[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-610766-105":59,"doc-detail-610766-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","sace-professional-development-activity-endorsement-guideline","SACE Professional Development Activity Endorsement Guideline","","Endorsement request guideline for having a SACE professional development activity evaluated by three independent education-specialist evaluators. The process emphasizes clear, concise responses and reflective discussion of the proposed professional learning, including content, methodologies, target group, resources, and communication. Submission is structured into sections covering general provider information, an abstract (≤300 words), summary of purpose and format, and detailed evaluation criteria such as relevance, teaching methods, and learning support materials, with required information for each criterion.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/sace-professional-development-activity-endorsement-guideline/610766/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/sace-professional-development-activity-endorsement-guideline/610766.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"jayni","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/octet-stream","2026-10-19",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"How is a SACE endorsement request evaluated?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"The endorsement request is evaluated independently by three evaluators who are education specialists. They may not be familiar with your programme, so the response should be clear and concise.","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"What structure and sections are required for the submission?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"The submission should follow sections such as General Information and a Summary of the Proposed Activity, then address Evaluation criteria including relevance, teaching methods, and learning and teaching support materials.",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"What should the abstract for the proposed activity include?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"The provider must write a short abstract (not exceeding 300 words) covering the activity’s purpose, target groups, NQF level, format, duration, mode, summary of content and learning activities, and the assessment methods to be used.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},610766,1792379449,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":138,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":139,"faqs":140,"seo_title":141,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":128,"read_time":142},3985747859343,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Before you start\nThis request for endorsement of your professional development activity by SACE will be evaluated independently by 3 evaluators. These evaluators are education specialists, but are most likely not familiar with your programme. Therefore, respond as clearly and concisely as possible. Don’t exceed the maximum allowed number of words where this is specified.\nThis submission process is more than an administrative procedure to get your professional activity endorsed by SACE. Rather, it aims at encouraging you to reflect upon and discuss the professional development that you’re offering. It is an opportunity to think through the professional development activity and identify areas for improvement in content, methodologies, target group, resources, communication etc.\nThe request for endorsement should be submitted in a separate document, preferably following the same structure as this guideline. This means: 1. General Information; 2. Summary of the proposed activity; 3. Criteria with 3.1 Relevance etc. For each criterion, information is provided. Reference can be made to additional documents in annex, if necessary. If your programme is not applicable for a criterion or sub-criterion, just write ‘not applicable and include optionally a short motivation.\n1. General Information\n1.1.1 General provider information\nName Provider\nContact Person\nPostal Address\nE-mail Address\nPhone number\nCompany Registration Number\nName Activity\nDate of Activity\nLocation (site) of delivery\n1.1.2. Are you a recognized provider? (Yes/ No)\n1.1.3. If yes, who is recognizing authority? Please provide proof in your submission\n1.1.4. Do you have a certificate of accreditation for providing course? (Yes/ No)\n1.1.5. If yes, who is the accrediting authority? Please provide proof in your submission.\n1.1.6. Does the programme lead to the achievement of a Registered Unit Standard or qualification? (Yes/ No)\n1.1.7. If yes, which and accredited by whom?\n1.1.8. Briefly describe your expertise and experience in offering the programme. You may refer to the curriculum vitae of the facilitators and course developers.\n2. Summary of the Proposed Activity\nThe provider is requested to write a short abstract of the proposed activity, not exceeding 300 words. The headings below give an indication of the content that needs to be covered in the abstract.\n2.1.1. What is the purpose of the activity?\n2.1.2. What is/are the target group(s) for the activity?\n2.1.3. What is the NQF level of the activity?\n2.1.4. What is the format of the activity?\nUnit standard, qualification, short course, workshop…?\nDuration of the activity\nMode (face-to-face, mixed mode, distance education)\n2.1.5. Summary of content and learning activities\n2.1.6. Summary of assessment methods that will be used.\n3. Evaluation criteria\nCriterion: Relevance\n3.1.1. What is the rationale of the programme with reference to education policies, ANA diagnostic reports, current curriculum practice or any other system assessments (e.g. National Curriculum Statement – CAPS)? How does your programme contribute to the realization of any of these?\n3.1.2. What is the target group of the programme (specify as much as possible, incl. phase, grade, subject etc. where relevant)? Is any required prior knowledge clearly specified in the admission requirements of your programme?\n3.1.3. What are the outcomes of the programme? Make sure they’re clearly defined, realistic and appropriate for target group and system needs.\n3.1.4. Does your programme contain a clear time planning relating activities to outcomes? Is the time allocated per activity reasonable and realistic? Is the number and duration of activities suitable to achieve each learning outcome?\n3.1.6. Explain how your programme strengthens competences of prospective participants (subject matter knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, knowledge of learning and curriculum, general pedagogical knowledge, knowledge of learners, management and leadership competence, class manag","cbCaiby9BI86dmbv","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiby9BI86dmbv","doc",135168,"English","# General Information\n## Provider information\n## Recognition and accreditation\n## Programme outcomes and scope\n# Summary of the Proposed Activity\n## Activity purpose and target group\n## NQF level and activity format\n## Content, learning activities, and assessment\n# Evaluation criteria\n## Criterion: Relevance\n## Criterion: Teaching Methods\n## Criterion: Learning and Teaching Support Materials","[{\"question\":\"How is a SACE endorsement request evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"The endorsement request is evaluated independently by three evaluators who are education specialists. They may not be familiar with your programme, so the response should be clear and concise.\"},{\"question\":\"What structure and sections are required for the submission?\",\"answer\":\"The submission should follow sections such as General Information and a Summary of the Proposed Activity, then address Evaluation criteria including relevance, teaching methods, and learning and teaching support materials.\"},{\"question\":\"What should the abstract for the proposed activity include?\",\"answer\":\"The provider must write a short abstract (not exceeding 300 words) covering the activity’s purpose, target groups, NQF level, format, duration, mode, summary of content and learning activities, and the assessment methods to be used.\"}]","SACE Professional Development Activity Endorsement Guideline | DOC",13]