[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-610641-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-610641-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","summary-of-the-amendments-to-the-tor-list-of-changes","Summary of the amendments to the TOR - List of changes","","Summary of amendments to the TOR, organized by page and paragraph references, detailing specific wording changes, additions, and removals. Key updates include revisions to “project” to read “project/s,” removal of duration wording in favor of bid-submission timing, replacement of “ceiling price” with “total price for year one (1),” and added B-BBEE status and scoring detail requirements. Evaluation criteria were restructured across LED, project plan, and risk management, adjusting point scales, removing zero-point criteria, adding staffing and process composition requirements, and updating equipment/warehousing and printer capacity thresholds.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/summary-of-the-amendments-to-the-tor-list-of-changes/610641/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/summary-of-the-amendments-to-the-tor-list-of-changes/610641.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Adam","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-04","2026-10-19",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":26},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What wording changes were made to the term “project” in the TOR?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The amendments add an “/s” so “project” reads “project/s” in multiple referenced sections. These updates appear in page 6 paragraph 6.3 and page 7 paragraph 6.14.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How did the pricing requirement change?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"The TOR replaces “ceiling price” with “total price for year one (1).” This replacement is reflected both in specific evaluation/scoring sheet updates and communicated in the briefing session.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How were the evaluation criteria and point scales revised (e.g., LED, project plan, and risk management)?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Zero-point criteria were removed and scales were revised across sections. LED was adjusted to a structured scale by categories (Designated groups, SMMEs, and Local communities), while project plan and risk management were revised to specific maximum scales with added process-related expectations.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},610641,1793051405,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":26,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":22,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":30},1374404737137,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Summary of the amendments to the TOR  \n1. Page 6, paragraph 6.3, bullet 2 and 3 added an “/s” in “project” and it reads as “project/s”  \n2. Page 7, paragraph 6.14 added an “/s” in “project” and it reads as “project/s”  \n3. Page 7, Paragraph 6.18 the “for the duration of the project” is removed and added “at the time of submitting the bid”  \n4. Page 7, paragraph 6. 10, the “ceiling price” is replaced with the “total price” and added “for year one (1)”  \n5. Page 7, paragraph 6. 12, added “full details of the B-BBEE status and scoring must be provided”  \n6. Page 11, Paragraph 9.1, added paragraph 9.1.2 – 9.1.3  \n7. Page 11 now changed from “more than one province” to “in all provinces” to be in line with paragraph 6.2 of the mandatory requirements.  \n8. Page 11, Evaluation criteria on the LED (Designated groups, SMMEs and Local communities), the zero (0) point criteria is removed, the criteria has been revised to have a Scale of 0 – 4/3/3 points in all the categories, namely, Designated groups = Scale of 0 – 4 points, SMMEs = Scale of 0 – 3 points and Local communities = Scale of 0 – 3 points.  \n9. Page 11, the LED has been reduced to 10 points  \n10. Page 15, Evaluation criteria number 4 “Labour capacity” has been revised to “Composition of labour force” The list of staff members required has been revised to “A List of positions must be submitted indicating the anticipated (gender/youth/persons with disabilities) of person/s to fill the position/s”  \n11. Page 16, the fleet points have been increased to 15 points.  \n12. Page 18, Evaluation criteria on Project Plan, the zero (0) point criteria is removed, the criteria has been revised to have a Scale of 0 – 15 points. Also added “as well as processes such as fully operational call centre, data management systems, processing of artwork, printing processes, pick and pack as well as deliveries and reporting, etc.  \n13. Page 18, Evaluation criteria on Risk management strategy, the zero (0) point criteria is removed. The criteria has been revised to have a Scale of 0 – 10 points  \n14. Page 15, valuation criteria c: Capacity of printers to do Inline die cutting for stickers. The“Capacity to do 1000 to 14 999 pages per hour” has been revised to “Capacity to do  \n10000 to 14 999 pages per hour”  \n15. Page 17 criteria no 6 9 (c) Warehousing. The Warehousing equipment has been revised to have a scale of 0 – 3 points.  \n16. The scoring sheet is amended, the “ceiling price” is replaced with the “total price for year one  \n(1)” as communicated in the briefing session.  \n17. Criteria 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 has added as per SC advice “This criterion is essential for the successful execution of the workbook project and therefore carries within itselfa minimum of 90%. A bidder must therefore score XX out of XX points”","cbCaipNurxHBYo5w","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaipNurxHBYo5w","pdf",74473,"English","# Amendments summary\n## Wording and requirement changes\n## Pricing and bid submissions\n## Added compliance and scoring details\n## Evaluation criteria updates\n## Staffing, operational capability, and risk management","[{\"question\":\"What wording changes were made to the term “project” in the TOR?\",\"answer\":\"The amendments add an “/s” so “project” reads “project/s” in multiple referenced sections. These updates appear in page 6 paragraph 6.3 and page 7 paragraph 6.14.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the pricing requirement change?\",\"answer\":\"The TOR replaces “ceiling price” with “total price for year one (1).” This replacement is reflected both in specific evaluation/scoring sheet updates and communicated in the briefing session.\"},{\"question\":\"How were the evaluation criteria and point scales revised (e.g., LED, project plan, and risk management)?\",\"answer\":\"Zero-point criteria were removed and scales were revised across sections. LED was adjusted to a structured scale by categories (Designated groups, SMMEs, and Local communities), while project plan and risk management were revised to specific maximum scales with added process-related expectations.\"}]","Summary of the amendments to the TOR - List of changes | PDF",1792379161]