[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-589060-105":59,"doc-detail-589060-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","strategies-for-organising-and-managing-research-at-universities-systemic-review","STRATEGIES FOR ORGANISING AND MANAGING RESEARCH AT UNIVERSITIES - SYSTEMIC REVIEW","","Systemic review identifies and synthesises interventions used to build strategies for organising and managing university research that are feasible in Ukraine. The study applies descriptive content analysis to empirical, experimental, review, conceptual, and commentary sources, focusing on strategy design rather than detailed research outcomes. Findings show growth and corporate-type strategies as dominant, particularly in the USA and EU, with an emphasis on cost-effective opportunities and international branding. Institutional strategic management through sector cooperation is most feasible for Ukraine, with project-management communities as a second option. Financial criteria guide intervention assessment, while state-level demand-oriented reforms can stimulate research by reshaping personnel management and evaluation.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/strategies-for-organising-and-managing-research-at-universities-systemic-review/589060/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/strategies-for-organising-and-managing-research-at-universities-systemic-review/589060.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Nguyễn Văn Học","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":81},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the main purpose of the study?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"To identify and synthesise interventions that can build strategies for organising and managing research at universities and that are feasible in Ukraine.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What method is used in the review?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Descriptive content analysis of empirical, experimental, review, conceptual, and commentary sources describing university research organisation and management strategies.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Which strategies are reported as most dominant and why are they relevant for Ukraine?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Growth and corporate-type strategies are dominant, especially in the USA and EU, and institutional strategic research management based on cooperation across sectors is highlighted as the most feasible approach for the Ukrainian context.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},589060,1792451812,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":81,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1374402739827,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/14000c97e7351f1a627?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1787885694763230660","DOI: 10.20535/2410-8286 .227831  \nSTRATEGIES FOR ORGANISING AND MANAGING RESEARCH AT UNIVERSITIES:  \nSYSTEMIC REVIEW  \nKateryna Shykhnenko  \nInstitute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection, Kyiv, Ukraine  \n[shikhkate@gmail.com](shikhkate@gmail.com)  \nAlina Sbruieva  \nSumy Makarenko State Pedagogical University, Sumy, Ukraine  \n[sbruieva@gmail.com](sbruieva@gmail.com)  \nThe purpose of the study was to identify and synthesise the interventions used to build the strategies for organising and managing research at universities that can be feasible in Ukraine. To achieve this purpose we provided a descriptive profile of the interventionsand strategies used at universities to organise and manage research, rather than the detailed examination of substantive research results. The method of descriptive content analysis was applied to analyse empirical, experimental, review, conceptual, and commentary sources revealing strategies of organising and managing research at universities. The growth and corporate type strategies are dominant at universities, particularly in the USA and EU. The universities mainly seek cost-effective research opportunities that can help the institutions build a strong international brand. The policy of institutional strategic research management aimed at cooperation in research with other sectors seems to be the most feasible and appropriate for the Ukrainian research management context. Creating project management communities was found to be the second most feasible and appropriate strategy of organising and managing the university research in Ukraine. Financial criterion dominates in assessing the interventions for building a strategy of organising and managing research at universities. The university research can be stimulated at the state level through a demand-oriented reform that is aimed at reshaping the management of personnel, talent selection system, and personnel assessment.  \nKeywords: higher education; universities; university research; strategies for organising research; strategies for managing research.  \nIntroduction  \nStrategies for organising and managing research have been increasingly important in building university research capacity at modern universities (Nguyen & Meek, 2015) . The problem of organising and managing the university research seems to be quite relevant for the context of the research at universities in Ukraine because this activity largely relies on the former Soviet regime-run model which stipulates that the research is conducted by separate, non-educational, government-funded entities (institutions) that form a closed research community with its ‘rules of a game’ and privileged researchers working full-time (Kiopa et al., 2016) . As a result, the research activities and outputs fail to compete internationally, and attract direct investments, lack trust of the buyers of innovations, and accelerates the outflow of perspective junior researchers abroad. Throughout the recent decade, the government has been legally and finically encouraging higher education institutions to dedicate more efforts to research capacity making it a primary mission and thus improve the university research output (VRU, 2016) . Given this, universities are looking for and adopting feasible and transferable international strategies of organising and managing research at universities in Ukraine. This created the gap to be addressed by the present systemic review.  \nLiterature review  \nThe strategies of organising and managing research at universities are revealed in the literature from the perspective of two key trends such as creating a strong brand for a university and transforming a university into a corporate business venture. These strategies are found to be strongly related to funding schemes. For example, performance funding is widely used in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (UK) . The tenders for research funding are commonly used in Japan and Germany. Matching grants ar","cbCaifgZ5kB4Bi4G","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifgZ5kB4Bi4G","pdf",553532,11,"English","# Introduction\n## Problem context in Ukraine\n# Literature review\n## Two key trends: branding and corporate transformation\n## Funding scheme examples\n## Categorisations by institutional goals and strategy types","[{\"question\":\"What is the main purpose of the study?\",\"answer\":\"To identify and synthesise interventions that can build strategies for organising and managing research at universities and that are feasible in Ukraine.\"},{\"question\":\"What method is used in the review?\",\"answer\":\"Descriptive content analysis of empirical, experimental, review, conceptual, and commentary sources describing university research organisation and management strategies.\"},{\"question\":\"Which strategies are reported as most dominant and why are they relevant for Ukraine?\",\"answer\":\"Growth and corporate-type strategies are dominant, especially in the USA and EU, and institutional strategic research management based on cooperation across sectors is highlighted as the most feasible approach for the Ukrainian context.\"}]","STRATEGIES FOR ORGANISING AND MANAGING RESEARCH AT UNIVERSITIES - SYSTEMIC REVIEW | PDF",1792066473,28]