[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-112813-en":3,"doc-seo-112813-105":29,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":95},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},112813,1374391974468,"Eden","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0",8,"Research & Report","Senegal Completion and Learning Review (CLR) - Independent Evaluation Group Review","Independent Evaluation Group Review of Senegal’s World Bank Group Completion and Learning Review (CLR) for FY13–FY17. The review covers the Senegal Country Partnership Strategy (CPS), synthesizing inputs from the original CPS and related performance and learning materials. Development outcome is rated Moderately Unsatisfactory, while WBG performance is rated Good. Key issues include weaknesses in the results framework, indicator design, and limited or no progress across several objectives. The CLR presents lessons on flexible designs, safeguards, and balanced DPO goals.","Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized  \nFor Official Use Only  \nCLR Review  \nIndependent Evaluation Group  \n\n| 1. CAS/CPS Data |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Country: Senegal |  |  |  |\n| CAS/CPS Year: FY 13 |  | CAS/CPS Period: FY 13-FY17 |  |\n| CLR Period: FY 13-FY17 |  | Date of this review: February 24, 2020 |  |\n| 2. Ratings |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n|  | CLR Rating |  | IEG Rating |\n| Development Outcome: | Moderately Satisfactory |  | Moderately Unsatisfactory |\n| WBG Performance: | Good |  | Good |\n|  |  |  |  |\n| 3. Executive Summary |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |\n| i. This review of the World Bank Group’s Completion and Learning Review (CLR) covers the Senegal Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) for the 5-year period FY13 through FY17 . It is based on the original CPS, the Performance and Learning Review (PLR) dated April 28, 2015 , and the CLR dated December 17, 2019.\u003Cbr>ii. Senegal is a lower middle-income country with a Gross National Income per capita of US$1 ,410 in 2018. It has a population of 16.3 million (2019) . Senegal was among the fastest growing economies in Africa over the 2013-2017 period, with real GDP growth averaging 5.8% per year compared with 2.4% annual growth in the 2008-2012 period, with lower growth being primarily the result of the economy contracting by 8. 1% in 2011 as a result of a severe drought. Services and exports were its main drivers of growth, although all sectors contributed to growth over the CPS timeframe. In spite of the rapid growth, GNI per capita in US dollar terms was lower (US$1280) in 2017 than in 2013 (US$1360) , because of a sharp depreciation of the CFA franc. Senegal's human development index stood at 0.505 in 2017 which puts it in the low human development category, standing at 164 out of 189 countries. Its Gini coefficient was 40.3 in 2011.1 iii. The CPS for FY13-FY17 supported the strategy of the Government based on three pillars:(i) an overarching or Foundation Pillar focused on strengthening the governance framework and building resilience, (ii) Pillar I focused on accelerating inclusive growth that would create employment, primarily through promoting private sector development, and (iii) Pillar II that focused on improving the delivery of government services particularly those relating to education, health, and social protection. These were in line with both World Bank Group and Senegal development objectives at inception, the former being to end extreme poverty and to promote shared prosperity and the latter being an accelerated growth path that will lead to higher, stable and shared growth over the medium to long term to address the development challenges associated with low incomesand opportunities, in particular the need to address employment creation and the high poverty rate, particularly in rural areas.\u003Cbr>iv. At the beginning of the CPS period, IBRD lending commitments were US$625 .5 million. The CPS envisaged new IDA lending of US$1,139 .5 million. Total commitments made during the |  |  |  |\n\n1 No poverty data is available after 2011.  \n\n| CPS period amounted to $1,466 million. The number of projects increased from 13 at the beginning of the CPS period to 18 at the end. Development policy lending amounted to US$135 million. IFC commitments amounted to US$96 million in 16 investments.\u003Cbr>v. IEG rates the CPS development outcome as Moderately Unsatisfactory. Under the Foundation Pillar, which had four development objectives, good progress was achieved on drainage and flood prevention, limited progress was made on income generation opportunities in Casamance and public sector accountability, and there was no progress on sustainable land and water management. The overall rating for the Pillar is Moderately Unsatisfactory. Under Pillar I, which had seven development objectives , good progress was made on urban and inter-urban transportation, and electrification ; some progress was made on agricultural productivity and marketing; limited p","cbCaidEndYi0qxSi","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidEndYi0qxSi","pdf",1592104,1,45,"English","en",105,"# Executive Summary\n## Review scope and sources\n## Ratings and outcomes\n## Pillar-by-pillar progress assessment\n## Lessons and implications","[{\"question\":\"What period does the Senegal CLR review cover, and what sources does it use?\",\"answer\":\"The review covers the CPS period FY13–FY17 and is based on the original CPS, the April 28, 2015 Performance and Learning Review, and the December 17, 2019 CLR.\"},{\"question\":\"How are development outcome and WBG performance rated in this review?\",\"answer\":\"IEG rates the CPS development outcome as Moderately Unsatisfactory, while WBG performance under the CPS is rated Good.\"},{\"question\":\"What are the main weaknesses identified in results and indicators?\",\"answer\":\"The review highlights significant weaknesses in the results framework due to too many objectives and poor design of many indicators.\"},{\"question\":\"What key lessons does IEG extract from the CLR?\",\"answer\":\"IEG emphasizes simple flexible project design with realistic timeframes, making safeguard issues central to implementation, and ensuring DPO design balances realistic reforms with a small set of critical objectives.\"}]",1784497339,113,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":33,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":90,"head_meta":92,"extra_data":94,"updated_unix":27},"senegal-completion-and-learning-review-clr-independent-evaluation-group-review","",{"@graph":35,"@context":89},[36,53,68],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,47,50],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":48,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":49},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":51,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":52},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/senegal-completion-and-learning-review-clr-independent-evaluation-group-review/112813/",4,{"url":51,"name":13,"@type":54,"author":55,"headline":13,"publisher":57,"fileFormat":60,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":61,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":60,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":56},"Person",{"url":40,"name":58,"@type":59},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-20","2026-07-19",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81,85],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What period does the Senegal CLR review cover, and what sources does it use?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"The review covers the CPS period FY13–FY17 and is based on the original CPS, the April 28, 2015 Performance and Learning Review, and the December 17, 2019 CLR.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"How are development outcome and WBG performance rated in this review?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"IEG rates the CPS development outcome as Moderately Unsatisfactory, while WBG performance under the CPS is rated Good.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"What are the main weaknesses identified in results and indicators?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"The review highlights significant weaknesses in the results framework due to too many objectives and poor design of many indicators.",{"name":86,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":87},"What key lessons does IEG extract from the CLR?",{"text":88,"@type":76},"IEG emphasizes simple flexible project design with realistic timeframes, making safeguard issues central to implementation, and ensuring DPO design balances realistic reforms with a small set of critical objectives.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":51,"og:type":91,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":58,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":93,"canonical":51},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":96},[97,101,105,109,114,119,124,127,132,135,139],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":120,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":122,"slug":123},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":125,"slug":126},30,"research-report",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":130,"slug":131},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":130,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":130,"slug":134},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":136,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":137,"show_sort_weight":136,"slug":138},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":140,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":141,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":142},19,"General","general"]