[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-267150-105":59,"doc-detail-267150-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","sat-practice-essay-2-score-explanations","SAT Practice Essay 2 - Score Explanations","","SAT Practice Essay #2 score explanations analyze two student samples responding to Dana Gioia’s argument about the decline of reading. Sample 1 earns 1 in Reading, Analysis, and Writing, showing minimal comprehension, no discernible analytical reasoning, and weak cohesion with largely copied phrasing. Sample 2 earns Reading 2, Analysis 1, and Writing 2, demonstrating partial understanding and a central claim, yet limited contextual support and inadequate analysis, plus limited control of organization and language.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/sat-practice-essay-2-score-explanations/267150/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/sat-practice-essay-2-score-explanations/267150.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Asher","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-09-14",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What does a score of 1 in Reading indicate in Sample 1?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It indicates little comprehension of Gioia’s text. The response mainly uses ideas and phrases directly from the passage with minimal evidence of understanding the central argument.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Why is the Analysis score for Sample 2 inadequate?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The response identifies an element of persuasion but does not explain why it matters to Gioia’s argument. It summarizes and repeats details from the study without connecting them to analytical requirements.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What writing issues lead Sample 1 to score 1 for Writing?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The response lacks cohesion, has no clear central claim, and shows poor organization. It relies heavily on a mash-up of snippets from Gioia’s text with little original writing control.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},267150,1789415380,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":56,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":143},687197207639,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Practice Essay \\# 2  \nSCORE EXPLANATIONS  \n© 2023 College Board. College Board, SAT, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of College Board.  \nStudent Sample 1  \nDana Gioia builds an argument designed and commissioned by the National Endowment for the Arts. Americans declined for eight of the nine major forms that are measured. College attendance ballooned, and access to information increased enormously.  \nSome of the younger kids showed in the arts and espically literature actually diminished. The significane of reading has become a persistent theme in the business world. The magazine issue of Wired, for example, sketches a new set of mental skill and habits proper to the 21st century, aptitudes deadely literally in character: not “linear, logical, and analytical talents.”  \nReading is not timeless universal capability.  \nThis response scored a 1/1/1.  \nREADING—1  \nThis response demonstrates little comprehension of Gioia’s text. The response is almost entirely composed of ideas and phrases taken directly from the passage.  \nAlthough the writer does show that the writer has read the passage by referring to the Wired article (for example, the writer conveys that employers are looking for aptitudes deadely literally in character: not “linear, logical, and analytical talents”) and by including a notable point in the passage (Reading is not [a] timeless universal capability), there is very little evidence that the writer actually understands Gioia’s main argument, and the response is limited to presenting seemingly randomly chosen details from the passage without context or connection to the central idea. Overall, this response demonstrates inadequate reading comprehension.  \nANALYSIS—1  \nThe writer demonstrates no real understanding of the analytical task and offers no discernible analysis of the source text. The writer does not describe Gioia’s use of evidence, reasoning, or stylistic or persuasive elements, nor does the writer attempt to explain the importance of these elements to Gioia’s argument. The brief response largely consists of ideas and phrases taken directly from the passage. Overall, this response demonstrates inadequate analysis.  \nWRITING—1  \nThis response demonstrates little cohesion and insufficient skill in the use and control of language. The writer includes no clear central claim or controlling idea and instead jumps into repeating ideas and phrases from the passage. There is no real organization or progression of ideas, either in paragraphs or in the essay as a whole. Furthermore, there is little to no evidence of the writer’s own writing ability since most of the response is a mash-up of brief snippets of Gioia’s text. Overall, this response demonstrates inadequate control of language and writing skill.  \n2 SAT PRACTICE ESSAY \\#2 SCORE EXPLANATIONS  \nStudent Sample 2  \nDana Gioia has a very strong belief that the decline of reading in America amoung teenagers will significantly have a negative affect on society. Ever since economical issues have arose like the attendance for college, incomes and access to information, Gioia states that the interest in young Americans for art and literature has actually diminish.  \nGioia builds an arguement by including many studies and their outcomes to persuade his audience that the decline of reading has become an issue within society. For example, Gioia references the 2001 study from the National Association of Manufactures. The study states that the company tested their employees on skill deficiencies and the outcomes were very shocking. Poor reading skills ranked second and 38 percent of employees declared that schools taught reading comprehension inefficiently.  \nDana Gioia’s arguement clearly states that the decreased interest in reading will have a negative effect because if workers cannot adequately work.  \nThis response scored a 2/1/2.  \nREADING—2  \nOnly some comprehension of the source text is demonstrated in this response. The writer clearly states Gioia’","cbCailo0zhFHfMeK","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailo0zhFHfMeK","pdf",326837,"English","# Reading\n## Score 1 explanation\n## Score 2 explanation\n# Analysis\n## Score 1 explanation\n# Writing\n## Score 1 explanation\n## Score 2 explanation","[{\"question\":\"What does a score of 1 in Reading indicate in Sample 1?\",\"answer\":\"It indicates little comprehension of Gioia’s text. The response mainly uses ideas and phrases directly from the passage with minimal evidence of understanding the central argument.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is the Analysis score for Sample 2 inadequate?\",\"answer\":\"The response identifies an element of persuasion but does not explain why it matters to Gioia’s argument. It summarizes and repeats details from the study without connecting them to analytical requirements.\"},{\"question\":\"What writing issues lead Sample 1 to score 1 for Writing?\",\"answer\":\"The response lacks cohesion, has no clear central claim, and shows poor organization. It relies heavily on a mash-up of snippets from Gioia’s text with little original writing control.\"}]","SAT Practice Essay 2 - Score Explanations | PDF",48]