[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33365":3,"doc-seo-33365":28},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"table_of_contents":24,"faqs":25,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":26,"read_time":27},33365,2336464648322,"Aria","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/2200025388227c56fec?_k=1778556882303663488",2,"Literature","The Death of Philosophy","The Death of Philosophy examines how contemporary thought addresses the idea of philosophy’s “death” through reference and self-reference. The work traces debates around post-philosophy, naturalism, skepticism, positivism, and linguistic paradigms, then turns to reflexive a priori frameworks. By developing models of self-reference and reflexive identity, it analyzes the philosophical status of discourse, the law governing self-reference, and the consistency, fecundity, and applicability of transcendental arguments.","cbCaiv0BwOyt3Iwz","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiv0BwOyt3Iwz","pdf",1569801,3,1,358,"English","en","# Introduction\n# Part I. The End of Philosophy, or the Paradoxes of Speaking\n## Skeptical and Scientific “Post-philosophy”\n## “Saying and the Said”: Two Paradigms for the Same Subject\n## The Antispeculative View: Habermas as an Example\n## Kant’s Shadow in the Current Philosophical Landscape\n# Part II. Challenging the “Death of Philosophy”: The Reflexive A Priori\n## A Definition of the Model\n## The Model of Self-reference’s Consistency\n## The Model’s Fecundity","[{\"question\":\"What central theme connects the book’s sections?\",\"answer\":\"The book links contemporary discussions of philosophy’s “death” to the roles of reference and self-reference, including how philosophical discourse can be reflexive and self-governing.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the book treat the idea of “post-philosophy”?\",\"answer\":\"It analyzes skeptical and scientific post-philosophy positions, including the tension between scientism and skepticism and the dissolution of philosophy in positive science.\"},{\"question\":\"What is the “reflexive a priori” used for in the book?\",\"answer\":\"It provides a framework for building models of self-reference and reflexive identity, addressing the philosophical status of discourse, the consistency of self-referential approaches, and the constructive power of transcendental arguments.\"}]",1782207788,551,{"code":4,"msg":29,"data":30},"ok",{"site_id":31,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":33,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":26},105,"the-death-of-philosophy","",{"@graph":35,"@context":83},[36,51,66],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,46,48],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-death-of-philosophy/33365/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":40,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-24","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What central theme connects the book’s sections?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"The book links contemporary discussions of philosophy’s “death” to the roles of reference and self-reference, including how philosophical discourse can be reflexive and self-governing.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How does the book treat the idea of “post-philosophy”?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"It analyzes skeptical and scientific post-philosophy positions, including the tension between scientism and skepticism and the dissolution of philosophy in positive science.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What is the “reflexive a priori” used for in the book?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"It provides a framework for building models of self-reference and reflexive identity, addressing the philosophical status of discourse, the consistency of self-referential approaches, and the constructive power of transcendental arguments.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":31}]