[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-326150-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-326150-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","secular-education-in-the-light-of-religious-principles-volume-6-issue-2-second-quarter-1955","SECULAR EDUCATION IN THE LIGHT OF RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES - Volume 6 - Issue 2 - Second Quarter 1955","","A review issue examines the tension between secular education and religious principles, using campus events and editorial arguments to critique the “organizational mentality” and defend the value of open intellectual exchange. It discusses controversies over prescribed texts and academic freedom, contrasts liberal public rhetoric with private practices, and highlights seminar models that foster rigorous questioning. The issue also critiques trends toward planned mediocrity and reviews the integration of psychoanalysis and religion.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/secular-education-in-the-light-of-religious-principles-volume-6-issue-2-second-quarter-1955/326150/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/secular-education-in-the-light-of-religious-principles-volume-6-issue-2-second-quarter-1955/326150.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Valentina","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What controversy does the issue describe regarding academic freedom and course texts?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It recounts campus reaction to a critical article and states that people involved in Inter-department Course 491 presented a defense of their chosen text to the university president’s office.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How does the editorial characterize liberalism and its public stance?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It argues that liberal protests can be a bluff and that liberals may be afraid of public discussion, despite insisting the university is a place of free discussion and academic freedom.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Why does the issue consider the Wayne Spring Seminar Weekend valuable for students?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It says the seminar forces specialists to explain their expertise to diverse questioning peers and notes that limited attendance increases attention to each attending student.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},326150,1790206601,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":145,"read_time":146,"preview_page_count":4},13056703020460,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253dac470eee5d?_k=1778207105932848923","# SECULAR EDUCATIONIN THE LIGHT0F RELIGIOUSPRINCIPLES\n\nVOLUME 6NUMBER 2SECOND QUARTER1955  \n# Jhe Heart of L\n\nLoneliness is a woman  \nsitting on the steps of her heart  \nwaiting for her lover.  \nLoneliness is a single bird  \nsinging the sun to rest,  \nwhile night,creeps up behind  \nlike a cat.  \nLoneliness is a soul turned from God,  \nand laughing aloud  \nto forget the madness  \nof the day.  \nBety Ford  \nEditorRev.James J.Maguire,C.S.P.,Ph.D.  \nThe  \nAssociate Editors  \nRev.Charles W.Albright,C.S.P.Glen IrvingThecla_SosnowskiBetty Ford  \n# NEWMANREVIEW\n\nContributing EditorsJohn A.StarrsJames A.MarkleSamuel J.TorinaMargaret Brogley  \nThe NEWMAN REVIEW is published by the Cardinal Newman Foundation,4821 SecondBoulevard,Detroit 1,Michigan—TEmple 1-1572.  \n## PERSPECTIVES\n\nIN  \nREVIEW  \nTHE CONSERVATIVE,ORGANIZATIONAL MENTALITY  \nIn our last issue we published a critical article entitled\"Public Funds for Doctrinaire Atheism.\"Elsewhere in this issuewe have described part of the campus reaction to frank criticism,stressing in particular the sociological implications of the bizarrecharge that our article constituted a threat to academic freedom.  \nNow,as we go to press,we hear that the people involved inInter-department Course 491 have presented some sort of brief,defending their choice of text,to the office of the President ofthe University.  \nThe amazing thing about all of this is the private,hush-hushmanner.One can understand the conservative mind and theorganizational mentality,but intellectual liberals are supposedto be free of such failings.Our liberal friends insist repeatedlythat the university is a place of free discussion.Presumably thisis what they mean by academic freedom.They like to speakof freedom from dogmatism,pre-conceived ideas and sectarianbias.The University must be a meeting place for the freeconflict of ideas,etc.,etc.,etc.  \nThis is the standard liberal line.We have been hearing itregularly for years.This is supposed to be the great advantagewhich the secular school enjoys over the “sectarian”college.Tous,each year makes it increasingly apparent that it is,in mostcases,nothing but a line.This terminology is not very academic.We have expressed this reflection in the proper academic phrase-ology in past articles in this Review,but this time we shall notmince words.We are gradually coming to the conviction thatmost of the vociferous liberal protestation is nothing but a bluffand that our liberal friends are in fact afraid of public discussions.It requires no particular courage to be a lion in the privacy ofone's classroom or even in inter-office memoranda.Have thechampions of secular liberalism grown soft in their vested interests?  \n## SINCERITY OF LIBERALISM\n\nStrange as it may seem,the very fact that we write sovehemently shows that we do have a basic faith in the integrityand mental honesty of the liberal mind.We think that liberalsneed to be jarred out of their complacency and we do believe thatthey are genuine enough to be jarred.Actually there is a goodlyminority who do demonstrate the sincerity of their liberalism byinviting campus religious directors to their classrooms to presentthe“other side”of disputed questions.There are many who feelthat outspoken criticism from such outside sources as religiousdirectors is necessary for the vitality of university life.In writ-ing as we do we are staking everything on the conviction thatwhen the chips are down,the majority of the faculty reallybelieve that intellectual exchange,however violent,is a good thing.  \n## THE SEMINAR WEEKEND\n\nWayne Spring Seminar Weekend was,incidentally,a goodexample of liberal discussion.The participating faculty of six-teen was selected by a Student Council Committee and includedthe directors of both the Hillel and Newman Foundations.Thelarge divergence of background made the seminars tremendouslystimulating.Specialists were forced to explain their specialtiesnot to their own confreres nor to a public that would need watereddown doctrin","cbCaidP0DJZZKEx6","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidP0DJZZKEx6","pdf",1193580,28,"English","# PERSPECTIVES\n## IN REVIEW\n## SINCERITY OF LIBERALISM\n## THE SEMINAR WEEKEND\n## PLANNED MEDIOCRITY\n## DR. STERN AND \"CONTACT\"","[{\"question\":\"What controversy does the issue describe regarding academic freedom and course texts?\",\"answer\":\"It recounts campus reaction to a critical article and states that people involved in Inter-department Course 491 presented a defense of their chosen text to the university president’s office.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the editorial characterize liberalism and its public stance?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that liberal protests can be a bluff and that liberals may be afraid of public discussion, despite insisting the university is a place of free discussion and academic freedom.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the issue consider the Wayne Spring Seminar Weekend valuable for students?\",\"answer\":\"It says the seminar forces specialists to explain their expertise to diverse questioning peers and notes that limited attendance increases attention to each attending student.\"}]","SECULAR EDUCATION IN THE LIGHT OF RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES - Volume 6 - Issue 2 - Second Quarter 1955 | PDF",1789972362,71]