 July 2019, final review report dated 06 September).\"},{\"question\":\"Why does PSU recommend a full revision?\",\"answer\":\"PSU identifies inefficiencies in the current process, complex and hierarchical roles and decision structures, insufficient flexibility and user-friendliness, lack of chapters on monitoring and impact assessment, and ineffective engagement and public consultations.\"}]","The Development and Revision of FSC® Normative Documents - Reviewed Document - Full revision | PDF",1791016877,18]