[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-269339-105":59,"doc-detail-269339-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","standard-oil-company-of-california-consent-order","Standard Oil Company of California - Consent Order","","Consent order in Docket 8827 addressing alleged violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act by the Standard Oil Company of California and Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc. The order concerns advertising representations that the F-310 additive in Chevron gasoline would produce pollution-free exhaust. The decision requires cessation of specified deceptive claims and dismisses certain subparagraphs in paragraphs Five and Six of the complaint. Proceedings include appearances for both the Commission and respondents.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/standard-oil-company-of-california-consent-order/269339/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/standard-oil-company-of-california-consent-order/269339.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Sage","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":46},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What was the alleged violation described in the FTC complaint?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The complaint alleged that the respondents violated the Federal Trade Commission Act through advertising misrepresentations regarding the F-310 additive in Chevron gasoline.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What was the specific claim about F-310 that was challenged?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The advertisements represented that F-310 would produce pollution-free exhaust and reduce emissions in a manner communicated to the public.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What actions did the consent order require and what parts were dismissed?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The consent order required a San Francisco distributor and its New York City advertising agency to cease misrepresenting the pollution-free effect of F-310. It further dismissed certain subparagraphs of paragraphs Five and Six of the complaint.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},269339,1789450469,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":46,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},687197207057,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","IN THE MATTER OF  \nSTANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA,ET AL.  \nCONSENT ORDER,ETC.,IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THEFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT  \nDocket 8827.  Complaint,Dec.29,1970-Decision,Nov.26,1974*  \nConsent order requiring a San Francisco,Calif.,distributor of gasoline and other petroleum products and its New York City advertising agency,among other things tocease misrepresenting that the F-310 additive in its Chevron gasoline will producepollution-free exhaust.The order further dismisses certain subparagraphs of para-graphs Five and Six of the complaint.  \nAppearances  \nFor the Commission:Fauster Vittone and Jean F.Greene.For the respondents:Turner H.MeBaine,James Michael,WilliamC.Miller,Gary H.Anderson,Roland W.Selman,Pillsbury,Madison &Sutro for Standard Oil Company of California,San Francisco,Calif.,William D.Greene,Laurence P.J.Bonaguidi,Burns,Van Kirk,Greene&Kafer for Batten,Barton,Durstine &Osborn,Inc.,New York,N.Y.and David J.McKean,McKean,Whitehead &Wilson,Wash.,D.C.  \nCoMPLAINT  \nPursuant to the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act,andby virtue of the authority vested in it by said Act,the Federal TradeCommission,having reason to believe that Standard Oil Company ofCalifornia,a corporation,and Batten,Barton,Durstine &Osborn,Inc.,acorporation hereinafter referred to as respondents,have violated theprovisions of said Act,and it appearing to the Commission that aproceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest,hereby issues its complaint stating its charges in that respect as follows:  \nPARAGRAPH 1.Respondent Standard Oil Company of California is acorporation organized,existing and doing business under and by virtueof the laws of the State of Delaware,with its principal office and placeof business located at 225 Bush Street,San Francisco,Calif.  \nRespondent Batten,Barton,Durstine &Osborn,Inc.,is a corporationorganized,existing and doing business under and by virtue of the lawsof the State of New York,with its principal office and place of businesslocated at 383 Madison Avenue,New York,N.Y.  \nFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DECISIONS  \nComplaint  \nPAR.2.Respondent Standard Oil Company of California is now,andfor some time past has been,engaged in the sale and distribution ofgasoline and other petroleum products under the trade name Chevronand other names to the public.  \nRespondent Batten,Barton,Durstine &Osborn,Inc.is now and forsome time past has been an advertising agency of Standard Oil Com-pany of California;and now prepares and places,and for some time pasthas prepared and placed for publication,advertising material includingbut not limited to the advertising referred to herein,for the purpose ofpromoting the sale of respondent Standard Oil of California's Chevrongasolines with F-310.  \nPAR.3.Respondent Standard Oil Company of California in the courseand conduct of its business as aforesaid now causes and for some timepast has caused its said products,when sold,to be shipped from its placeof business in the State of California to purchasers thereof located invarious other States of the United States,and maintains,and at alltimes mentioned herein has maintained,a substantial couse of trade insaid products in commerce,as“commerce”is defined in the FederalTrade Commission Act.  \nPAR.4.In the course and conduct of their businesses as aforesaid,and for the purpose of inducing the purchase of Chevron gasolinescontaining F-310,trademark for a polybutene amine gasoline detergentadditive,the respondents have made,and are now making,numerousstatements and representations in advertisements published in newspa-pers and magazines and in other promotional material,and by means oftelevision and radio broadcasts.  \nTypical of the statements and representations contained in said ad-vertisements,but not all inclusive,are the following:  \nTELEVISION  \nSCOTT CARPENTER:I'′m Scott Carpenter.We’re attaching a clear balloon to this car toshow you one of the most meaningful gasoline achievements in history.","cbCaiekbtQQGQ7zA","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiekbtQQGQ7zA","pdf",8989095,93,"English","# Complaint\n## Appearances\n## Paragraph 1\n## Paragraph 2\n## Paragraph 3\n## Paragraph 4","[{\"question\":\"What was the alleged violation described in the FTC complaint?\",\"answer\":\"The complaint alleged that the respondents violated the Federal Trade Commission Act through advertising misrepresentations regarding the F-310 additive in Chevron gasoline.\"},{\"question\":\"What was the specific claim about F-310 that was challenged?\",\"answer\":\"The advertisements represented that F-310 would produce pollution-free exhaust and reduce emissions in a manner communicated to the public.\"},{\"question\":\"What actions did the consent order require and what parts were dismissed?\",\"answer\":\"The consent order required a San Francisco distributor and its New York City advertising agency to cease misrepresenting the pollution-free effect of F-310. It further dismissed certain subparagraphs of paragraphs Five and Six of the complaint.\"}]","Standard Oil Company of California - Consent Order | PDF",234]