[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-324613-105":59,"doc-detail-324613-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","the-costs-of-default-and-international-lending","The Costs of Default and International Lending","","August 1982之后，多国出现外债偿付困难并引发1982年发展中国家债务危机。文中对“违约”在不同形式下的差异进行界定：包括彻底拒偿、协商性违约与合作性中断，并分析这些偿付失败如何影响债权人与债务国双方的资金安全与信用状况。文章进一步讨论借款国在“及时偿付—修改条款—极端违约”连续选项之间如何进行成本收益权衡，以及国际私人借贷结构可能暴露出的制度性弱点。",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-costs-of-default-and-international-lending/324613/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/the-costs-of-default-and-international-lending/324613.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Violet","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"文中如何区分不同形式的债务偿付失败（default）？","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"文中将彻底拒偿视为最极端、较少发生的非合作违约；协商性违约与合作性中断则包含双方“同意或至少接受修改原借款协议条款”的要素。","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"为什么国际债权人在不偿付时更难获得追偿？",{"text":118,"@type":114},"文章指出，国际信用协议中，债权人用于不付款的最终防御手段（如扣押抵押品、诉诸法律程序）并不能在国际环境中充分适用，因此主权债务人的偿付并非严格可执行。",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"借款国在债务偿付困难时如何选择应对策略？",{"text":122,"@type":114},"文章认为，借款国通常会在一系列选择构成的连续选项中比较成本与收益，例如从及时偿付到极端违约，或选择改变偿付条款以应对外汇与国内经济需求等问题。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},324613,1790561845,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},4398048950312,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002538284de19e3c?_k=1778320343897328908","# The Costs of Default andInternational Lending\n\nby Chien Nan Wang  \nIn August 1982,Mexico announcedthat it was unable to service its nearly$80 billion foreign debt.Brazil,Argen-tina.Venezuela and other debtorcountries soon announced their owndebt-servicing difficulties.  \nInitially,it was feared that these bor-rowers might flatly refuse to repaytheir debts,thus repudiating their loanobligationsBecause debt repudiationcould severely hurt both creditors anddebtors,the threat became the focus ofwhat became known as the 1982 less-developed-country(LDC)debt crisis.  \nBetween 1983 and 1986,creditors,debtors,and the International MonetaryFund(IMF)generally were able towork together to manage the debtproblems,keeping interest paymentson schedule by restructuring old loansand by making new loans in what canbe described as a process of \"coopera-tive interruptions.\"  \nHowever,in 1986,Peru limited debt-service payments to not more than 10percent of its export revenues.Morestrikingly,in February 1987,despite anongoing effort to reschedule andrefinanceits debt,Brazil unilaterallydelayed interest payments.In additionto Brazil,seven other Latin Americancountries,together with several smallerAfrican countries,delayed interest pay-ments in 1987.However,as will be dis-cussed later,most of these interruptedpayments were renegotiated,with inter-  \nest payments resuming within a year,through a set of arrangements that hasbeen described as a \"conciliatorydefault.\"²Earlier this year,Brazil againannounced several measures designedto delay the repayment of its debts.  \nConciliatory default,cooperative inter-ruptions,and outright debt repudiationcan each be regarded as a type of debtservicing failure—that is,of aborrower's failure to service and repayits debt as originally specified in theloan agreement.There are important dis-tinctions among the types of debt-service failure.Outright repudiation isthe most extreme form of noncoopera-tive default,and occurs rarely.In con-trast,both conciliatory default and coop-erative interruption are characterized byimportant elements of mutual agree-ment,or at least acceptance of the needto modify the original loan agreement.Of these two,the latter procedure is themost amicable.However one describesthe process,the intermational debt-service difficulties of recent years raisequestions that are worth exploring.  \nFirst,any type of debt servicing failurecan hurt creditors and debtors alike.Creditors see their capital eroded,threatening their solvency;debtorsdamage their own creditworthiness,perhaps impairing their ability to bor-row again.Given such significantcosts,how do borrowers choose the ap-propriate response to their debt servic-ing problems?  \nMarch 1,1989  \nDuring the past few years,a numberof less developed countries(LDCs)have had difficulty repaying theirforeign debt.Sometimes paymentshave been suspended or delayed—making it necessary for debtors andcreditors to renegotiate or resched-ule loan payments.These problemshave raised questions about the costsand benefits of different types ofdebt repayment negotiations andtheir implications for the future of in-ternational lending.This article in-vestigates these questions.  \nSecond,intemational lending to LDCscurrently is declining.Declining capitalinflows make it even more difficult forLDCs to service their debts and tofinance their growth.Considering thehuge amount of old debt and the uncer-tain prospects for future repayment,it isdifficult to restore lenders'incentives tomake new loans.Even if overall indebt-edness were reduced to a more manage-able level,for example,how couldlenders really be confident that debtorswould not default again in the future?Finally,do widespread problems withintemational debt service reveal a fun-damental weakness in the structure ofinternational private lending that doesnot exist in purely domestic lending?  \nThe key to answering these questionscenters on the benefits and costs ofdefault in its various forms.ThisEconomic Commentar","cbCairPHTHz75sna","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairPHTHz75sna","pdf",1164014,"English","# The 1982 LDC debt crisis\n## Cooperative interruptions and conciliatory default\n## Debt servicing failure: definitions and distinctions\n## Costs and incentives for borrowers\n# The benefits and costs of default\n## Why repayment is hard to enforce internationally\n## Benefits of altering repayment terms\n## Political and economic considerations","[{\"question\":\"文中如何区分不同形式的债务偿付失败（default）？\",\"answer\":\"文中将彻底拒偿视为最极端、较少发生的非合作违约；协商性违约与合作性中断则包含双方“同意或至少接受修改原借款协议条款”的要素。\"},{\"question\":\"为什么国际债权人在不偿付时更难获得追偿？\",\"answer\":\"文章指出，国际信用协议中，债权人用于不付款的最终防御手段（如扣押抵押品、诉诸法律程序）并不能在国际环境中充分适用，因此主权债务人的偿付并非严格可执行。\"},{\"question\":\"借款国在债务偿付困难时如何选择应对策略？\",\"answer\":\"文章认为，借款国通常会在一系列选择构成的连续选项中比较成本与收益，例如从及时偿付到极端违约，或选择改变偿付条款以应对外汇与国内经济需求等问题。\"}]","The Costs of Default and International Lending | PDF",1789968403,13]