[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-587744-105":59,"doc-detail-587744-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","study-review-protocol-and-supplement-to-the-what-works-clearinghouse-procedures-and-standards-handbook-version-50-version-51-december-2024-updates","Study Review Protocol and Supplement to the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 5.0 - Version 5.1 - December 2024 Updates","","Study Review Protocol and Supplement to the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 5.1, December 2024) supports WWC review teams in assessing studies under WWC Version 5.0 standards and related evidence synthesis. It defines eligible outcome domains and the types of outcome measures within each domain, clarifies guidance shared via the WWC Help Desk, and updates the prior protocol to refine outcome domains. It also explains rules for eligibility, re-review conditions across versions, and crosswalk use when synthesizing outcomes across protocol versions.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/study-review-protocol-and-supplement-to-the-what-works-clearinghouse-procedures-and-standards-handbook-version-50-version-51-december-2024-updates/587744/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/study-review-protocol-and-supplement-to-the-what-works-clearinghouse-procedures-and-standards-handbook-version-50-version-51-december-2024-updates/587744.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Melati","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-05","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of the WWC Study Review Protocol, Version 5.1?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It guides WWC reviews of studies by defining how studies are reviewed under the WWC’s procedures and standards and how review teams apply the protocol. It also supports systematic review use with related guidance for literature search and eligibility criteria.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What does the protocol say about eligible outcome domains?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It provides a structured list of eligible outcome domains and describes the types of outcome measures that fit within each domain, organized by topical categories and alphabetized within categories.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Can studies reviewed under Version 5.0 be re-reviewed under Version 5.1?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Generally, studies previously reviewed under Version 5.0 should not be re-reviewed under Version 5.1 unless there is a specific justification approved by IES leadership. A simplified process may apply when a study previously reviewed under Version 4.1 or Version 5.0 needs review under Version 5.1.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},587744,1792165479,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":56,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962085570644,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","WHAT WORKS  \nCLEARINGHOUSETM  \nStudy Review Protocol and Supplement to the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 5.0  \nVersion 5.1 (December 2024)  \nThe What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Study Review Protocol accompanies the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 5.0 and guides reviews of studies by the WWC. The WWC uses this protocol to review all studies, including those cited as evidence for U.S. Department of Education grant competitions, studies that were funded by the Department, and studies identified for systematic reviews of evidence based on a search of the research literature in a particular topic area. When the Study Review Protocol is used to review studies for systematic reviews, an accompanying topic area synthesis protocol will provide criteria for the literature search; guidance on how to identify and prioritize relevant studies for review and inclusion in evidence synthesis products; and guidance on intervention, sample, and outcome eligibility criteria for the synthesis (see page 10 in the Handbook) .  \nThis protocol updates the Study Review Protocol, Version 5.0 to clarify outcome domains and to formalize guidance and clarifications to the Handbook shared through the WWC Help Desk. Review teams should use the Version 5.1 Study Review Protocol for all new reviews conducted under Version 5.0 standards, except for systematic reviews already in progress.  \nContents  \nELIGIBLE OUTCOME DOMAINS ....................... 2  \nAcademic Readiness, Knowledge, or Skills (Preschool through Postsecondary).............. 3  \nGeneral Achievement ............................... 3  \nLanguage Arts .......................................... 4  \nMathematics............................................. 6  \nScience .................................................... 6  \nOther ....................................................... 7  \nPreschool through Grade 12 Progress and Completion ................................................. 7  \nPostsecondary Progress and Success ............ 8  \nWorkforce Outcomes .................................. 9  \nSocial, Emotional, Behavioral, and Mental Health Outcomes (Preschool through Postsecondary) ......................................... 10  \nSchool and Family Outcomes and Educational Opportunity (Preschool through Postsecondary) .......................................... 11  \nSchool Leader Outcomes ............................ 13  \nTeacher Outcomes ..................................... 13  \nOther .........................................................14  \nMAIN VERSUS SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS ..... 15  \nBASELINE EQUIVALENCE .............................. 17  \nOTHER .......................................................... 18  \nWWC products may synthesize findings from studies reviewed under the Version 5.0 and Version 5.1 Study Review Protocols if the outcome domains are substantively the same across the versions. Acrosswalk of outcome domains can be found on the WWC website. Studies that were previously reviewed under Study Review Protocol, Version 5.0 should not be re-reviewed under the Study Review Protocol, Version 5.1 unless there is a specific justification made by review team leadership and approved by IES. Ifa study was previously reviewed under the Version 4.1 (version 1.0 or version 4.1 Study Review Protocol) or Version 5.0 standards and needs to be reviewed under the Study Review Protocol, Version 5.1, a simplified review process can occur where only one reviewer and one reconciler review the study.  \nThe Handbook specifies the eligibility criteria for studies of educational interventions to be reviewed by the WWC. The criteria include eligible research reports, eligible research designs, eligible populations, eligible interventions, and eligible outcomes. Findings that are not publicly available and/or are not included in a complete manuscript are not eligible for review. Author queries may obtain other information that is necessary for a review b","cbCaiiIhPS9jWhdB","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiiIhPS9jWhdB","pdf",177709,"English","# Contents\n## Eligible Outcome Domains\n## Main Versus Supplemental Findings\n## Baseline Equivalence\n## Other","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the WWC Study Review Protocol, Version 5.1?\",\"answer\":\"It guides WWC reviews of studies by defining how studies are reviewed under the WWC’s procedures and standards and how review teams apply the protocol. It also supports systematic review use with related guidance for literature search and eligibility criteria.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the protocol say about eligible outcome domains?\",\"answer\":\"It provides a structured list of eligible outcome domains and describes the types of outcome measures that fit within each domain, organized by topical categories and alphabetized within categories.\"},{\"question\":\"Can studies reviewed under Version 5.0 be re-reviewed under Version 5.1?\",\"answer\":\"Generally, studies previously reviewed under Version 5.0 should not be re-reviewed under Version 5.1 unless there is a specific justification approved by IES leadership. A simplified process may apply when a study previously reviewed under Version 4.1 or Version 5.0 needs review under Version 5.1.\"}]","Study Review Protocol and Supplement to the What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 5.0 - Version 5.1 - December 2024 Updates | PDF",1792062880,48]