[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-83083-en":3,"doc-seo-83083-105":29,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":91},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},83083,1374391975076,"Riley","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/14000253ca4ec9f6853?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1783305029341752051",8,"Research & Report","Responsible Personalisation: The Double-Edged Sword of Personalisation in Human-Robot Interaction","Responsible personalisation is increasingly central to human–robot interaction (HRI), yet research on it remains fragmented, describing ethical risks without a cohesive model of how those risks arise across different interaction contexts. This work proposes a lifecycle-based, context-sensitive framework for personalised HRI using an embodiment-aware perspective. It links personalisation stages with interaction characteristics to analyze risk emergence and evolution. An integrative review addresses autonomy erosion, biased user modelling, manipulation, dehumanisation, and privacy violations, concluding with actionable design recommendations and future research challenges.","RESPONSIBLE PERSONALISATION: THE DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD OF PERSONALISATION IN HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION  \narXiv :2607 .06344v 1 [ cs .RO] 7 Jul 2026  \nAntonio Andriella∗  \nInstitut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial (CSIC-UPC) Llorens i Artigas 4-6, 08028, Barcelona, Spain [aandriella@iri.upc.edu](aandriella@iri.upc.edu)  \nAndrea Rezzani  \nFree University of Bozen-Bolzano  \nBozen, Italy  \n[anrezzani@unibz.it](anrezzani@unibz.it)  \nJauwairia Nasir∗  \nUniversität Augsburg Augsburg, Germany [jauwairia.nasir@uni-a.de](jauwairia.nasir@uni-a.de)  \nAlyssa Kubota  \nSan Francisco State University San Francisco, CA, USA [akubota@sfsu.edu](akubota@sfsu.edu)  \nDimitri Lacroix  \nNantes Université, Univ Angers, Laboratoire de psychologie des Pays de la Loire, LPPL  \nUR 4638, F-44000, Nantes, France  \nBielefeld University,  \nCenter for Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) Germany  \n[Dimitri.lacroix@univ-nantes.fr](Dimitri.lacroix@univ-nantes.fr)  \nTamlin Love  \nInstitut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial (CSIC-UPC) Llorens i Artigas 4-6, 08028, Barcelona, Spain  \n[tlove@iri.upc.edu](tlove@iri.upc.edu)  \nAniol Civit  \nInstitut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial (CSIC-UPC) Llorens i Artigas 4-6, 08028, Barcelona, Spain  \n[acivit@iri.upc.edu](acivit@iri.upc.edu)  \nVicky Charisi  \nSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Singapore Centre for Collective Intelligence, MIT Cambridge, MA, USA [vasiliki.charisi@smart.mit.edu](vasiliki.charisi@smart.mit.edu)  \nElisabeth Andre  \nUniversität Augsburg Augsburg, Germany [elisabeth.andre@uni-a.de](elisabeth.andre@uni-a.de)  \nWing–Yue Geoffrey Louie  \nOakland University Rochester, MI, USA [louie@oakland.edu](louie@oakland.edu)  \n∗These authors contributed equally to this work, where the names are written in alphabetical order of the last name  \nANDRIELLA , AND NASIR  \nABSTRACT  \nWhile personalisation is becoming a defining capability in human–robot interaction (HRI), the existing literature on responsible personalisation remains fragmented, offering isolated accounts of ethical risks without a structured understanding of how they emerge across interaction contexts. This gap is particularly critical in HRI, where robots’ embodiment and social presence can amplify andreshape such risks or generate new types of risks. We present a lifecycle-based and context-sensitive framework for personalised HRI, grounded in an embodiment-aware perspective. The framework combines stages of the personalisation process with interaction characteristics (short-vs. long-term, open-vs. closed-domain), enabling systematic analysis of how risks arise and evolve. Building on this, we conduct an integrative analysis of key ethical risks, including autonomy erosion, biased user modelling, manipulation, dehumanisation, and privacy violations, and examine how they manifest across contexts. We translate these insights into actionable design recommendations and outline open research challenges. By structuring both the design space and risk landscape of personalised HRI, this work provides a foundation for more systematic, transparent, and ethically grounded approaches to personalised robot behaviour.  \nKeywords Responsible Robotics · Robot Personalisation · Robot Adaptation · Robot Customisation · Risks of Personalisation  \n1 Introduction  \nPersonalisation has become a cornerstone in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), enabling robots to adapt their behaviour to individual users in ways that foster engagement, task effectiveness, as well as trust and collaboration among the parties [2, 152, 208] . Across domains such as healthcare, education, and hospitality, personalised interactions have shown clear benefits, both in short-term encounters, where quick adaptation is key [8], and in long-term relationships, where the responsiveness to users’ evolving needs is crucial [73] .  \nThat said, there are reasons to believe that personalisation in HRI is a double-edged sword. While it promises to enhance user experiences [208, 88], it als","cbCaijpd98pLQGjs","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijpd98pLQGjs","pdf",1482355,1,36,"English","en",105,"# Introduction\n## Background and motivation\n## Responsible personalisation as a double-edged sword\n## Research gap and workshop outcomes","[{\"question\":\"为什么人机会交互中的个性化被称为“双刃剑”？\",\"answer\":\"文中指出，个性化能够提升用户体验与协作，但也可能削弱用户自主性并放大社会偏见，从而带来伦理张力。\"},{\"question\":\"作者提出了怎样的框架来分析负责任个性化的风险？\",\"answer\":\"提出基于生命周期、且对具体情境敏感的个性化HRI框架，并采用“以具身为感知”的视角。该框架把个性化过程的阶段与交互特征相结合，用于系统分析风险如何产生与演化。\"},{\"question\":\"文中重点讨论了哪些伦理风险？\",\"answer\":\"包括自主性侵蚀、偏置的用户建模、操纵（manipulation）、非人化（dehumanisation）以及隐私侵犯，并进一步考察其在不同情境中的呈现方式。\"}]",1784185087,91,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":33,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":27},"responsible-personalisation-the-double-edged-sword-of-personalisation-in-human-robot-interaction","",{"@graph":35,"@context":85},[36,53,68],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,47,50],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":48,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":49},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":51,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":52},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/responsible-personalisation-the-double-edged-sword-of-personalisation-in-human-robot-interaction/83083/",4,{"url":51,"name":13,"@type":54,"author":55,"headline":13,"publisher":57,"fileFormat":60,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":61,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":60,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":56},"Person",{"url":40,"name":58,"@type":59},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-17","2026-07-16",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"为什么人机会交互中的个性化被称为“双刃剑”？","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"文中指出，个性化能够提升用户体验与协作，但也可能削弱用户自主性并放大社会偏见，从而带来伦理张力。","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"作者提出了怎样的框架来分析负责任个性化的风险？",{"text":80,"@type":76},"提出基于生命周期、且对具体情境敏感的个性化HRI框架，并采用“以具身为感知”的视角。该框架把个性化过程的阶段与交互特征相结合，用于系统分析风险如何产生与演化。",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"文中重点讨论了哪些伦理风险？",{"text":84,"@type":76},"包括自主性侵蚀、偏置的用户建模、操纵（manipulation）、非人化（dehumanisation）以及隐私侵犯，并进一步考察其在不同情境中的呈现方式。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":51,"og:type":87,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":58,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":51},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":92},[93,97,101,105,110,115,120,123,128,131,135],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},30,"research-report",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":127},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":126,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":130},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":132,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":132,"slug":134},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":136,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":45,"category_name":137,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":138},19,"General","general"]