[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-292974-105":59,"doc-detail-292974-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","tech-brief-for-the-mbti-form-m-and-form-q-assessments-singapore","Tech Brief for the MBTI® Form M and Form Q Assessments - Singapore","","Technical brief examining measurement properties of the MBTI Form M and Form Q assessments using a Singaporean sample. It reviews reliability of the four preference pairs via internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas), details MBTI type distribution among 12,838 participants, and reports preference distributions. Results are compared with the US national representative sample from the MBTI Manual to evaluate similarities and differences in psychometric patterns.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/tech-brief-for-the-mbti-form-m-and-form-q-assessments-singapore/292974/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/tech-brief-for-the-mbti-form-m-and-form-q-assessments-singapore/292974.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jake","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-06","2026-09-17",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does the technical brief evaluate about MBTI Form M and Form Q in Singapore?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It summarizes measurement properties by examining the reliability of the MBTI Form M and Form Q assessments, reporting type distribution for a Singaporean sample, and comparing results with the US national representative sample.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How are MBTI personality types determined in the assessment described?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The assessment uses four preference pairs (E/I, S/N, T/F, J/P). One letter from each pair yields one of 16 possible personality types such as ESTJ or INFP.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What reliability approach is used for the Singaporean sample and how is it reported?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Internal consistency reliabilities are reported using Cronbach’s alphas for the four preference pairs. Table 5 presents these values for both the Singaporean sample and the US NRS.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},292974,1789658174,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":39,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":46,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Technical Brief for the  \nMBTI ® FORM M and FORM Q ASSESSMENTS  \nSingapore  \nNancy A. Schaubhut Richard C. Thompson  \n[800-624-1765 | www.cpp.com](800-624-1765 | www.cpp.com)  \nTechnical Brief for the MBTI® Form M and Form Q Assessments—Singapore Copyright 2017 by CPP, Inc. All rights reserved. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Myers-Briggs, MBTI, Step I, Step II, and the MBTI logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of The Myers & Briggs Foundation in the United States and other  \ncountries. The CPP logo is a trademark or registered trademark of CPP, Inc., in the United States and other countries.  \nINTRODUCTION  \nThe Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®) instrument is one of the most commonly used personality assessments in the world. Because its administration outside the United States is growing rapidly, the instrument is continually being evaluated for use in specific regions. This technical brief summarizes the measurement properties of the MBTI Form M and Form Q assessments with a Singaporean sample. To that end, it examines the reliability of the MBTI Form M and Form Q assessments, reports on type distribution in a sample of Singaporean participants, and provides comparisons with the US national representative sample (NRS) used in the MBTI® Manual (Myers, McCaulley, Quenk, & Hammer, 1998) to examine similarities and differences between the groups.  \nTHE MBTI® ASSESSMENT  \nThe MBTI assessment uses a typology composed of four pairs of opposite preferences, called preference pairs:  \n• Extraversion (E) or Introversion (I)—how you direct and receive energy  \n• Sensing (S) or Intuition (N)—how you take in information  \n• Thinking (T) or Feeling (F)—how you decide and come to conclusions  \n• Judging (J) or Perceiving (P)—how you approach the outside world  \nThe assessment combines an individual’s four preferences—one from each preference pair, denoted by its letter—to yield one of the 16 possible personality types (e.g. , ESTJ, INFP, etc.) . Each type is equally valuable, and an individual inherently belongs to one of the 16 types. This model differentiates the MBTI assessment from most other personality instruments, which typically assess personality traits. Trait-based instruments measure how much of a certain characteristic an individual possesses. Unlike the MBTI assessment, those instruments usually consider one end of a trait to be more positive and the other to be more negative.  \nSINGAPOREAN SAMPLE  \nHistorically, the MBTI assessment has been administered in Singapore using North American English. A sample composed of 12,838 Singaporean respondents who completed the MBTI Form Q assessment in North American English was obtained for this study. It is important to note that this is not a representative sample, but rather a sample of convenience. Therefore, no inferences may be drawn about the preferences or type distribution of the population of Singapore. The data reported in this technical brief should be used for psychometric information purposes only.  \nThe Singaporean sample includes 54% women and 44% men, 1% not reported. Respondents’ ages ranged from 18 to 69 years (mean = 36.4, SD = 8.7) . All respondents reported their country of residence as Singapore. Additional demographics were not available for this sample.  \nTable 1 includes the number and percentage of respondents of each type in the sample. As shown, the most frequently occurring type for this sample is ISTJ (22.8%), followed by ESTJ (12.3%) . The least common types are ESFP (2.5%) and ENFJ (3.0%) . Type distributions for women and men in the Singaporean sample are presented in Tables 2 and 3.  \nTable 4 shows the number and percentage of respondents for each preference. Also included for reference are the number and percentage of respondents for each preference in the US national representative sample (NRS; Myers et al. , 1998) .  \nRELIABILITY OF THE FORM MPREFERENCES  \nThe internal consistency reliabilities (Cronbach’s alphas) for the Singaporean sample ","cbCaijJHvRgiBlXu","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijJHvRgiBlXu","pdf",140926,"English","# Introduction\n# The MBTI® Assessment\n# Singaporean Sample\n# Reliability of the MBTI® Form M Preferences\n# Tables","[{\"question\":\"What does the technical brief evaluate about MBTI Form M and Form Q in Singapore?\",\"answer\":\"It summarizes measurement properties by examining the reliability of the MBTI Form M and Form Q assessments, reporting type distribution for a Singaporean sample, and comparing results with the US national representative sample.\"},{\"question\":\"How are MBTI personality types determined in the assessment described?\",\"answer\":\"The assessment uses four preference pairs (E/I, S/N, T/F, J/P). One letter from each pair yields one of 16 possible personality types such as ESTJ or INFP.\"},{\"question\":\"What reliability approach is used for the Singaporean sample and how is it reported?\",\"answer\":\"Internal consistency reliabilities are reported using Cronbach’s alphas for the four preference pairs. Table 5 presents these values for both the Singaporean sample and the US NRS.\"}]","Tech Brief for the MBTI® Form M and Form Q Assessments - Singapore | PDF"]