[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-473645-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-473645-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","second-language-skills-for-all-analyzing-a-proposed-language-requirement-for-us-air-force-officers","Second-Language Skills for All? - Analyzing a Proposed Language Requirement for U.S. Air Force Officers","","Many federal entities, including Congress and the Department of Defense, are concerned about armed forces language capabilities. This report presents findings from a study of U.S. Air Force officers in response to a proposal to require commissioning officers to achieve a high level of proficiency in a language other than English. The research evaluates feasibility and assesses likely consequences of implementing such a language requirement for officers.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/second-language-skills-for-all-analyzing-a-proposed-language-requirement-for-us-air-force-officers/473645/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/second-language-skills-for-all-analyzing-a-proposed-language-requirement-for-us-air-force-officers/473645.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Cipher","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-02","2026-09-30",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":22},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What issue does the report address?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The report addresses concerns about language capabilities in the armed forces and proposes assessing a requirement for officers to attain high proficiency in a language other than English.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What two main questions does the research evaluate?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"It asks whether it is feasible to require all new Air Force officers to demonstrate high second-language proficiency upon commissioning and what consequences would follow from implementing the requirement.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"Who sponsored and supported the study described in the report?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"The research was sponsored by the Foreign Policy Advisor to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and conducted within RAND Project AIR FORCE under a fiscal year 2009–2010 study on developing officer language proficiency.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},473645,1790935476,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":22,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},687208528416,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  \nEDUCATION AND THE ARTS  \nENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT  \nHEALTH AND HEALTH CARE  \nINFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORTATION  \nINTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS  \nLAW AND BUSINESS  \nNATIONAL SECURITY  \nPOPULATION AND AGING  \nPUBLIC SAFETY  \nSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY  \nTERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY  \nThe RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis.  \nThis electronic document was made available from [www.rand.org](www.rand.org) as a public service of the RAND Corporation.  \nSkip all front matter: Jump to Page 1 6  \nSupport RAND  \nPurchase this document  \nBrowse Reports & Bookstore  \nMake a charitable contribution  \nFor More Information [Visit RAND at](Visit RAND at www.rand.org)[ ](Visit RAND at www.rand.org)[www.rand.org](Visit RAND at www.rand.org)[ ](Visit RAND at www.rand.org)Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details  \nLimited Electronic Distribution Rights  \nThis document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions.  \nThis product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. Reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.  \nREPORT  \nSecond-Language Skills for All?  \nAnalyzing a Proposed Language Requirement for U.S. Air Force Officers  \nChaitra M. Hardison • Louis W. Miller • Jennifer J. Li • Amber N. Schroeder • Susan Burkhauser • Sean Robson • Deborah Lai  \nPrepared for the United States Air Force  \nApproved for public release; distribution unlimited  \n PROJECT AIR FORCE  \nThe research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract FA7014-06-C-0001. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF.  \nLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data  \nSecond language skills for all? : analyzing a proposed language requirement for U.S. Air Force officers /  \nChaitra M. Hardison ... [et al.].  \n[p. cm](p. cm).  \nIncludes bibliographical references.  \nISBN 978-0-8330-6034-1 (pbk. : alk. paper)  \n1. United States. Air Force—Officers—Training of. 2. Second language acquisition—United States. 3.  \nCommunicative competence—United States. I. Hardison, Chaitra M.  \nUG638 . S43 2012  \n358.4'161—dc23  \n2012041174  \nThe RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.  \nR® is a registered trademark.  \n© Copyright 2012 RAND Corporation  \nPermission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page ([http://www.rand.org/publications/](http://www.rand.org/publications/)[ ](http://www.rand.org/publications/)[permissions.html](permissions.html)).  \nPublished 2012 by","cbCaimmQkHsrChhs","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimmQkHsrChhs","pdf",3227397,174,"English","# Overview\n## Feasibility of a Second-Language Proficiency Requirement\n## Potential Consequences for Officers\n## Audience and Relevance","[{\"question\":\"What issue does the report address?\",\"answer\":\"The report addresses concerns about language capabilities in the armed forces and proposes assessing a requirement for officers to attain high proficiency in a language other than English.\"},{\"question\":\"What two main questions does the research evaluate?\",\"answer\":\"It asks whether it is feasible to require all new Air Force officers to demonstrate high second-language proficiency upon commissioning and what consequences would follow from implementing the requirement.\"},{\"question\":\"Who sponsored and supported the study described in the report?\",\"answer\":\"The research was sponsored by the Foreign Policy Advisor to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and conducted within RAND Project AIR FORCE under a fiscal year 2009–2010 study on developing officer language proficiency.\"}]","Second-Language Skills for All? - Analyzing a Proposed Language Requirement for U.S. Air Force Officers | PDF",1790782788,438]