[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-316574-105":59,"doc-detail-316574-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","state-of-ohio-state-employment-relations-board-opinion","STATE OF OHIO - STATE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD - OPINION","","Opinion of the State Employment Relations Board addressing whether several petitions challenging rebate determinations filed by June A. Logan and other petitioners against the Ohio Education Association should be dismissed. The Board reviews the procedural history, including remand for further facts and analysis, and applies Ohio Revised Code standards requiring timely SERB challenges and specifications of arbitrary or capricious determinations within statutory time limits.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/state-of-ohio-state-employment-relations-board-opinion/316574/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/state-of-ohio-state-employment-relations-board-opinion/316574.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Logic","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-09-20",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is the central issue in the Board’s review?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The issue is whether the petitions should be dismissed under the grounds asserted in the Ohio Education Association’s motion to dismiss.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What statutory timing requirement governed the petitions?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"A challenge must be filed with SERB within thirty days of the determination date; otherwise the petitions are dismissed.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"Why did the Board treat the petitions as fatally defective?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The petitions were filed before the impartial decision maker issued the final rebate determination, so the “within thirty days” requirement could not be satisfied.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},316574,1790298295,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},1099513958762,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1000023916a998db790?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1784791008015729253","# STATE OF OHIOSTATE EMPLOYMENT RELA7IONS BOARD\n\nIn the Matter of  \nJune A.Logan,et al.,Petitioners,  \nand  \nOhio Education Association,Employee Organization.  \nCASE NUMBERS:  \n91-RBT-01-000492-RBT·12-0015  \n92-RBT-01-000692-RBT-12-0016  \n92-RBT-12-001292-RBT-12-0037  \n92-RBT-12-001492-RBT-12-0020  \n92-RBT-12-0021  \n## OPINIUN\n\nPOTTENGER,VICE CHAIRMAN:  \nJune A.Logan,Lou A.Scullion,Frances K.Possage,Oscar W.Davidson,Ona M.Strudthoff,Carole A.Bricker,Virginia L.Campbell,and Mary Jo Byers fied petitions tochallengerebate determinations made by the same employee organization,the Ohio EducationAssociaticn(\"OEA\").The OEA subsequently filed amotion to dismiss each of these petitions.The issue presented for review is whether the petitions should be dismissed pursuant to th9grounds alleged in the OEA's motion tc dismiss.  \n## 1.  BACKGROUND\n\nOn November 18,1994,a Hearing Officer's Recommended Determination was issuedrecommending that the motion be granted.Petitioners filed exceptions to the HearingOfficer's Recommended Determination.The Employee Organization filed a response to theexceptions.The Board reviewed the Hearing Officer's Recommended Determination,exceptions and the response to the exceptions.The Board remanded the motion to dismissin the cases cited above to the hearing officer for further facts and analysis,by BoardDirective dated March 3,1995.  \nAfter the remand,the Hearing Officer's Recommended Determination was issued onApril 7,1995.Petitioners filed exceptions on April 17,1995.The Employee Organizatianfiled its response to the exceptions on April 19,1995.  \n## .  DISCUSSION\n\nOhio Revised Code(0.R.C.)§4117.09(C)provides in pertinent part:  \nAny public employee organization representing public employees pursuant tothis chapter shall prescribe an internal procedure to determine a robate,if any,for nonmembers which conforms to federal law,provided a nonmember makesa timely demand on the empleyee organization.Absent arbitrary and capriciousaction,such determination is conclusive on the parties except that a challengeto the determination mav be filed with the state employment relations boardwithin thirty.days of the determination date specifying the arbitrary orcapricious nature of the determination and the board shall review the rebatedetermination and decide whether it was arbitrary or capricious....  \nThe internal rebate procedure shall provide for a rebate of expendituresin support of partisan politics or ideological causes not gormane to the work ofemployee organizations in the realm of collective bargaining.(emphasis added).  \nIn determining whether to grant the motion to dismiss,the petitions will be evaluatedin accordance with the standard announced in in re Heitger,SERB 95-004(3-28-95):  \nThus,the statute sets forth certain requirements a petitioner must meet:  \n1.A petitioner must make a timely demand on the employee organizationfor a rebate of nonchargeable expenditures under the employeeorganization's internal procedure.  \n2.After the employee organization's rebate determination is issued,apetitioner must file a challenge with the State Employment RelationsBoard (SERB):  \na.Within thirty days of the determination date,and  \nb.The chailenge must specify the arbitrary or capricious nature ofthe determination.  \nf a petitioner does not comply with each of these requirements,then thepetition will be dismissed.  \nId.at 3-20.  \n100  \n53  \nThe OEA's motion does not 3llege that any of the Petitioners failed to make a timelydemand for a rebate under its procedures.From the record,it appears that each of thePetitioners complied with this requirement.  \nA.   After the employee organization's rebate determination is issued,s petitionermust file a challenge with SERB within thirty days of the determination date.  \nOne ground for the OEA's motion to dismiss is that each of the Petitioners did notattach a copy of the determination challenged to their petition,or state that one wasunavailable.What the Petitioners did attach was ","cbCaidlaHiy4VsZO","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidlaHiy4VsZO","pdf",155596,"English","# OPINION\n## Background\n## Discussion\n## Requirements for Petition Dismissal","[{\"question\":\"What is the central issue in the Board’s review?\",\"answer\":\"The issue is whether the petitions should be dismissed under the grounds asserted in the Ohio Education Association’s motion to dismiss.\"},{\"question\":\"What statutory timing requirement governed the petitions?\",\"answer\":\"A challenge must be filed with SERB within thirty days of the determination date; otherwise the petitions are dismissed.\"},{\"question\":\"Why did the Board treat the petitions as fatally defective?\",\"answer\":\"The petitions were filed before the impartial decision maker issued the final rebate determination, so the “within thirty days” requirement could not be satisfied.\"}]","STATE OF OHIO - STATE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD - OPINION | PDF",1789918964,13]