[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33730-en":3,"doc-seo-33730-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33730,13056703019404,"Miles","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0",2,"Literature","The Crooked Path from Vagueness to Four-Dimensionalism","Ordinary objects raise a persistence problem: four-dimensionalism (“temporal parts”) and three-dimensionalism (“wholly present” endurance) offer contrasting accounts of how houses, trees, people, and other entities persist across time. The paper evaluates Theodore Sider’s defense of four-dimensionalism via stage-theory, arguing that its case depends centrally on the “argument from vagueness.” The author defends a thesis that this argument has a fatal flaw, undermining Sider’s overall conclusions and their meta-philosophical implications.","","cbCaifaqo7YinX6r","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifaqo7YinX6r","pdf",146754,1,29,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n# The dialectical landscape: a brief sketch\n# The argument from vagueness\n# Evaluation and overall conclusion","[{\"question\":\"What difference does four-dimensionalism make compared with three-dimensionalism about object persistence?\",\"answer\":\"Four-dimensionalism says ordinary objects persist by having temporal parts at all times they exist, while three-dimensionalism says they persist by being “wholly present” at each time of existence without an additional temporal dimension.\"},{\"question\":\"How does Sider’s stage-theory explain persisting objects?\",\"answer\":\"Sider analyzes persisting objects as identical to momentary stages, with persistence secured by having temporal counterparts at other times, contrasting with the worm-theory approach.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the paper focus on the “argument from vagueness”?\",\"answer\":\"The author argues that Sider’s dialectical case ultimately turns on the argument from vagueness, and claims it has an arguably fatal flaw that cannot carry the required burden, affecting the success of Sider’s whole position.\"}]",1782214869,45,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":27},"the-crooked-path-from-vagueness-to-four-dimensionalism",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,51,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-crooked-path-from-vagueness-to-four-dimensionalism/33730/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-02","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What difference does four-dimensionalism make compared with three-dimensionalism about object persistence?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"Four-dimensionalism says ordinary objects persist by having temporal parts at all times they exist, while three-dimensionalism says they persist by being “wholly present” at each time of existence without an additional temporal dimension.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How does Sider’s stage-theory explain persisting objects?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Sider analyzes persisting objects as identical to momentary stages, with persistence secured by having temporal counterparts at other times, contrasting with the worm-theory approach.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"Why does the paper focus on the “argument from vagueness”?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The author argues that Sider’s dialectical case ultimately turns on the argument from vagueness, and claims it has an arguably fatal flaw that cannot carry the required burden, affecting the success of Sider’s whole position.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]