[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-426759-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-426759-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","slang-exploring-and-mocking-slang-terms-by-decade","Slang - Exploring and Mocking Slang Terms by Decade","","Slang is presented as a socially charged, ever-changing speech style lacking a single universally accepted definition. The text argues that slang often “lowers the register” of speech while signaling in-group versus out-group belonging, and it challenges dismissive, snobbish academic framing. It further claims slang reflects language’s fluid evolution and that “cultural appropriation” has no direct analogue in language, where linguistic uniqueness strengthens collective expression. It then lists slang examples from the 1920s onward through the 2010s, with brief meanings.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/lifestyle/","Lifestyle",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/slang-exploring-and-mocking-slang-terms-by-decade/426759/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/slang-exploring-and-mocking-slang-terms-by-decade/426759.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"A glass of water","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"Why does the document say there is no single solid definition of slang?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"It notes that multiple definitions repeatedly emphasize disagreement over a universally agreed meaning. What scholars do tend to agree on is slang’s effect on the formality or “register” of speech.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What purposes does the document claim slang serves in social interaction?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"Slang is described as reinforcing in-group/out-group bias by marking belonging or exclusion. It should be used to draw in like-minded people.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How does the document relate slang to language evolution and cultural uniqueness?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"It argues that slang highlights language as a fluid, evolving construct. It also contends that language does not have the same “cultural appropriation” problem as the arts, because staying relevant means adding one’s own cultural and linguistic uniqueness.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},426759,1791718304,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,115,120,123,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":125},10,"lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":124,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},962090760832,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Slang. A word I first came into contact with when I was 6 or 7, due in no small part to my parents allowing me to watch Robin Williams: An Evening At the Met and Eddie Murphy's \"Delirious\" and \"Raw\" with them.  \nI had so many questions.  \n*Read Wiki definition of Slang*  \nDuring my research for this episode I ran across a number of definitions of slang, but the one thing continuously, and humorously repeated IN these definitions is that there isn't really one, solid and agreed upon definition. What every one of the learned scholars (or bored wikipedophiles) which tackled the subject agreed upon, however, was that it\"lowers the 'register' or 'formality/respectability' of speech\" and is designed to highlight one's belonging to or NOT belonging to a given sub-culture or minority group.  \n*Read Encyclopedia Britannica racist snobby bit*  \nI found this highfalutin snobbery sus AF. Sure, when Scholastics hid knowledge behind a dead-esque language for centuries (I refer of course to \"the language of scholarship\"being latin until fairly recently), it was merely the privilege of the intelligentsia, but when minority groups and sub-cultures exclude THEM, it's a lowbrow mockery of linguistics.  \nClearly, I have opinions.  \nOn the other hand, if someone was trying to write a Ph.D. dissertation on possible alcoholic allergic responses to different types of hard liquor, and after 15 pages of mind numbing academic droning came out with a sentence like \"By that time those fools were krunk AF!\" ...well...I kinda get what the scholastics are talking about.  \nSlang, much like academic prose, serves to reinforce the \"In-Group/Out-Group Bias\"inherent in all human interaction, and as such should be used only as a means to draw in like minded folk.  \nPut another way: Know yer role and stay in your lane.  \nSlang does do two things EXCEPTIONALLY, however:  \n1) It highlights that human language is an ever evolving, fluid construct which benefits from both its more rigid, straight-laced users and its more artistic, freestyle users.  \n*Read the bit about Serendipity, spurious, and strenuous*  \n*Read the bit about \"Gig\" and \"Lit\"*  \n2) It reminds us that \"cultural appropriation\" does not exist in language. In the arts? Certainly a possibility (Elvis, I'm lookin' at you) . But, in language the only way to stay  \nrelevant is to add your cultural and linguistic uniqueness to the collective. Resistance is futile.  \nIndeed, if history has taught us anything, it is that the more we offer up of ourselves and mix together, the stronger and more beautiful we become.  \nBut, enough about the academic, thinkity side of this shit...let's explore and mock slang of the past and present!  \n1: 1920s Slang Terms  \n1. 23 skiddoo--to get going; move along; leave; or scram  \n2. The cat's pajamas--the best; the height of excellence  \n3. Gams--legs  \n4. The real McCoy--sincere; genuine; the real thing  \n5. Hotsy-totsy--perfect  \n6. Moll--a female companion of a gangster  \n7. Speakeasy--a place where alcohol was illegally sold and drunk during Prohibition  \n8. The bee's knees--excellent; outstanding  \n2: 1930s Slang Terms  \n1. I'll be a monkey's uncle--sign of disbelief; I don't believe it!  \n2. Gig--a job  \n3. Girl Friday--a secretary or female assistant  \n4. Juke joint--a casual and inexpensive establishment with drinking, dancing, and blues music, typically in the southeastern United States  \n5. Skivvies--men's underwear  \n3: 1940s Slang Terms  \n1. Blockbuster--a huge success  \n2. Keeping up with the Joneses--competing to have a lifestyle or socioeconomic status comparable to one's neighbors  \n3. Cool--excellent; clever; sophisticated; fashionable; or enjoyable  \n4. Sitting in the hot seat-- in a highly uncomfortable or embarrassing situation  \n5. Smooch--kiss  \n4: 1950s Slang Terms  \n1. Big brother is watching you--someone of authority is monitoring your actions  \n2. Boo-boo--a mistake; a wound  \n3. Hi-fi--high fidelity; a record player or turntable  \n4. Hipster--an innovati","cbCaiapEH2iAZHOb","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiapEH2iAZHOb","pdf",239115,14,"English","# Slang: Origins and Definition\n## Register, identity, and snobbery\n## In-group/out-group bias and appropriate use\n## How slang evolves language\n## Slang and cultural uniqueness\n# Slang Terms by Decade\n## 1920s slang terms\n## 1930s slang terms\n## 1940s slang terms\n## 1950s slang terms\n## 1960s slang terms\n## 1970s slang terms\n## 1980s slang terms\n## 1990s slang terms\n## 2000s slang terms\n## 2010s slang term","[{\"question\":\"Why does the document say there is no single solid definition of slang?\",\"answer\":\"It notes that multiple definitions repeatedly emphasize disagreement over a universally agreed meaning. What scholars do tend to agree on is slang’s effect on the formality or “register” of speech.\"},{\"question\":\"What purposes does the document claim slang serves in social interaction?\",\"answer\":\"Slang is described as reinforcing in-group/out-group bias by marking belonging or exclusion. It should be used to draw in like-minded people.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document relate slang to language evolution and cultural uniqueness?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that slang highlights language as a fluid, evolving construct. It also contends that language does not have the same “cultural appropriation” problem as the arts, because staying relevant means adding one’s own cultural and linguistic uniqueness.\"}]","Slang - Exploring and Mocking Slang Terms by Decade | PDF",1790641709,22]