[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-500026-105":59,"doc-detail-500026-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","sb-948-arreguin-cosponsor-letter-of-support","SB 948 (Arreguín) - COSPONSOR Letter of Support","","Letter from the Consumer Protection Policy Center (CPPC) in support of California’s SB 948 (Arreguín) cosponsorship. CPPC describes the Firearm Safety Certificate (FSC) framework, current requirements, and key gaps for people bringing firearms into California. It argues SB 948 would extend FSC completion within 180 days and add live-fire training to improve safe handling, storage, transfer responsibilities, and suicide-prevention awareness. CPPC also links the proposal to Bruen’s narrow safety-course standards.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/sb-948-arreguin-cosponsor-letter-of-support/500026/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/sb-948-arreguin-cosponsor-letter-of-support/500026.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"WPS_1786070896","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-10","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is SB 948 (Arreguín) intended to do?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It would require people who bring firearms into California from outside the state to acquire a Firearm Safety Certificate within 180 days, including training that involves live-fire instruction.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What are the current FSC requirements under California law?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Current law generally requires FSCs for people acquiring firearms in California, with a DOJ written test and course warnings on safe storage, proper transfer, and suicide prevention. FSCs expire after five years.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"How does CPPC connect SB 948 to New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"CPPC argues SB 948 sets narrow, objective, and definite firearm safety-course standards that aim to ensure responsible, law-abiding carriage, aligning more closely with permitted requirements than broader “shall-issue” concerns.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},500026,1791710265,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":14,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":24,"preview_page_count":4},549768072016,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","June 24 , 2026  \nThe Honorable Nick Schultz  \nChair, Assembly Public Safety Committee  \n1020 N Street, Room 111  \nSacramento, CA 95814  \nRe: SB 948 (Arreguín) - COSPONSOR  \nDear Chair Schultz:  \nThe Consumer Protection Policy Center (CPPC) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, academic center of research, teaching, learning and advocacy in regulatory and public interest law based at the University of San Diego School of Law. CPPC is the proud cosponsor of SB 948 , which will better train and educate firearm owners on California’s gun violence prevention laws via Firearm Safety Certificates (FSCs) to reduce the amount of gun violence injuries within California communities.  \nFSCs were established so every firearm owner could understand and follow firearm safety practices, have basic familiarity with the operation and handling of their firearm, and be fully aware of the responsibility of firearm ownership. Current law requires any person who acquires a firearm to have an FSC, unless statutorily exempt from the FSC requirements. A person must pass a Department of Justice (DOJ) written test on firearm safety, administered by DOJ instructors (often located at firearm dealerships) . The FSC course also provides warning information regarding safe storage, proper transfer of firearm ownership, and suicide prevention. FSCs expire after five years of issuance.  \nCurrent law only requires new firearm owners that acquire a firearm within California to have an FSC. There is no requirement for persons who bring in firearms from out of state to complete the FSC requirements, nor renew the FSC after it expires five years from issuance. Further, the only current requirement to pass the FSC requirement is a multiple-choice test, with no practical component for new firearm owners.  \nSB 948 will require persons who bring in firearms outside of California to acquire a FSC within 180 days. In addition, this measure will ensure firearm owners are properly trained on how to use, handle, and store firearms with live-fire training. These new training requirements would ensure firearm owners are familiar with the operation of their firearm before the person uses the firearm in a real situation.  \nCPPC would also highlight that these requirements are in concurrence with the requirements under New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen. Under Bruen, narrow, objective, and definite standards for firearm safety courses are designed to ensure only that those bearing arms in the jurisdiction are, in fact, responsible and law-abiding. However, constitutional challenges to lengthy wait times in processing license applications or exorbitant fees can deny citizens their right to public carry. Since SB 948’s requirements are narrow, objective, and definite for a firearm safety course to ensure those bearing arms in California are responsible and law-abiding, SB 948 is more aligned with the permitted requirements under Bruen than other“shall-issue” concerns.  \nSB 948 will help create a more educated firearm owner population in California and reduce the unnecessary and unintentional firearm injuries the people of California suffer every day. For the above reasons, CPPC supports SB 948. Thank you for your continued leadership in shaping gun violence prevention policies.  \nSincerely,  \nMarcus Friedman  \nAdministrative Director  \nCenter for Public Interest Law  \nUniversity of San Diego School of Law","cbCaicvSFbiKpOuK","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicvSFbiKpOuK","pdf",170910,"English","# SB 948 Support Overview\n## Current FSC Requirements and Gaps\n## What SB 948 Would Change\n## Alignment with Bruen Standards","[{\"question\":\"What is SB 948 (Arreguín) intended to do?\",\"answer\":\"It would require people who bring firearms into California from outside the state to acquire a Firearm Safety Certificate within 180 days, including training that involves live-fire instruction.\"},{\"question\":\"What are the current FSC requirements under California law?\",\"answer\":\"Current law generally requires FSCs for people acquiring firearms in California, with a DOJ written test and course warnings on safe storage, proper transfer, and suicide prevention. FSCs expire after five years.\"},{\"question\":\"How does CPPC connect SB 948 to New York State Rifle \\u0026 Pistol Assn. v. Bruen?\",\"answer\":\"CPPC argues SB 948 sets narrow, objective, and definite firearm safety-course standards that aim to ensure responsible, law-abiding carriage, aligning more closely with permitted requirements than broader “shall-issue” concerns.\"}]","SB 948 (Arreguín) - COSPONSOR Letter of Support | PDF",1791008103]