[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-182781-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":73,"doc-detail-182781-en":123},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":66,"head_meta":68,"extra_data":70,"updated_unix":72},105,"en","selection-tool-and-dropout-effect-sizes-supplemental-materials","Selection tool and dropout effect sizes - Supplemental materials","","Supplementary materials summarize selection tools and their estimated effect sizes on dropout and related outcomes. Tables list tool examples such as prior academic achievement, aptitude testing, MMI, panel interviews, situational judgement tests, and personality testing, alongside confidence intervals and study counts. Additional rows compare end-of-program effects and early-program academic results, and include OSCE/OSLER/clinical exams. The document also groups selection tools by domain (academic achievement, aptitude tests, reasoning types, interviews, MMI, panel, situational judgement, and personality tests).",{"@graph":14,"@context":65},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/selection-tool-and-dropout-effect-sizes-supplemental-materials/182781/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/selection-tool-and-dropout-effect-sizes-supplemental-materials/182781.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Finn","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",16,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"How are selection tools grouped conceptually?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Selection tools are grouped into domains such as academic achievement, aptitude tests (with subtypes like abstract and verbal reasoning), interview formats (including MMI and panel), situational judgement tests, and personality tests.","Answer","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":67,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":69,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":71,"site_id":7},182781,1788349965,{"code":4,"msg":74,"data":75},"success",[76,80,84,88,93,98,103,107,112,115,119],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":77,"show_sort_weight":78,"slug":79},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":81,"show_sort_weight":82,"slug":83},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":89,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":90,"show_sort_weight":91,"slug":92},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":94,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":95,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":97},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":99,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":100,"show_sort_weight":101,"slug":102},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":104,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":105,"slug":106},8,30,"research-report",{"id":108,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":109,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":111},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":113,"show_sort_weight":110,"slug":114},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":118},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":120,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":122},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":74,"data":124},{"doc_id":71,"user_id":125,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":126,"doc_module":4,"category_id":104,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":127,"file_id":128,"file_url":129,"file_type":130,"file_size":131,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":116,"language":132,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":133,"faqs":134,"seo_title":135,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":72,"read_time":136,"preview_page_count":4},34359740700684,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/1f400023980c374ae676?_k=1777273430885731487","| Selection tool | Example selection tool | Articles | Effect sizes |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Prior academic achievement | High school grade point average; Australian Tertiary Admission Rank | 47 | 94 |\n| Aptitude testing | UK Clinical Aptitude Test overall |  27  |  97  |\n| MMI | MMI | 9 | 12 |\n| Panel interview | Semi-structured interview | 12 | 20 |\n| Situational judgement test | Computer-based Assessment for Sampling Personal characteristics | 3 | 10 |\n| Personality testing | Personality Qualities Assessment | 3 | 3 |\n\n| Dropout |  | 0.205 (-0. 604 to 0. 540) [3 (3)] |  | 0.425 ( -0.307 to 1. 157) [4 (4)] | NilES | NilES | NilES | NilES |  | -0.0 14 (0.360 to 0.71 8 [1(1)] | 0.459 (0.235 to 0. 683) [ 1 (1)] | NilES |  | NilES | NilES |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  | End of program | 0.619 (0.509 to 0.728) [34 (20)] |  | 0.371 (0.219 to 0.522) [13 (11)] | 0.211 (0.001 to 0.421) [6 (6)] | 0.053 (-0. 127 to 0.232) [2 (2)] | 0.305 (0. 121 to 0.49) [3 (3)] | 0. 192 (-0.32 1 to 0. 706) [3 (3)] |  | 0.229 (0. 08 1 to 0.377) [ 1 (1)] | 0.135 ( -0.282 to 0.552) [5 (5)] | 0.2 13 (0. 044 to 0.228) [2 (2)] |  | NilES | NilES |\n| Academic results Early program |  | 0.697 (0.501 to 0.893) [40 (29)] |  | 0.550 (0.334 to 0.766) [20 (16)] | 0.167 ( -0.218 to 0.552) [8 (6)] | 0.276 ( -0. 144 to 0.365) [ 7 (5)] | 0.704 (0.426 to 0.983) [4 (3)] | 0.643 (0.25 to 1.036) [4 (3)] |  | 0.195 ( -0.203 to 0.594) [4 (3)] | 0.121 ( -0.759 to 1) [6 (6)] | 0.17 ( -0. 164 to 0.227) [8 (2)] |  | NilES | 0. 13 1 (-0. 067 to 0.329) [ 1 (1)] |\n|  | End of program | 0.545 (0. 125 to 0.965) [8 (7)] |  | 0.448 ( -0. 192 to 1.089) [6 (5)] | 0.128 ( -0.052 to 0.309) [4 (4)] | 0.473 (0. 1 72 to 0. 773) [ 1 (1)] | 0.298 ( -0.24 to 0.837) [4 (4)] | 0.216 ( -0.313 to 0.745) [3 (3)] |  | NilES | 0.372 ( -0.454 to 1. 197) [5 (4)] | NilES |  | 0. 1 72 (-0. 002 to 0.345) [ 1 (1)] | NilES |\n| OSCE/OS LER/c l inica l exams | Early program | 0.238 ( -0. 106 to 0.582) [9 (9)] |  | 0.106 ( -0.401 to 0.612) [6 (5)] | NilES | NilES | NilES | NilES |  | 0.417 ( -0.087 to 0.921) [6 (5)] | 0.091 ( -0.576 to 0.759) [3 (3)] | NilES |  | 0.004 (-0. 104 to 0. 1 12) [ 1 (1)] | NilES |\n| Se lection tools |  | Academic achievement | Aptitude tests | Overall | Abstract reasoning | Interpersona l reasoning | Verbal reasoning | Quantitative reasoning | Interviews | MMI | Panel | Situational judgement tests | Persona l ity tests | PQA | MMPI |","cbCaift7WuqLYLAJ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaift7WuqLYLAJ","pdf",913823,"English","# Selection tools\n## Examples and domains\n## Effect sizes and dropout\n## End-of-program and early-program outcomes\n## OSCE/clinical exams","[{\"question\":\"How are selection tools grouped conceptually?\",\"answer\":\"Selection tools are grouped into domains such as academic achievement, aptitude tests (with subtypes like abstract and verbal reasoning), interview formats (including MMI and panel), situational judgement tests, and personality tests.\"}]","Selection tool and dropout effect sizes - Supplemental materials | PDF",25]