[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-184124-en":3,"doc-seo-184124-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":92},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},184124,13056712833777,"Paura","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0",8,"Research & Report","Speaking Skills Analysis","This document presents a detailed statistical analysis of speaking skills, focusing on pre-test, post-test, and attainment test scores for both experimental and control groups. The data highlights significant differences in speaking proficiency between the groups across all testing stages. Specifically, the experimental group shows a marked improvement from pre-test to post-test and attainment test, with p-values indicating statistical significance (p \u003C 0.05 for pre-test, p = 0.00 for post-test, and p = 0.00 for attainment test). In contrast, the control group exhibits less pronounced changes, with some indications of improvement but also specific tests showing less significant results (p = 0.03 for post-test, p = 0.11 for attainment test). The analysis further categorizes speaking skills into Improvement, Synchronization, Extraction, Modification, and Practicing, providing the frequency and percentage for each, along with illustrative metaphors used by participants to describe their speaking experiences. The metaphors offer a qualitative insight into how individuals perceive and conceptualize the development of their speaking abilities, ranging from practical analogies like 'Bridge' and 'Meal' for improvement, to more abstract concepts such as 'Labyrinth' and 'Sculptor' for synchronization and modification. This comprehensive data set is crucial for understanding the effectiveness of interventions aimed at enhancing speaking skills and for identifying specific areas that require further attention and development.","| Speaking | Groups | df | p* |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Pre-test | Experimental | 32 | 0.03 |\n|  | Control | 44 | 0.00 |\n| Post-test | Experimental | 32 | 0.00 |\n|  | Control | 44 | 0.03 |\n| Attainment test | Experimental | 32 | 0.00 |\n|  | Control\u003Cbr>| 44 | 0.11 |\n\n\n| Speaking | Groups | N | x\u003Cbr>̄ | U | Z | p* | K–S test |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Pre-test | Experimental | 32 | 30.22 | 439.00 | 32 | 0.03 | 0.33 |\n|  | Control | 44 | 44.52 |  | 44 | 0.00 |  |\n| Post-test | Experimental | 32 | 51.44 | 290.00 | 32 | 0.00 | 0.52 |\n|  | Control | 44 | 29.09 |  | 44 | 0.03 |  |\n| Attainment test | Experimental | 32 | 57.64 | 91.50 | 32 | 0.00 | 0.77 |\n|  | Control | 44 | 24.58 |  | 44 | 0.11 |  |\n\n\n| Skills | Categories | f | % | .\u003Cbr>Metaphors |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Speaking | Improvement | 7 | 21.9 | Meal (1), Bridge (1), Play (1), River (1), Clay (1), River (2) |\n|  | Synchronization | 7 | 21.9 | Statue (1), Labyrinth (1), Chess (1), Pilot (1), Sculptor (1), Shadows (1), Melody (1) |\n|  | Extraction | 5 | 15.6 | Spaceship (1), Meal (1), Galaxy (1), Sand Dunes (1), Fireflies (1) |\n|  | Modification | 5 | 15.6 | Plant (1), Waves (1), Painting (1), Puzzle (1), Painting (1) |\n|  | Practicing | 8 | 25.0 | Potion (1), Garden (1), Tapestry (1), Origami (1), Mosaic (1), Symphony (3) |","cbCaim41kmR3ei0m","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaim41kmR3ei0m","pdf",646682,1,14,"English","en",105,"# Speaking Skills Analysis\n## Pre-test, Post-test, and Attainment Test Data\n## Speaking Skills Categories and Metaphors","[{\"question\":\"What were the main findings regarding speaking skill improvement in the experimental group?\",\"answer\":\"The experimental group showed statistically significant improvements in speaking skills across pre-test, post-test, and attainment tests, with p-values of 0.03, 0.00, and 0.00 respectively.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the control group's speaking skills compare to the experimental group?\",\"answer\":\"The control group showed less significant improvements compared to the experimental group, particularly in the post-test (p=0.03) and attainment test (p=0.11), indicating a smaller impact of any non-experimental factors.\"},{\"question\":\"What categories were used to analyze speaking skills, and what examples of metaphors were provided?\",\"answer\":\"Speaking skills were categorized into Improvement, Synchronization, Extraction, Modification, and Practicing. Metaphors included 'Meal', 'Bridge', 'Play' for improvement, and 'Statue', 'Labyrinth', 'Chess' for synchronization.\"}]","Speaking Skills Analysis | PDF",1788356301,35,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":34,"description":14,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":87,"head_meta":89,"extra_data":91,"updated_unix":28},"speaking-skills-analysis","",{"@graph":36,"@context":86},[37,54,69],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/speaking-skills-analysis/184124/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":63,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":64,"interactionStatistic":65},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-04","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":66,"interactionType":67,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":68},"ViewAction",{"@type":70,"mainEntity":71},"FAQPage",[72,78,82],{"name":73,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":75},"What were the main findings regarding speaking skill improvement in the experimental group?","Question",{"text":76,"@type":77},"The experimental group showed statistically significant improvements in speaking skills across pre-test, post-test, and attainment tests, with p-values of 0.03, 0.00, and 0.00 respectively.","Answer",{"name":79,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":80},"How did the control group's speaking skills compare to the experimental group?",{"text":81,"@type":77},"The control group showed less significant improvements compared to the experimental group, particularly in the post-test (p=0.03) and attainment test (p=0.11), indicating a smaller impact of any non-experimental factors.",{"name":83,"@type":74,"acceptedAnswer":84},"What categories were used to analyze speaking skills, and what examples of metaphors were provided?",{"text":85,"@type":77},"Speaking skills were categorized into Improvement, Synchronization, Extraction, Modification, and Practicing. Metaphors included 'Meal', 'Bridge', 'Play' for improvement, and 'Statue', 'Labyrinth', 'Chess' for synchronization.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":88,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":90,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":93},[94,98,102,106,111,116,121,124,129,132,136],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":47,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":99,"show_sort_weight":100,"slug":101},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":113,"show_sort_weight":114,"slug":115},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":118,"show_sort_weight":119,"slug":120},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":123},30,"research-report",{"id":125,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":126,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":128},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":130,"show_sort_weight":127,"slug":131},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":133,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":134,"show_sort_weight":133,"slug":135},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":137,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":138,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":139},19,"General","general"]