[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-649348-105":59,"doc-detail-649348-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","sample-bridge-general-arrangement-ga-design-general-notes","SAMPLE BRIDGE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT (G.A.) DESIGN - General Notes","","SAMPLE BRIDGE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT (G.A.) DESIGN provides general example notes and DWG layouts for a Ministry of Forests bridge concept. It includes site information for a rocky mountain district crossing (FSR and kilometer reference), design summary, drawing number schedule, and standard general notes. The document outlines design parameters and references ministry and engineering manuals, plus left/right convention, reference point and benchmark definition, site survey assumptions, hydrology and hydraulic assessment data, and key structure and road design requirements such as traffic loading and alignment tracking vehicle constraints.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/sample-bridge-general-arrangement-ga-design-general-notes/649348/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/sample-bridge-general-arrangement-ga-design-general-notes/649348.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"gewufjwa","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-25","2026-10-23",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":14},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of this document?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It provides general example notes and DWG layouts for a Ministry of Forests bridge general arrangement design, intended to be expanded with site-specific professional notes and drawings.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What are the key design parameters and performance assumptions?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The bridge is specified as a concrete/steel composite bridge with durability of at least 45 years and a stationary anticipated service period of 45 years, following ministry bridge standards and related professional service guidelines.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How is hydrology and hydraulic assessment approached?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"A peak flow for design purposes is determined using channel characteristics, prior high-flow evidence, and several empirical peak-flow models, while considering potential climate change impacts and specifying Q100 flow and hydraulic velocities.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},649348,1792919454,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":14,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747882900,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_9964176cb1d06d4a9deccf72a44ae3dc","Ministry of Forests  \nSAMPLE BRIDGE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT (G.A.) DESIGN  \nNOTE: THIS SAMPLE DWG. PROVIDES GENERAL EXAMPLE NOTES AND DWG. LAYOUTS. A PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD (POR) MUST DEVELOP SPECIFIC NOTES AND DWGS. APPROPRIATE FOR A SPECIFIC SITE AND MUST ENSURE ALL MINISTRY AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ARE MET  \nRM-1234 SAMPLE FSR 3.24km SAMPLE CREEK  \nSAMPLE BRIDGE  \nBRITISH COLUMBIA  \nPaper Size: ANSI expand B ( 17.00 x 1 1.00 Inches) , Plot Date: June 28, 2024  \n| SITE INFORMATION |  |\n| --- | --- |\n| DISTRICT | ROCKY MOUNTAIN DISTRICT |\n| SITE No. | RM-1234 |\n| STRUCTURE No. | RM-1234A |\n| FSR NAME & KM | SAMPLE FSR 3.24km |\n| LATITUDE | 49°41'17.37\"N |\n| LONGITUDE | 115°43'37.22\"W |\n| DESIGN SUMMARY | 27.832m CONCRETE/STEEL COMPOSITE BRIDGE ON STEEL PIPES AND PRECAST CONCRETE SPREAD FOOTINGS |\n\nDRAWING NUMBER  \n11250-55-RM-1234-01  \n11250-55-RM-1234-02  \n11250-55-RM-1234-03  \n11250-55-RM-1234-04  \n11250-55-RM-1234-05  \n11250-55-RM-1234-06  \n11250-55-RM-1234-07  \n11250-55-RM-1234-08  \n11250-55-RM-1234-09  \n11250-55-RM-1234-10  \n11250-55-RM-1234-11  \n11250-55-RM-1234-12  \nDRAWING SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION  \nGENERAL NOTES-SHEET 1  \nGENERAL NOTES-SHEET 2  \nEXISTING PLAN VIEW  \nEXISTING PROFILE & SECTION VIEWS PROPOSED STRUCTURE GENERAL PLAN VIEW PROPOSED STRUCTURE DETAILED PLAN VIEW PROPOSED PROFILE VIEWS & MISC DETAILS PROPOSED ABUTMENT VIEWS & DETAILS PROPOSED ROAD SECTIONS  \nPROPOSED WB-19 VEHICLE TRACKING PROPOSED SEDIMENT  \nEXISTING PHOTOS  \nREV.  