[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33651-en":3,"doc-seo-33651-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33651,7971461740886,"Theodore","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2",8,"Research & Report","Robin Mackay Editor Collapse Philosophical Research and Development","Editorial introduction to COLLAPSE II, presenting a curated collection of philosophical texts shaped by a vision to unite perspectives and cross disciplinary boundaries. The dossier centers on Quentin Meillassoux’s work, focusing on After Finitude and the disruptive challenge to correlationist orthodoxies about consciousness and “things in themselves.” Ray Brassier’s analysis and Meillassoux’s responses deepen debates over realism, causality, contingency, and rationalism, while an interview with Roberto Trotta connects these issues to scientific research on ancestral phenomena.","","cbCaidfVfeTvHDLt","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidfVfeTvHDLt","pdf",3093219,1,303,"English","en",105,"# Editorial Introduction\n## Dossier on Quentin Meillassoux\n## “The Enigma of Realism” and Correlationism\n## Necessity of Contingency and Causality\n## Interview with Roberto Trotta","[{\"question\":\"What is the underlying purpose of the COLLAPSE II volume?\",\"answer\":\"It assembles philosophical writing from varying perspectives and connects it with work from other fields to challenge institutional and disciplinary orthodoxies and enable new syntheses.\"},{\"question\":\"How does Ray Brassier relate to Meillassoux’s project?\",\"answer\":\"Brassier explains the stakes of the contestation but argues the deeper problem of correlationism may require a more thorough “decontamination” of the tools used in critiques. He also discusses issues linked to Meillassoux’s attempt to reinstate intuition.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is the interview with Roberto Trotta important to the volume’s discussion?\",\"answer\":\"It illustrates how philosophical problems transform when moved into scientific research contexts, offering insight into determining ancestral phenomena from an empirical and interpretive insider perspective.\"}]",1782213922,764,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":27},"robin-mackay-editor-collapse-philosophical-research-and-development",{"@graph":34,"@context":84},[35,52,67],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/robin-mackay-editor-collapse-philosophical-research-and-development/33651/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-01","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"What is the underlying purpose of the COLLAPSE II volume?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"It assembles philosophical writing from varying perspectives and connects it with work from other fields to challenge institutional and disciplinary orthodoxies and enable new syntheses.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"How does Ray Brassier relate to Meillassoux’s project?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"Brassier explains the stakes of the contestation but argues the deeper problem of correlationism may require a more thorough “decontamination” of the tools used in critiques. He also discusses issues linked to Meillassoux’s attempt to reinstate intuition.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"Why is the interview with Roberto Trotta important to the volume’s discussion?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"It illustrates how philosophical problems transform when moved into scientific research contexts, offering insight into determining ancestral phenomena from an empirical and interpretive insider perspective.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":86,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]