[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-534597-105":59,"doc-detail-534597-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","rfp-12-review-rubric-prevention-initiative-program","RFP 12 Review Rubric - Prevention Initiative Program","","Evaluation rubric comparing proposal responses against standard and exemplary expectations for a Prevention Initiative program. It covers how proposals document need using poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, limited-English proficiency, and related indicators; how they describe services that avoid duplication and meet currently unmet needs; and how they establish clear eligibility criteria and indicators. It also assesses recruitment strategies and the enrollment plan for eligible children and families, supported by population and statewide statistics.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/rfp-12-review-rubric-prevention-initiative-program/534597/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/rfp-12-review-rubric-prevention-initiative-program/534597.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"River Wang","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-10","2026-10-10",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What evidence of need does the rubric require in the proposal narrative?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The proposal should clearly indicate significant at-risk characteristics and provide analysis supported by indicators such as poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, limited-English proficiency, and other need-related measures.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the rubric evaluate whether proposed services duplicate existing programs?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Proposals are expected to describe how services will not duplicate services already being provided and how the plan will meet needs not currently met by other programs.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What recruitment and enrollment planning elements are assessed?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The rubric checks whether proposals propose effective recruitment strategies and a plan likely to enroll the maximum eligible children and families, including outreach and identification procedures for families most at-risk.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},534597,1791753527,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":145,"read_time":146,"preview_page_count":4},1099514067438,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539ee87300030?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1780474512215547542","| Criteria | Does Not Meet Standard | Meets Standard | Exemplary |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Clearly indicates that the area to be | Statement of need | Statement of need | Statement of need |\n| served has a high number of | Proposal provides little, if any, data | Proposal describes adequate evidence of need | Proposal provides strong evidence of need for |\n| children and families determined to | analysis to show need for prevention | for the prevention initiative program with | the Prevention Initiative program with |\n| be the most in need of the services | initiative in the area. | some data analysis of: | detailed analysis of: |\n| as indicated by high levels of poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, limited-English proficiency, or other need-related indicators, such as the school district’s rate of dropouts, retention, truancy, teenage pregnancies and homeless students, high rates of infant mortality, birth trauma, low birth weight or prematurity, and high rates of child abuse and neglect.\u003Cbr>Statement of need | a. Children and families do not appear at-risk or there are low numbers of previously unserved at-risk children and families ; | a. Characteristics of families and children related to educational level of parents; employment conditions; rates of infant mortality, birth trauma, low birth weight or prematurity; district rates of dropouts, retention, truancy, teenage pregnancies, and homeless students; numbers of non-English speaking families; rates of poverty, child abuse and neglect; | a. Characteristics of families and children related to levels of poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, limited English proficiency (e.g., high % of parent victims of domestic abuse, TANF eligibility; rates of infant mortality, birth trauma, low birth weight or prematurity, high % special needs eligible siblings/primary caregivers, foster families, homelessness,); |\n| Proposal Narrative pages 12 & 13 | b. Community demographics do | b. Previously unserved highly at-risk | b. Large numbers of previously unserved |\n| Attachment 3a | not indicate significant at-risk characteristics. | children and families in need of services, as documented by community demographics (e.g., district low income %, rates of teen | at-risk children and families in need of services, as documented by community demographics (e.g., district low income %, rates of teen |\n| (See next page for statewide statistics) |  | births, high % truancy, mobility, child abuse, substance abuse) . | births, high % truancy, mobility, child abuse, substance abuse) . |\n|  | Proposal does not describe how these | Proposal adequately describes how these | Proposal provides a detailed description of |\n|  | services will not duplicate services | services will meet needs not currently | other programs in the community and how |\n|  | being provided by other programs. | being met by other programs. | these services will meet needs not currently |\n|  |  |  | met by those programs. |\n| Criteria and indicators for | Proposal does not describe criteria and | Proposal adequately describes criteria and | Proposal describes criteria and indicators that |\n| identifying children and families | indicators or the description does not | indicators that will: | have a strong likelihood of ensuring the |\n| who are eligible for the program | seem likely to ensure that it will: | a. Identify children and families who | program will: |\n| are clearly established and likely to | a. Identify children and families | are eligible for the program, and | a. Identify children and families who |\n| target those children and families most in need of services. | who are eligible for the program, and\u003Cbr>b. Target those children and families most in need of services. | b. Target those children and families most in need of services. | are eligible for the program, and\u003Cbr>b. Target those children and families most in need of services. |\n\n\n| Criteria | Does Not Meet Standard | Meets Standard | Exemplary |\n| --- | --- | --- | -","cbCaidgYzhfP7Bif","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidgYzhfP7Bif","pdf",204765,18,"English","# Proposal Need and Evidence\n## Statement of need indicators\n## Community demographics and at-risk characteristics\n# Service Fit and Non-Duplication\n## How services meet unmet needs\n# Eligibility Criteria and Targeting\n## Identifying eligible children and families\n## Targeting children most in need\n# Recruitment and Enrollment Plan\n## Effective recruitment strategies\n## Population to be served and outreach procedures","[{\"question\":\"What evidence of need does the rubric require in the proposal narrative?\",\"answer\":\"The proposal should clearly indicate significant at-risk characteristics and provide analysis supported by indicators such as poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, limited-English proficiency, and other need-related measures.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the rubric evaluate whether proposed services duplicate existing programs?\",\"answer\":\"Proposals are expected to describe how services will not duplicate services already being provided and how the plan will meet needs not currently met by other programs.\"},{\"question\":\"What recruitment and enrollment planning elements are assessed?\",\"answer\":\"The rubric checks whether proposals propose effective recruitment strategies and a plan likely to enroll the maximum eligible children and families, including outreach and identification procedures for families most at-risk.\"}]","RFP 12 Review Rubric - Prevention Initiative Program | PDF",1791598671,45]