[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-202212-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-202212-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","survey-of-existing-underground-openings-for-in-situ-experimental-facilities-april-1981-revised-july-1981-report","Survey of Existing Underground Openings for In-Situ Experimental Facilities - April 1981 Revised July 1981 - Report","","Survey compiles and evaluates existing underground openings suitable for in-situ experimental facilities for high level waste technical development. It inventories sites identified through literature search and later investigation, then applies stated criteria covering geologic setting, depth, hydrologic setting, workings, accessibility, and amenability of owners and operators. Sites are characterized and ranked across primary and secondary granitic, schistose rock, and volcanic rock categories, followed by recommendations and appendix descriptions of visited openings.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/survey-of-existing-underground-openings-for-in-situ-experimental-facilities-april-1981-revised-july-1981-report/202212/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/survey-of-existing-underground-openings-for-in-situ-experimental-facilities-april-1981-revised-july-1981-report/202212.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Eden","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-10","2026-09-04",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"该报告主要调查什么内容？","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"报告调查并评估可用于原位实验设施的现有地下开口/地下工程，并对相关地点进行汇总与分析。","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"用于筛选与评价站点的主要标准有哪些？",{"text":68,"@type":64},"标准包括地质环境、埋深、水文地质条件、地下工程/工作面特征、可达性，以及业主与运营方的适配性等。",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"报告如何对不同岩性类型的站点进行组织与排名？",{"text":72,"@type":64},"报告将站点按主要花岗岩、次要花岗岩、片麻岩（schistose rock）和火成岩（volcanic rock）等类别进行描述，并在各类别下形成特征与排名，最后给出建议。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},202212,1788543602,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1374391974468,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","DE82013707  \nSURVEY OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND OPENINGSFOR IN-SITU EXPERIMENTAL FACILITIES  \nMOTICE  \nPORT70NS OF THS BEPCRT AFELEILEIt has ea raproduceu tromte bestavalisbe eopy to permit the broadestpossibo availabiity.  \nH.Wollenberg,A.Graf,and B.Strisower  \nEarth Sciences DivisionLawrence Berkeley LaboratoryUniversity of CalifornlaBerkeley,California 94720  \nand  \nG.KorbinGeotechnical Consultant  \nоасиамин  \n\n|  |\n| --- |\n\nApri11981(Revised July 1981)  \nPrepared for  \nHigh Level Waste Technical Development BranchDIvision of Waste Management  \noffice of Nuclear Material safety and SafeguardsU.s.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington,D.c.20555  \nThis work was supported by the U.s.Department of Energyunder Contract No,W-7405-ENG-48 and by N.R.C.FIN No,B 3110-0under Interagency Agreement DOE 50-80-97  \nCONTENTS  \nPages  \nI1lustrations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv  \nTables…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………vii  \nSummary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1  \n1.Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3  \n2. Criteria…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………10  \n…………………………………………………10  \n2.1 Geologic Setting……………………………………  \n2.2 Depth……………………………………………………………………………………102.3 Hydrologic Setting……………………………………………………………………………………………………………11  \n2.4 Workings……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………11  \n2.5 Accessibility……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………12  \n2.6 Amenability of Owners and Operators……………………………………  \n……………………………12  \n…………………………………………………13  \n3.  \nsite Characteristics and Ranking of sites……………  \n3.1 Primary Granitic Rock sites…………………………………………………………………………………………14  \n3.2 Secondary Granitic sites ……………………………………………………………………………………………17  \n3.3 Schistose Rock sites………………………………………………………………………………………………………21  \n3.4 Volcanic Rock Sites……………………………………………………………………………………………………………24  \n4. Recommendations………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………27  \nAppendix A- Descriptions of Openings Visited……………………………………………………………………30  \nA.1 Primary Granitic Rock Sites…………………………………………………………………………………………30  \nA.1.1 He¹ms Pumpei Storage Project……………………………………………………30A.1.2 Tungsten Queen Mine ……………………………………………………………………………………………42  \nA.1.3 Mount Hope Mine …………………………………………………………………………………………………57  \nA.1.4 Minnamax Project…………………………………………………………………………………………74  \nA.2 Secondary Granitic Sites………………………  \nA.2.1 Dworshak Dam…………………………………  \nBalmat-Edwards Mines………………………  \nA.2.2  \nPine Creek Mine…………………………………………………  \nA.2.3  \nA.2.4 Emerson Mine……………………………………………………  \nA.2.5  \nColorado School of Mines student Mine  \nFairmont Mine…………………………………………………………  \nA.2.6  \nA.3 Schistose Rock sites………………………………………………………  \nA.3.1 Copperhill Operations…………………  \nA.3.2.Sunrise Mine………………………………………………  \nA.3.3 Sunshine Mine…………………………………………………  \nA.4 Volcanic Rock sites………………………………………………………  \n………………………………………………100  \nA.4.1 Oregon Dam Sites……………………………  \n………………………100  \nDetroit Dam………………………………………  \n…………………………………100  \nCougar Dam…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………101  \nLost Creek Dam……………………………………………………………………………………………………………101  \nReferences………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………103  \nILLUSTRATIONS  \nFigure 1. Locations of underground workings identified in initial  \nliterature search…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5  \nFigure 2. Locations of underground workings visited during this phase  \nof the investigation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………9  \nFigure 3. Location of Helms Pumped Storage Project,60 miles east of  \nFresno,California……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………31  \nFigure 4. original and modified layouts of underground powerhouse  \ncomplex,Helms Pumped Storage Project………………………………………………………………32  \nFigure 5. Plan and profile,Helms Pumped Storage Project…………………………………33  \nFigure 6. Portal to access tunnel,Helms Pumped Storage Project……………………35  \nFigure 7. Profile along possible alignment of access drift to  \nexperimental facility,Helms Punped Stora","cbCainaM3KxBhKGV","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainaM3KxBhKGV","pdf",1466786,110,"English","# Summary\n# Background\n## Geologic Setting\n## Depth\n## Hydrologic Setting\n## Workings\n## Accessibility\n## Amenability of Owners and Operators\n# Site Characteristics and Ranking of Sites\n## Primary Granitic Rock Sites\n## Secondary Granitic Sites\n## Schistose Rock Sites\n## Volcanic Rock Sites\n# Recommendations\n# Appendix A- Descriptions of Openings Visited\n## Primary Granitic Rock Sites\n## Secondary Granitic Sites\n## Schistose Rock Sites\n## Volcanic Rock Sites\n# References","[{\"question\":\"该报告主要调查什么内容？\",\"answer\":\"报告调查并评估可用于原位实验设施的现有地下开口/地下工程，并对相关地点进行汇总与分析。\"},{\"question\":\"用于筛选与评价站点的主要标准有哪些？\",\"answer\":\"标准包括地质环境、埋深、水文地质条件、地下工程/工作面特征、可达性，以及业主与运营方的适配性等。\"},{\"question\":\"报告如何对不同岩性类型的站点进行组织与排名？\",\"answer\":\"报告将站点按主要花岗岩、次要花岗岩、片麻岩（schistose rock）和火成岩（volcanic rock）等类别进行描述，并在各类别下形成特征与排名，最后给出建议。\"}]","Survey of Existing Underground Openings for In-Situ Experimental Facilities - April 1981 Revised July 1981 - Report | PDF",277]