[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-657492-105":59,"doc-detail-657492-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","taylor-diagrams-and-soil-profiles-supplement-figures-s1-s17","Taylor diagrams and soil profiles (Supplement Figures S1-S17)","","Supplementary figures S1–S5 present Taylor diagrams that benchmark modeled net radiation, friction velocity, sensible heat flux, and latent heat flux against FLUXNET observations at US-UMB, DE-HAI, US-Me2, US-MMS, and AU-Tum for all experiments. Red star marks observations, and proximity indicates improved skill via higher correlation, more realistic variability, and lower centered RMSE, with scores tabulated in Table 3. Supplement sections S2–S4 further show diurnal cycles and time series comparisons for net radiation, fluxes, soil liquid water (volumetric moisture), and soil temperature across the same stations, using nearest model grid midpoints to matched observational depths.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/taylor-diagrams-and-soil-profiles-supplement-figures-s1-s17/657492/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/taylor-diagrams-and-soil-profiles-supplement-figures-s1-s17/657492.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"FajarTechTalk","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-26",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What do the Taylor diagrams (S1) compare, and what does closeness to the red star indicate?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"They compare modeled net radiation, friction velocity, sensible heat flux, and latent heat flux against observations at multiple FLUXNET sites. Results plotted closer to the red star indicate better performance, reflecting higher correlation, more realistic variability, and lower centered RMSE.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which figure section provides averaged diurnal profiles, and for which station are they shown?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Section S2 describes diurnal profiles. Figure 8 gives the averaged profiles for the US-UMB FLUXNET station, and Figures S6–S9 provide similar plots for DE-HAI, US-Me2, US-MMS, and AU-Tum.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How are modeled soil moisture and soil temperature aligned with observations in S3 and S4?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"For soil moisture (S3) and soil temperature (S4), the modeled values at grid midpoints are matched to the nearest observational depths shown in Figures 9 and 10. The soil liquid water content is treated as volumetric soil moisture because there is no soil ice.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},657492,1792981016,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":36},962094249465,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","S1. Taylor diagrams  \nFigures S1 to S5 show Taylor diagrams comparing modeled net radiation, friction velocity, sensible heat flux, and latent heat flux against observations at the US-UMB, DE-HAI, US-Me2, US-MMS, and AU-Tum FLUXNET sites for all experiments. In these diagrams, the red star denotes the observations; model results plotted closer to this reference point indicate better performance, reflecting higher correlation, more realistic variability, and lower centered RMSE. The Taylor scores for all the experiments and FLUXNET stations are quantified in Table 3 in the main text.  \nFigure S1. Taylor diagram comparing modeled net radiation, frictional velocity, sensible heat flux, and latent heat flux for different experiments with observations at the US-UMB FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S2. Same as Figure S1 but at DE-HAI FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S3. Same as Figure S1 but at the US-Me2 FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S4. Same as Figure S1 but at the US-MMS FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S5. Same as Figure S1, but at the AU-Tum FLUXNET station.  \nS2. Diurnal profiles  \nFigure 8 in the main text shows the diurnal profiles of net radiation, frictional velocity, sensible heat flux and latent heat flux for the US-UMB FLUXNET station averaged over the simulation time period. Figure S6 to S9 show similar plots but for DE-HAI, US-Me2, US-MMS and AU-Tum FLUXNET sites.  \nFigure S6. Averaged diurnal profiles of net radiation, frictional velocity, sensible heat flux, and latent heat flux for all the experiments at the DE-HAI Station.  \nFigure S7. Same as Figure S6 but for US-Me2 FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S8. Same as Figure S6 but for the US-MMS FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S9. Same as Figure S6 but for AU-Tum FLUXNET station.  \nS3. Soil moisture time series  \nFigure 9 in the main text shows the comparison of modeled and measured soil liquid water content at the US-UMB FLUXNET station. Here, the soil liquid water content is the same as volumetric soil moisture as there is no soil ice. The modeled soil moisture at the grid midpoints were matched to the nearest observational depths in Figure 9 . Figures S10 to S13 show similar plots for DE-HAI, US-Me2, US-MMS and, AU-Tum FLUXNET stations.  \nFigure S10. Soil liquid water (in this case, equals the volumetric soil moisture) simulation at different depths for various experiments conducted at the DE-HAI FLUXNET station. Note that the nearest model grid midpoint was chosen for comparison.  \nFigure S11. Same as Figure S10 but for US-Me2 FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S12. Same as Figure S10 but for the US-MMS FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S13. Same as Figure S10 but for AU-Tum FLUXNET station.  \nS4. Soil temperature time series  \nFigure 10 in the main text shows the comparison of modeled and measured soil temperature at the US-UMB FLUXNET station. The modeled soil temperature at the grid midpoints were matched to the nearest observational depths in Figure 10. Figures S14 to S17 show similar plots for DEHAI, US-Me2, US-MMS, AU-Tum FLUXNET stations.  \nFigure S14. Soil temperature simulation at different depths for various experiments conducted at the DE-HAI FLUXNET station. Note that the nearest model grid midpoint was chosen for comparison.  \nFigure S15. Same as Figure S14 but for the US-Me2 FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S16. Same as Figure S14 but for the US-MMS FLUXNET station.  \nFigure S17. Same as Figure S14 but for the AU-Tum FLUXNET station.","cbCailesFuedCtS3","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailesFuedCtS3","pdf",6626978,16,"English","# Supplement Figures\n## Taylor diagrams (S1)\n## Diurnal profiles (S2)\n## Soil moisture time series (S3)\n## Soil temperature time series (S4)","[{\"question\":\"What do the Taylor diagrams (S1) compare, and what does closeness to the red star indicate?\",\"answer\":\"They compare modeled net radiation, friction velocity, sensible heat flux, and latent heat flux against observations at multiple FLUXNET sites. Results plotted closer to the red star indicate better performance, reflecting higher correlation, more realistic variability, and lower centered RMSE.\"},{\"question\":\"Which figure section provides averaged diurnal profiles, and for which station are they shown?\",\"answer\":\"Section S2 describes diurnal profiles. Figure 8 gives the averaged profiles for the US-UMB FLUXNET station, and Figures S6–S9 provide similar plots for DE-HAI, US-Me2, US-MMS, and AU-Tum.\"},{\"question\":\"How are modeled soil moisture and soil temperature aligned with observations in S3 and S4?\",\"answer\":\"For soil moisture (S3) and soil temperature (S4), the modeled values at grid midpoints are matched to the nearest observational depths shown in Figures 9 and 10. The soil liquid water content is treated as volumetric soil moisture because there is no soil ice.\"}]","Taylor diagrams and soil profiles (Supplement Figures S1-S17) | PDF"]