[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-587033-105":59,"doc-detail-587033-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","social-housing-goals-in-state-housing-allocation-plans-a-50-state-survey","Social Housing Goals in State Housing Allocation Plans - A 50-State Survey","","A 50-state survey analyzes how states use flexibility in allocating major federal housing programs to advance social housing goals. Focusing on LIHTC, NHTF/HTF, and HOME, the report identifies trends such as incentives for long-term affordability, nonprofit ownership or management, tenant protections, and limits on displacement and rent increases. It also highlights policy mechanisms including tenant opportunity to purchase, tenant organizing support, cooperative models, and community land trusts, and emphasizes advocacy within state executive processes.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/social-housing-goals-in-state-housing-allocation-plans-a-50-state-survey/587033/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/social-housing-goals-in-state-housing-allocation-plans-a-50-state-survey/587033.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Fahsai","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What social housing goals does the report examine in state housing allocation plans?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It examines how states steer federal programs toward a social housing ideal, including permanent affordability, community or nonprofit ownership, and resident-centered governance and protections.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which federal housing programs are analyzed?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The report examines flexibility in the allocation of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF/HTF), and the federal HOME program (HOME).",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What kinds of provisions are most common in the surveyed state allocation plans?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Common features include incentives for long-term affordability and nonprofit ownership, protections related to “right of first refusal,” enhanced just-cause eviction definitions, limits on excessive rent increases, displacement-related limits, and provisions encouraging tenant opportunity to purchase.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},587033,1792188841,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":46,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":31,"preview_page_count":4},549768702563,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/8000c4aa63b76e948b?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786536092046926083","Social Housing Goals in State Housing Allocation Plans  \nA 50-State Survey  \nBy Robert Lindsay, Janelle Taylor, and Philip Tegeler  \nAbout the Authors and Acknowledgments  \nRobert Lindsay, J.D. University of Minnesota Law School 2023, was a Law & Policy Intern at PRRAC in 2022-2023; Janelle Taylor, J.D. Georgetown Law School 2023, was also a Law & Policy Intern at PRRAC in 2022-2023; Philip Tegeler is the Executive Director of PRRAC.  \nThanks to Barbara Samuels for her helpful comments on an earlier draft, and thanks to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative for supporting this research. Thanks also to Tessa Delgo for her helpful editorial assistance.  \n1  \nA. INTRODUCTION  \nOur federal housing policy continues to rely heavily on the private market and the immense capital at its disposal for the production of low income housing. But among government housing officials and across the broad network of non-profit housing professionals in the U.S., the belief in a “right to housing”is strong, along with a vision of housing that is community-owned and controlled, permanently affordable, and resident-centered. This social housing ideal is difficult to achieve at scale without direct public subsidy.  \nPRRAC’s prior report on social housing goals in  \nConsistent with the basic principles of social housing, as recently summarized by the Alliance for Housing Justice,2 we looked for the following types of provisions in state allocation plans:  \nn Incentives or requirements for long-term affordability above the statutory minimum  \nn Non-profit ownership or management of housing above the statutory minimum  \nn Provisions promoting tenant or community acquisition of rental housing above the statutory minimum  \nHUD programs1 suggested ways that federal legisla-  \ntion and regulatory provisions might be adjusted to divert more public funding to support social housing development and social  \nhousing goals. This report, in contrast, examines the flexibility given to states in their allocation of three major federal programs – the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF or HTF), and the federal HOME program (HOME)– and finds a strong developing trend among state governments to steer these programs at least partly in the direction of the social housing ideal. The flexibility available to  \nThe flexibility available to state governments in these plans highlights the value of organizing and advocacy, particularly at the state executive branch level, to expand tenant protections, establish permanent affordability, and promote community, nonprofit and resident ownership.  \nstate governments in these plans highlights the value  \nn Tenant protections, including just-cause eviction policies above the statutory minimum, rent increase protections, and protection from displacement  \nn Democratic resident control over housing resources, partnership with communitybased organizations, or other community oversight or tenant input in housing policy  \nn Tenant cooperative models / provisions promoting community living opportunities; limited equity coop or other tenant ownership  \nof organizing and advocacy, particularly at the state executive branch level, to expand tenant protections, establish permanent affordability, and promote community, nonprofit and resident ownership.  \nn Community land trusts or similar provisions  \nn Support for tenant organizing and/or engagement  \n1 What Can HUD Do to Expand Public and Community Ownership of Rental Housing? (PRRAC, April 2021) .  \n2 See What is Social Housing? Basic Principles for the U.S., [https://www.allianceforhousingjustice.org/us-social-housing](https://www.allianceforhousingjustice.org/us-social-housing)principles.  \nSocial Housing Goals in State Housing Allocation Plans-a 50-State Survey   \n2  \nWe found that the most common “social housing”features of these state allocation plans included incentives for long-term or permanent affordability (above the statutory minimum), non-profit","cbCaihfa6gDQyYcv","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihfa6gDQyYcv","pdf",1605779,"English","# A. INTRODUCTION\n## Social housing principles and provisions sought in state plans\n## Federal program flexibility and trends toward the social housing ideal\n## Overview of common and notable state allocation features\n## LIHTC QAPs and state planning cycle","[{\"question\":\"What social housing goals does the report examine in state housing allocation plans?\",\"answer\":\"It examines how states steer federal programs toward a social housing ideal, including permanent affordability, community or nonprofit ownership, and resident-centered governance and protections.\"},{\"question\":\"Which federal housing programs are analyzed?\",\"answer\":\"The report examines flexibility in the allocation of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF/HTF), and the federal HOME program (HOME).\"},{\"question\":\"What kinds of provisions are most common in the surveyed state allocation plans?\",\"answer\":\"Common features include incentives for long-term affordability and nonprofit ownership, protections related to “right of first refusal,” enhanced just-cause eviction definitions, limits on excessive rent increases, displacement-related limits, and provisions encouraging tenant opportunity to purchase.\"}]","Social Housing Goals in State Housing Allocation Plans - A 50-State Survey | PDF",1792060498]