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \n0  \nDATE  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nJune 27, 2024  \nPaper Size: ANSI expand B ( 17.00 x 11.00 Inches) , Plot Date: June 28, 2024, DWG Template: V .4.0  \n\n| 1. GENERAL\u003Cbr>1.1. COORDINATING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL (CRP): C. MAKAR RFT 1.2. DESIGN PARAMETERS\u003Cbr>GENERAL DESIGN PARAMETERS DURABILITY DURABLE (>/= 45 YRS) PORTABILITY STATIONARY ANTICIPATED PERIOD THE BRIDGE WILL REMAIN AT THIS SITE 45 YEARS\u003Cbr>1.3. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH:\u003Cbr>1.3.1. THE MINISTRY BRIDGE STANDARDS MANUAL (BSM)\u003Cbr>1.3.2. GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN THE FOREST SECTOR-FOREST ROADS\u003Cbr>1.3.3. GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN THE FOREST SECTOR-CROSSINGS\u003Cbr>1.3.4. CANADIAN FOUNDATION ENGINEERING MANUAL\u003Cbr>1.4. LEFT/RIGHT CONVENTION: DETERMINED WHEN FACING DOWNSTREAM\u003Cbr>1.5. ALL REFERENCE POINTS (RP) OR BENCHMARKS (BM) ARE HEAD OF THE NAIL IN A BLAZED TREE\u003Cbr>2. SITE SURVEY\u003Cbr>3. GEOTECHNICAL\u003Cbr>SURVEY TABLE DATE OF SURVEY May 14, 2017 SITE LOCATION 49°41'17 .37\"N , 115°43'37 .22\"W SURVEYOR MP & PK COMPANY FOR\u003Cbr>3.1. A FORMAL GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT WAS NOT CARRIED OUT; HOWEVER THE SITE APPEARS TO BE COMPOSED OF A BLANKET OF GRANULAR COLLUVIUM.\u003Cbr>FOUNDATION SOILS ARE ASSUMED TO HAVE A MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE OF 200KPA. SUBSURFACE INFORMATION HAS BEEN INFERRED FROM THE SITE OBSERVATIONS OF SOIL EXPOSURES IN ROAD CUTS AND ALONG STREAM BANKS\u003Cbr>4. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ASSESSMENT\u003Cbr>4.1. A PEAK FLOW FOR DESIGN PURPOSES WAS DETERMINED BASED ONA REVIEW OF CHANNEL CHARACTERISTICS, PREVIOUS HIGH FLOW EVIDENCE, AND REVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF APPLYING SEVERAL PEAK FLOW EMPIRICAL MODELS. THESE EMPIRICAL MODELS EMPLOY ESTIMATES OF TIME OF CONCENTRATION, HYDROMETRIC STATISTICS, WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS, AND OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION TO ESTIMATE PEAK FLOW.THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF FUTURE CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH CLIMATE CHANGE HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED.\u003Cbr>4.2. FREEBOARD HEIGHT REQUIREMENT SHOWN REFERS TO UPSTREAM FACE OF STRUCTURE.\u003Cbr>4.3. LANDSLIDE AND DEBRIS FLOWS HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED BASED FROM ON SITE EVIDENCE. CROSSING HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE ANTICIPATED DEBRIS FLOWS.\u003Cbr>HYDRAULIC ASSESSMENT DATA WATERSHED DRAINAGE AREA 1137 Ha. STREAM RIPARIAN CLASS S-3 STREAM BED MATERIAL BEDROCK-0%, BOULDER-20%, COBBLES-20%, GRAVEL-60%, SAND-0% BANK FULL STREAM CHANNEL WIDTH 14.2 m STREAM GRADIEN","cbCaifqMZTYts2Q8","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifqMZTYts2Q8","pdf",3758855,13,"English","# General Notes\n## Coordinating Registered Professional (CRP)\n## Design Parameters and Standards\n## Site Survey and Geotechnical Assumptions\n## Hydrology and Hydraulic Assessment\n## Structure Design\n## Road Design\n# Further Design Work and Construction Hold Points","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of this document?\",\"answer\":\"It provides general example notes and DWG layouts for a Ministry of Forests bridge general arrangement design, intended to be expanded with site-specific professional notes and drawings.\"},{\"question\":\"What are the key design parameters and performance assumptions?\",\"answer\":\"The bridge is specified as a concrete/steel composite bridge with durability of at least 45 years and a stationary anticipated service period of 45 years, following ministry bridge standards and related professional service guidelines.\"},{\"question\":\"How is hydrology and hydraulic assessment approached?\",\"answer\":\"A peak flow for design purposes is determined using channel characteristics, prior high-flow evidence, and several empirical peak-flow models, while considering potential climate change impacts and specifying Q100 flow and hydraulic velocities.\"}]","SAMPLE BRIDGE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT (G.A.) DESIGN - General Notes | PDF",1792799285,33]