[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33707-en":3,"doc-seo-33707-105":30},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":21,"is_downloadable":21,"audit_status":21,"page_count":22,"language":23,"language_code":24,"site_id":25,"html_lang":24,"table_of_contents":26,"faqs":27,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},33707,7971461740909,"Levi","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d",8,"Research & Report","Still Searching for the Pineal Gland? Reading the Ricoeur-Changeux Debate in Terms of Meillassoux’s Critique of Correlationism","The spectacular progress in neurobiology and neuroscience keeps the brain–mind relation central to philosophy. A dialogue between Paul Ricoeur and neurobiologist Jean-Pierre Changeux from around 1998 is treated as an interdisciplinary resource for rethinking this issue. The article interprets both positions through Quentin Meillassoux’s concept of correlationism to uncover overlooked affinities and to suggest expanding the dialogue’s scope beyond shared assumptions. It then examines what such broadening would require in Meillassoux’s anti-correlationism, while rejecting it in favor of hyper-correlationism.","","cbCaidjxzix5Az7M","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidjxzix5Az7M","pdf",599589,2,1,20,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n## Ricoeur–Changeux debate and the mind–brain problem\n## Interpreting the debate via correlationism\n## Broadening the framework: anti-correlationism and hyper-correlationism","[{\"question\":\"What is the main philosophical problem addressed in the article?\",\"answer\":\"The article focuses on the relation between the brain and the mind, which remains current due to advances in neurobiology and neuroscience.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the article use Meillassoux’s framework to analyze Ricoeur and Changeux?\",\"answer\":\"It interprets both Ricoeur’s and Changeux’s positions through Quentin Meillassoux’s notion of correlationism to highlight similarities and to reconsider the dialogue’s scope.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the article conclude about Meillassoux’s anti-correlationism?\",\"answer\":\"It investigates what broadening would entail in terms of Meillassoux’s anti-correlationism but rejects that approach in favor of what the article calls hyper-correlationism.\"}]",1782214613,50,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":25,"language":24,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":28},"still-searching-for-the-pineal-gland-reading-the-ricoeur-changeux-debate-in-terms-of-meillassouxs-critique-of-correlationism",{"@graph":35,"@context":84},[36,52,67],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,46,49],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/still-searching-for-the-pineal-gland-reading-the-ricoeur-changeux-debate-in-terms-of-meillassouxs-critique-of-correlationism/33707/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"inLanguage":24,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":40,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-03","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"What is the main philosophical problem addressed in the article?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"The article focuses on the relation between the brain and the mind, which remains current due to advances in neurobiology and neuroscience.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"How does the article use Meillassoux’s framework to analyze Ricoeur and Changeux?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"It interprets both Ricoeur’s and Changeux’s positions through Quentin Meillassoux’s notion of correlationism to highlight similarities and to reconsider the dialogue’s scope.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"What does the article conclude about Meillassoux’s anti-correlationism?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"It investigates what broadening would entail in terms of Meillassoux’s anti-correlationism but rejects that approach in favor of what the article calls hyper-correlationism.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":86,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":25}]