[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-595789-105":59,"doc-detail-595789-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","students-evaluation-of-teacher-attributes-implications-for-quality-in-higher-education","Students’ Evaluation of Teacher Attributes: Implications for Quality in Higher Education","","Student evaluation of teacher attributes frames the value of higher-education quality through learners’ perceptions. The study examines how 960 university students in Lahore, Pakistan, rate five teacher-attribute domains: student development, teacher professionalism, teaching style, student motivation, and teacher personality. Descriptive and inferential statistics using an adapted 5-point Likert scale compare student responses. Personality ranks highest and student development lowest, with overall levels high, and faculty-development support recommended.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/students-evaluation-of-teacher-attributes-implications-for-quality-in-higher-education/595789/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/students-evaluation-of-teacher-attributes-implications-for-quality-in-higher-education/595789.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Fans","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What aspects of teacher attributes were evaluated in this study?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Students evaluated teacher attributes across five domains: student development, teacher professionalism, teaching style, student motivation, and teacher personality.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How was student feedback collected and analyzed?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Feedback came from 960 university students using an adapted 5-point Likert-type scale, analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics to rate and compare responses.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Which teacher attribute received the highest and lowest student ratings?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Teacher personality received the highest rating, while student development received the lowest rating among the five factors.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},595789,1792144252,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},5909892330395,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","Students’ Evaluation of Teacher Attributes: Implications for Quality in Higher Education  \nShaukat Ali Raza * and Muhammad Irfan**  \nAbstract  \nThe abstract nature of quality in higher education establishes the worth of students’ perception to evaluate this quality. This study explores the perception of 960 university students from Lahore, Pakistan, regarding the attributes of their teachers in terms of student development, teacher professionalism, teaching style, student motivation, and teacher personality. Descriptive and inferential statistics have been employed to rate and compare responses obtained through an adapted 5-point Likert type scale. Students have rated teacher personality as the highest and student development as the lowest factor in order of their preference. The overall level of attributes of university teachers in respect of all the five sub-scales is found to be at a high level. The study recommends faculty development initiatives particularly for the teachers from computer sciences, IT and commerce disciplines to help them develop their listed attributes to enhance quality in higher education leading to the realization of stipulated higher education objectives.  \nKeywords: Students’ perception, Teacher attributes, Quality in higher education  \n* Assistant Professor, IER, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan. Email: [shaukat.ier@pu.edu.pk](shaukat.ier@pu.edu.pk)  \n** M. Phil. Scholar, IER, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.  \nIntroduction  \nOwing to the growing competition in higher education, universities are experiencing a paradigm shift in the status of their students (Raza, Majid, & Zia, 2010) as fee paying customers who select universities, programs of study and their majors in the same way as they select commodities from the shopping malls (Raza & Khawaja, 2013). Therefore, universities are supposed to hire teachers with most desirable attributes (Raza, 2014) in order to attract and retain students (Douglas, McClelland, & Davies, 2008; Helgesen & Nesset, 2007) to be economically efficient (Joseph, Yakhou, & Stone, 2005) in their completion for survival.  \nAttributes encompass a broad range of knowledge, skills, and attitudes to complete a task or solve a problem to become effective on the job (Raza, 2014; Guntuku & Meesala, 2013); Mulder, Gulikers, Biemans, & Wesselink, 2009) . These attributes available in categories like student development, teacher professionalism, teaching style, student motivation, and teacher personality (Raza, 2014) are the key determinants of quality in higher education (Raza & Naqvi, 2011) which is the demand of all stakeholders (Raza, 2012) . The quality in higher education, is a service quality, and could be judged only through the perception of its users, the students in this case (Raza & Naqvi, 2011) .  \nThis study was, therefore, designed to evaluate the attributes of university teachers in terms of student development, teacher professionalism, teaching style, student motivation, and teacher personality as perceived by students and discuss implications thereof for quality in higher education.  \nReview of literature  \nAttribute is a quality that belongs to a specific person or thing. It is usually a good inherent quality or characteristic that someone or something has, for example, patience is a good attribute for a teacher (Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2015) . These are sets of qualities that cover a broad range of potentials or capabilities for cognitive (knowledge), psychomotor (skills), and affective (attitudes) domains required for task completion and problem solving needed for realizing organizational, job or professional goals (Raza, 2014; Guntuku & Meesala, 2013; Mulder, Gulikers, Biemans, & Wesselink, 2009) . Literature on higher education provides different categories of teacher attributes.  \nCategories of teacher attributes  \nRaza (2012) has provided a comprehensive account of attributes of university teachers necessary to equip them for inculc","cbCaiqGJpuWLeX7c","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqGJpuWLeX7c","pdf",156702,18,"English","# Introduction\n## Attributes and quality in higher education\n# Review of literature\n## Categories of teacher attributes\n## Student development\n## Teacher professionalism","[{\"question\":\"What aspects of teacher attributes were evaluated in this study?\",\"answer\":\"Students evaluated teacher attributes across five domains: student development, teacher professionalism, teaching style, student motivation, and teacher personality.\"},{\"question\":\"How was student feedback collected and analyzed?\",\"answer\":\"Feedback came from 960 university students using an adapted 5-point Likert-type scale, analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics to rate and compare responses.\"},{\"question\":\"Which teacher attribute received the highest and lowest student ratings?\",\"answer\":\"Teacher personality received the highest rating, while student development received the lowest rating among the five factors.\"}]","Students’ Evaluation of Teacher Attributes: Implications for Quality in Higher Education | PDF",1792081869,45]