[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-664655-105":59,"doc-detail-664655-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","the-20th-century-architecture-of-frank-lloyd-wright-revised-nomination-to-the-world-heritage-list-2016","The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright - Revised Nomination to the World Heritage List - 2016","","Revised nomination dossier for inscribing The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright on the World Heritage List, issued as an update to a 2016 referral decision. The foreword explains the collaborative process among the Frank Lloyd Wright World Heritage Council, the United States National Park Service, and ICOMOS, incorporating committee comments and guidance. It outlines how revised sections are identified (green triangles and green highlighting), summarizes key series composition changes, and details revisions to criteria justification, boundaries, protection, and management, with supporting references and updated monitoring indicators.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/the-20th-century-architecture-of-frank-lloyd-wright-revised-nomination-to-the-world-heritage-list-2016/664655/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/the-20th-century-architecture-of-frank-lloyd-wright-revised-nomination-to-the-world-heritage-list-2016/664655.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"SundayMiles","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of the revised dossier?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It serves as a nomination for inscription of The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright on the World Heritage List, incorporating changes after the 2016 referral decision.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the dossier indicate which parts were revised?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Revised parts are marked with green triangles in affected pages, and changed text is highlighted in green.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What major changes were made to the proposed series justification and components?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The series was reduced to eight components after Price Tower and the Marin County Civic Center were removed, and only criterion (ii) is proposed as justification, with additional possible future extension buildings identified.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},664655,1793266053,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144},1099529839202,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","The 20 Th-cenTury ArchiTecTure of frAnk LLoyd WrighT  \nNomination to the World Heritage List by the United States of America (2016) Revised 2019  \nFOREWORD  \nThe Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy is honored to present this revised document, The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright , as a nomination for inscription to the World Heritage List. As the only organization with the mission to facilitate the preservation and maintenance of the remaining structures designed by Frank Lloyd Wright, this nomination is one of the most important shared endeavors we have undertaken.  \nAfter the World Heritage Committee’s referral decision in July 2016, the Frank Lloyd Wright World Heritage Council worked closely with the United States National Park Service and, through them, with ICOMOS, to seriously consider their comments and use them to make appropriate changes to the proposal.  \nThis dossier represents a strong collaboration between the eight Wright component sites and a group of established Wright scholars, including the Conservancy’s current and former Board members David DeLong, Neil Levine, Richard Longstreth, and Jack Quinan. We thank representatives from each site who contributed their time and knowledge to this project. We are enormously grateful to Lynda Waggoner and Scott Perkins (both of Fallingwater), Jeffrey Herr (Hollyhock House), and Stuart Graff (Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation) for their contributions to writing the revised sections, and to the invaluable guidance of Phyllis Ellin and Stephen Morris of the Office of International Affairs at the National Park Service.  \nPresident  \nBarbara Gordon Executive Director  \n53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1120 | Chicago, [IL 60604 | T 312.663.5500 | preservation@savewright.org](IL 60604 | T 312.663.5500 | preservation@savewright.org)  \n\n| INTRODUCTION\u003Cbr>Changes made in response to the World Heritage Committee’s 2016 Referral Decision and after Consultation with ICOMOS\u003Cbr>How to Identify the Revised Parts of the Dossier\u003Cbr>The revised parts of the dossier are indicated by green triangles in the lower right-or left-hand corner of the affected pages. The changed text (either the whole page, paragraph, or individual sentences) is highlighted in green. Other parts of the dossier have been edited to streamline the text and update, clarify, and correct minor errors and inconsistencies. |  |\n| --- | --- |\n| Composition and justification of the series\u003Cbr>n Two of the components of the original series, Price Tower and the Marin County Civic Center, are no longer included, leaving eight components.\u003Cbr>n Only criterion (ii) is now proposed as justification [criterion (i) was dropped at the suggestion of ICOMOS].\u003Cbr>n Six additional buildings have been identified as possible future extensions to the series. These would include an example of a textile blockhouse, two additional Usonian houses, an additional example of a Prairie house, a house in Japan, and the unique S.C. Johnson Administration Building and Research Tower.\u003Cbr>n A new historical context has been provided in Section 2.b.\u003Cbr>n Section 3 has been revised to reflect these changes.\u003Cbr>n The bibliography in Section 7 has been supplemented.\u003Cbr>Boundaries\u003Cbr>n The proposed boundaries of Taliesin West and Hollyhock House have been expanded. | n The proposed buffer zones of the Herbert and Katherine Jacobs House and Hollyhock House have been enlarged.\u003Cbr>n Minor changes have been made to the buffer zones of Fallingwater and Taliesin.\u003Cbr>n These boundary changes are explained in the Executive Summary and Section 2.a.\u003Cbr>Protection and Management\u003Cbr>n Additional information on the legal protections for the buffer zones has been provided in Section 5.c.\u003Cbr>n New synthetic summaries of the management systems for the individual components and the overall management of the series has been provided in Section 5.c., for greater clarity and to address questions raised by ICOMOS.\u003Cbr>n The monitoring indicators have been updated to refle","cbCaiscexJzLU2r8","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiscexJzLU2r8","pdf",49676559,382,"English","# Introduction\n## Changes made in response to the World Heritage Committee’s 2016 Referral Decision and after Consultation with ICOMOS\n## How to Identify the Revised Parts of the Dossier\n## Composition and justification of the series\n## Boundaries\n## Protection and Management\n# Table of Contents\n## Executive Summary\n## Section 1. Identification of the Property\n## 1. a State Party\n## 1. b State\n## 1. c Name of the Property\n## 1. d Geographical Coordinates to the Nearest Second","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the revised dossier?\",\"answer\":\"It serves as a nomination for inscription of The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright on the World Heritage List, incorporating changes after the 2016 referral decision.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the dossier indicate which parts were revised?\",\"answer\":\"Revised parts are marked with green triangles in affected pages, and changed text is highlighted in green.\"},{\"question\":\"What major changes were made to the proposed series justification and components?\",\"answer\":\"The series was reduced to eight components after Price Tower and the Marin County Civic Center were removed, and only criterion (ii) is proposed as justification, with additional possible future extension buildings identified.\"}]","The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright - Revised Nomination to the World Heritage List - 2016 | PDF",963]