[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-268826-105":59,"doc-detail-268826-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","sebt-vs-ybt-effectiveness-in-assessing-lower-extremity-functional-balance-in-individuals-with-lower-extremity-dysfunction-a-systematic-review","SEBT vs. YBT - Effectiveness in Assessing Lower Extremity Functional Balance in Individuals with Lower Extremity Dysfunction - A Systematic Review","","The systematic review evaluates which dynamic balance measure—Y-Balance Test (YBT) or Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT)—more effectively assesses lower extremity (LE) functional balance and clinically relevant injury risk. Searches were conducted from March 11 to August 30, 2016, using defined inclusion criteria. Extracted data covered dynamic balance performance in injured and non-injured individuals, comparisons between tests, and injury-risk predictors. Results indicate YBT is more time efficient, standardized, and highly reliable, with kinematic findings supporting superior dynamic stability evaluation.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/sebt-vs-ybt-effectiveness-in-assessing-lower-extremity-functional-balance-in-individuals-with-lower-extremity-dysfunction-a-systematic-review/268826/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/sebt-vs-ybt-effectiveness-in-assessing-lower-extremity-functional-balance-in-individuals-with-lower-extremity-dysfunction-a-systematic-review/268826.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aldword","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-11","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What question does the systematic review address about SEBT and YBT?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"Which balance measure (SEBT or YBT) is more clinically efficient for detecting performance deficits and assessing injury risks in individuals with lower extremity dysfunction.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How were studies selected in the review?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Computerized searches were conducted from March 11 to August 30, 2016, using specific inclusion criteria.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What did the review conclude about YBT versus SEBT for dynamic balance assessment?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"YBT showed advantages in time efficiency and standardization, demonstrated high interrater and intrarater reliability, and was found to challenge and evaluate dynamic stability better than SEBT.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},268826,1789437605,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":29,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},2336478940917,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","SEBT vs. YBT – Effectiveness in Assessing Lower Extremity Functional Balance in Individuals with Lower Extremity Dysfunction: A Systematic Review  \nErin Barrero, PT, DPT1  \nJohn Bonilla, DPT1  \nStephanie Lindsey, PT, DPT1 Arlene Shi, PT, DPT1  \nEmilee Sobucki, PT, DPT1  \nAimee B. Klein, PT, DPT, DSc, OCS1  \n1 University of South Florida, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tampa, FL  \nABSTRACT  \nBackground and Purpose: There is limited evidence that directly addresses which balance measure is more clinically efficient in detecting performance deficits and assessing injury risks in individuals with lower extremity (LE) dysfunction. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess whether the Y-Balance Test (YBT) or Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) was more effective in assessing LE functional balance. Methods: Computerized searches were executed from March 11 to August 30, 2016, with specific inclusion criteria. Specific data extracted included the dynamic balance assessments in individuals with or without injury, comparison of these measures, and predictors of athletic injury risk. Findings: The YBT is more time efficient, standardized, and exhibits high interrater and intrarater reliability. Interpretation of kinematic variables found the YBT to both challenge and evaluate dynamic stability better than the SEBT. Finally, the YBT’s elevated central footplate seems to simulate everyday situations of maintaining postural control on uneven surfaces. Clinical Relevance/Conclusion: The YBT is recommended for clinical use of dynamic balance assessment due to the benefits of a standardized approach, that it is clinician-friendly in terms of efficiency, and is more applicable in challenging postural stability in those with or without LE dysfunction.  \nKeyWords: lower extremity injuries, dynamic balance tests  \nINTRODUCTION  \nThe maintenance of lower extremity (LE) balance for activities of daily living, such as walking and stair climbing, is based on information received and integrated by the vestibular, visual, and somatosensory systems, as well as the sensorimotor integration pathway. This creates a response to control an individual’s center of gravity over their base of support.1-4 Balance and postural control impairments have been observed in athletic populations with LE musculoskeletal injury,  \nsuch as anterior cruciate ligament injury, ankle sprains, and patellofemoral pain. 1,3,5 Authors showed 73% of all athletes across 19 different sports had recurrent ankle sprainsand 59% of these athletes had significant residual symptoms resulting in performance impairments.6 During the retrieval of the somatosensory feedback, LE injuries can alter the proprioception and kinesthetic characteristics of the hip, knee, and ankle. This affects the motor response in postural/neuromuscular control during dynamic motionsand perturbations.7 Hence, evaluation of balance and postural control deficits after sport injuries has become essential to reduce risk of recurrent injury and develop appropriate plans of care. 1,5 Balance control involves a combination of stability and postural orientation to maintain a position in space, while moving in a controlled and coordinated fashion.2 Therefore, balance and dynamic postural control will be used interchangeably in this systematic review.  \nCurrently, there are a wide variety of balance assessment tools used to assess non-contact injury risk prevention and guide injury prevention programs.8 Such tools have been deemed useful as they are quick and easy to use and do not require a lot of equipment to implement. However, the subjectivity of the results, potential ceiling effects, and decreased responsiveness to measure small progress or deterioration in balance are limitations of these available tools.9 Many of the available dynamic balance assessment tools require the patient to perform a series of motions to detect any form of postural deficiency, eg, Drop Jump Test’s landing proto","cbCaicXpntjzBS8O","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicXpntjzBS8O","pdf",861164,"English","# Abstract\n## Background and Purpose\n## Methods\n## Findings\n## Clinical Relevance/Conclusion\n# Introduction\n## Balance and Postural Control in LE Dysfunction\n## Limitations of Existing Balance Assessment Tools\n## SEBT Overview\n## YBT Overview\n## Rationale for Comparing SEBT and YBT","[{\"question\":\"What question does the systematic review address about SEBT and YBT?\",\"answer\":\"Which balance measure (SEBT or YBT) is more clinically efficient for detecting performance deficits and assessing injury risks in individuals with lower extremity dysfunction.\"},{\"question\":\"How were studies selected in the review?\",\"answer\":\"Computerized searches were conducted from March 11 to August 30, 2016, using specific inclusion criteria.\"},{\"question\":\"What did the review conclude about YBT versus SEBT for dynamic balance assessment?\",\"answer\":\"YBT showed advantages in time efficiency and standardization, demonstrated high interrater and intrarater reliability, and was found to challenge and evaluate dynamic stability better than SEBT.\"}]","SEBT vs. YBT - Effectiveness in Assessing Lower Extremity Functional Balance in Individuals with Lower Extremity Dysfunction - A Systematic Review | PDF",15]