[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31646":3,"doc-seo-31646":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31646,1374391974468,"Eden","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0",9,"Religion & Spirituality","Review of Qur’anic Research: Quranic Arabic From its Hijazi Origins to its Classical Reading Traditions","Review assessing Marijn van Putten’s Quranic Arabic: From its Hijazi Origins to its Classical Reading Traditions (Brill, 2022), focusing on scholarly debates over Qur’anic composition, codification, and—most centrally—the language of the Qur’an. It traces earlier claims that Qur’anic Arabic aligns with Classical Arabic and pre-Islamic qaṣīdah language, contrasts Karl Vollers’ Meccan-dialect thesis with Theodor Nöldeke’s objections, and argues that new evidence from pre- and early Islamic epigraphy and philology calls for re-examining Qur’an language and orthography.","cbCaivJtCyz1zIIt","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivJtCyz1zIIt","pdf",211557,1,13,"English","en","# Debates on Qur’anic composition and language\n## From Classical Arabic alignment to alternative hypotheses\n## Vollers vs. Nöldeke: case and recitation traditions\n## New epigraphic and philological evidence for re-examination","[{\"question\":\"What central issue does the review highlight about Qur’anic studies?\",\"answer\":\"It highlights the relative lack of discussion about the Qur’an’s language compared with extensive debates on composition date and codification, and it evaluates competing views on how the Qur’an’s language relates to Classical Arabic and pre-Islamic poetry.\"},{\"question\":\"How did Karl Vollers explain the language of the Qur’an?\",\"answer\":\"Vollers argued that the Qur’an originally reflected the dialect of Mecca, later classicized by imposing features that distinguish Classical Arabic, including nominal case and verbal mood endings.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the review call for re-examining Qur’anic language and orthography?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that major developments in pre- and early Islamic epigraphy and philology—such as newly available examples from the Hijaz and other regions—provide evidence that undermines older assumptions based mainly on later manuscript attestations of pre-Islamic material.\"}]",1779829327,33,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"review-of-quranic-research-quranic-arabic-from-its-hijazi-origins-to-its-classical-reading-traditions","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/religion-spirituality/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/review-of-quranic-research-quranic-arabic-from-its-hijazi-origins-to-its-classical-reading-traditions/31646/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-26",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What central issue does the review highlight about Qur’anic studies?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"It highlights the relative lack of discussion about the Qur’an’s language compared with extensive debates on composition date and codification, and it evaluates competing views on how the Qur’an’s language relates to Classical Arabic and pre-Islamic poetry.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How did Karl Vollers explain the language of the Qur’an?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Vollers argued that the Qur’an originally reflected the dialect of Mecca, later classicized by imposing features that distinguish Classical Arabic, including nominal case and verbal mood endings.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"Why does the review call for re-examining Qur’anic language and orthography?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"It argues that major developments in pre- and early Islamic epigraphy and philology—such as newly available examples from the Hijaz and other regions—provide evidence that undermines older assumptions based mainly on later manuscript attestations of pre-Islamic material.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]